Global (latitudinal) variation in submarine channel sinuosity: REPLY

Current classifications of submarine channels and fans link channel sinuosity to gradient, and in turn to sediment caliber, with end members being high-sinuosity, low-gradient, fine-grained systems and low-sinuosity, high-gradient, coarse-grained systems. However, the most sinuous modern submarine channels, such as the Amazon, Bengal, Indus, and Zaire, along with ancient sinuous submarine channels, are located in equatorial regions. Here we quantitatively compare slope versus latitude controls on submarine channel sinuosity and show that the latitudinal control is strong, while that of slope is weak. Variation in sinuosity with latitude is shown to occur uniquely in submarine channels; no comparable relationship is observed for terrestrial river channels. Possible causal mechanisms for this latitudinal variation are explored, focusing on the influence of the Coriolis force, flow type, and sediment type. Although climate does not vary straightforwardly with latitude, climatic controls on flow and sediment type may explain some of the latitudinal variation; Coriolis force, however, varies with latitude alone and produces an excellent fit to the observed sinuosity-latitude distribution. Regardless of which control predominates, latitudinal global variation in channel sinuosity should have changed over geologic time. Since deposit architecture and facies are linked directly with sinuosity, submarine channel deposits should also systematically vary in space and time.

[1]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[2]  J. Clark,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the geometry of submarine channels: Implications for the classification of submarine fans , 1992 .

[3]  M. Richards,et al.  Turbidite Systems in Deep-Water Basin Margins Classified by Grain Size and Feeder System , 1994 .

[4]  T. Oki,et al.  Design of Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP)—A Global River Channel Network , 1998 .

[5]  J. Shaw,et al.  Stratigraphic and sedimentological evidence for late Wisconsinan sub-glacial outburst floods to Laurentian Fan , 2007 .

[6]  S. J. Friedmann,et al.  Seismic Geomorphology and Evolution of Submarine Channels from the Angolan Continental Margin , 2007 .

[7]  J. Mienert,et al.  On the architecture of high-latitude continental margins: the influence of ice-sheet and sea-ice processes in the Polar North Atlantic , 2002, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[8]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Geology, Geography, and Humans Battle for Dominance over the Delivery of Fluvial Sediment to the Coastal Ocean , 2007, The Journal of Geology.

[9]  A. Aksu,et al.  Gravity-driven flow in a submarine channel bend: Direct field evidence of helical flow reversal , 2010 .

[10]  R. Cossu,et al.  The evolution of submarine channels under the influence of Coriolis forces: experimental observations of flow structures , 2013 .

[11]  C. Sonett,et al.  Late Proterozoic and Paleozoic Tides, Retreat of the Moon, and Rotation of the Earth , 1996, Science.

[12]  D. Piper,et al.  Initiation Processes and Flow Evolution of Turbidity Currents: Implications for the Depositional Record , 1991, From Shoreline to Abyss: Contributions in Marine Geology in Honor of Francis Parker Shepard.

[13]  D. Piper,et al.  Processes That Initiate Turbidity Currents and Their Influence on Turbidites: A Marine Geology Perspective , 2009 .

[14]  Y. Hayakawa,et al.  The Climatic Signature of Incised River Meanders , 2010, Science.

[15]  D. Piper,et al.  Sandy fans--from Amazon to Hueneme and beyond , 2001 .

[16]  Jasim Imran,et al.  Reconstruction of turbidity currents in Amazon Channel , 2003 .

[17]  R. Cossu,et al.  Coriolis forces influence the secondary circulation of gravity currents flowing in large‐scale sinuous submarine channel systems , 2010 .

[18]  R. Wynn,et al.  Continental margin sedimentation, with special reference to the north‐east Atlantic margin , 2000 .

[19]  Alessandro Cantelli,et al.  Global (latitudinal) variation in submarine channel sinuosity: COMMENT , 2013 .

[20]  C. Nelson,et al.  Morphology and Acoustic Character of the Antarctic Wilkes Land Turbidite Systems: Ice-Sheet-Sourced Versus River-Sourced Fans , 2000 .

[21]  E. Sumner,et al.  Deposits of flows transitional between turbidity current and debris flow , 2009 .

[22]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Turbidity Currents Generated at River Mouths during Exceptional Discharges to the World Oceans , 1995, The Journal of Geology.

[23]  P. Komar The channelized flow of turbidity currents with application to Monterey Deep‐Sea Fan Channel , 1969 .

[24]  George E. Williams,et al.  Precambrian length of day and the validity of tidal rhythmite paleotidal values , 1997 .

[25]  S. Schumm,et al.  Experimental Study of Channel Patterns , 1972 .

[26]  R. Wynn,et al.  Sinuous deep-water channels: Genesis, geometry and architecture , 2007 .

[27]  Y. Kristoffersen,et al.  A submarine fan in the Amundsen Basin, Arctic Ocean , 2004 .

[28]  Gary Parker,et al.  Secondary Flow in Mildly Sinuous Channel , 1989 .

[29]  W. Ryan,et al.  Flow parameters of turbidity currents in a low‐sinuosity giant deep‐sea channel , 1997 .

[30]  A. Wåhlin,et al.  Influence of the Coriolis force on the velocity structure of gravity currents in straight submarine channel systems , 2010 .

[31]  J. Peakall,et al.  The influence of bend amplitude and planform morphology on flow and sedimentation in submarine channels , 2010 .