Keystone species in seed dispersal networks are mainly determined by dietary specialization

A central issue in ecology is the definition and identification of keystone species, i.e. species that are relatively more important than others for maintaining community structure and ecosystem functioning. Network theory has been pointed out as a robust theoretical framework to enhance the operationality of the keystone species concept. We used the concept of centrality as a proxy for a species’ relative importance for the structure of seed dispersal networks composed of either frugivorous bats or birds and their food-plants. Centrality was expected to be determined mainly by dietary specialization, but also by body mass and geographic range size. Across 15 Neotropical datasets, only specialized frugivore species reached the highest values of centrality. Furthermore, the centrality of specialized frugivores varied widely within and among networks, whereas that of secondary and opportunistic frugivores was consistently low. A mixed-effects model showed that centrality was best explained by dietary specialization, but not by body mass or range size. Furthermore, the relationship between centrality and those three ecological correlates differed between bat- and bird-fruit networks. Our findings suggest that dietary specialization is key to understand what makes a frugivore species a keystone in seed dispersal networks, and that taxonomic identity also plays a significant role. Specialized frugivores may play a central role in network structuring and ecosystem functioning, which has important implications for conservation and restoration.

[1]  M. Mello,et al.  Partitioning of seed dispersal services between birds and bats in a fragment of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest , 2014 .

[2]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[3]  T. Kunz,et al.  Fruit bats and bat fruits: the evolution of fruit scent in relation to the foraging behaviour of bats in the New and Old World tropics , 2013 .

[4]  I. C. Machado,et al.  Functional Roles of Centridini Oil Bees and Malpighiaceae Oil Flowers in Biome‐wide Pollination Networks , 2013 .

[5]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Extending the concept of keystone species to communities and ecosystems. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[6]  L. Navarro,et al.  The role of frugivory in the diversification of bats in the Neotropics , 2012 .

[7]  Marco A. R. Mello,et al.  Invasive Africanized honeybees change the structure of native pollination networks in Brazil , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[8]  L. D. Costa,et al.  How Many Nodes are Effectively Accessed in Complex Networks? , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Ç. Şekercioğlu,et al.  Bird dietary guild richness across latitudes, environments and biogeographic regions , 2012 .

[10]  L. Cagnolo,et al.  Keystones in a Tangled Bank , 2012, Science.

[11]  Sharlene E. Santana,et al.  Morphological innovation, diversification and invasion of a new adaptive zone , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  E. K. Pikitch,et al.  Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth , 2011, Science.

[13]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  The modularity of seed dispersal: differences in structure and robustness between bat– and bird–fruit networks , 2011, Oecologia.

[14]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  The Missing Part of Seed Dispersal Networks: Structure and Robustness of Bat-Fruit Interactions , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Ç. Şekercioğlu Functional Extinctions of Bird Pollinators Cause Plant Declines , 2011, Science.

[16]  Marco A. R. Mello,et al.  Flower-visiting guild associated with the Caatinga flora: trophic interaction networks formed by social bees and social wasps with plants , 2010, Apidologie.

[17]  P. Jordano,et al.  Seed dispersal effectiveness revisited: a conceptual review. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[18]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Ecological Networks , 2010, Science.

[19]  O. von Helversen,et al.  Evolution of nectarivory in phyllostomid bats (Phyllostomidae Gray, 1825, Chiroptera: Mammalia) , 2010, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[20]  Nico Blüthgen,et al.  Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: A critique and an ecologist's guide , 2010 .

[21]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks , 2010 .

[22]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Defining and measuring ecological specialization , 2010 .

[23]  Marco A. R. Mello,et al.  Pollination networks of oil-flowers: a tiny world within the smallest of all worlds. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2009, Ecology.

[25]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Disentangling the Web of Life , 2009, Science.

[26]  S. Mori,et al.  Seed Dispersal by Bats in the Neotropics , 2009 .

[27]  J. Olesen,et al.  Ecological modules and roles of species in heathland plant-insect flower visitor networks. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[28]  W. Jetz,et al.  The global distribution of frugivory in birds , 2009 .

[29]  K. Gaston,et al.  The sizes of species’ geographic ranges , 2009 .

[30]  L. D. Costa,et al.  Accessibility in complex networks , 2008 .

[31]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? , 2008, Ecology.

[32]  Wesley Rodrigues Silva,et al.  Movements of the bat Sturnira lilium and its role as a seed disperser of Solanaceae in the Brazilian Atlantic forest , 2008, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[33]  A. L. Gardner Mammals of South America, Volume 1: Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews, and Bats , 2008 .

[34]  M. Galetti,et al.  Why are fruits colorful? The relative importance of achromatic and chromatic contrasts for detection by birds , 2009, Evolutionary Ecology.

[35]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Robert Muscarella,et al.  The Role of Frugivorous Bats in Tropical Forest Succession , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks , 2007 .

[38]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Measuring specialization in species interaction networks , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[39]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[40]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software , 2018 .

[41]  Lucas J Stal,et al.  Analysis of a marine phototrophic biofilm by confocal laser scanning microscopy using the new image quantification software PHLIP , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[42]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Scaling up keystone effects from simple to complex ecological networks , 2005 .

[43]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Body size in ecological networks. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  J. Thompson The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution , 2005 .

[45]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Ecosystem consequences of bird declines , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  E. Kalko,et al.  Phenology of neotropical pepper plants (Piperaceae) and their association with their main dispersers, two short‐tailed fruit bats, Carollia perspicillata and C. castanea (Phyllostomidae) , 2004 .

[48]  A. Peracchi,et al.  FIG-SEED PREDATION BY 2 SPECIES OF CHIRODERMA: DISCOVERY OF A NEW FEEDING STRATEGY IN BATS , 2003 .

[49]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Latitudinal trends in plant‐pollinator interactions: are tropical plants more specialised? , 2002 .

[50]  Wesley Rodrigues Silva,et al.  Seed dispersal and frugivory : ecology, evolution, and conservation , 2002 .

[51]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 1997 .

[52]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  THE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Size, Shape, Boundaries, and Internal Structure , 1996 .

[53]  J. Castilla,et al.  Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .

[54]  J. Bernardo,et al.  Simplifying the Jargon of Community Ecology: A Conceptual Approach , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[55]  R. Paine A Conversation on Refining the Concept of Keystone Species , 1995 .

[56]  P. Jordano Angiosperm Fleshy Fruits and Seed Dispersers: A Comparative Analysis of Adaptation and Constraints in Plant-Animal Interactions , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[57]  R. Nowak Walker's bats of the world , 1994 .

[58]  Theodore H. Fleming,et al.  Effects of Nectarivorous and Frugivorous Mammals on Reproductive Success of Plants , 1994 .

[59]  D. Doak,et al.  The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .

[60]  T. Fleming The Relationship between Body Size, Diet, and Habitat Use in Frugivorous Bats, Genus Carollia (Phyllostomidae) , 1991 .

[61]  G. Pyke Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review , 1984 .

[62]  E. Heithaus Coevolution between Bats and Plants , 1982 .

[63]  R. Paine A Note on Trophic Complexity and Community Stability , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[64]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.