Resolving public goods dilemma by giving the poor more support

Abstract The question of resource allocation has been the focus issue in social and natural science. Should we narrow the gap between the rich and poor? Or should we increase the income inequality? Inspired by this matter, we propose a payoff redistribution model and explore which case can evaluate the cooperative level in public goods game. Specifically, we use a single parameter α to control the above two scenarios. Positive α increases the income inequality between rich and poor, while negative α ensures this equality and the case of α = 0 turns our model to the symmetric case, where there is no payoff redistribution effect. Extensive simulation shows that when we narrow the gap between the rich and poor, cooperation can be maintained, conversely, if this income inequality is increased, the cooperative groups are destroyed. Our work thus provides a novel clue to explore this problem especially from the viewpoint of evolutionary game theory.

[1]  H. Daly Toward A Steady-State Economy , 1973 .

[2]  Robert J. Smith Resolving the Tragedy of the Commons by Creating Private Property Rights in Wildlife , 1981 .

[3]  Haipeng Peng,et al.  Principle for performing attractor transits with single control in Boolean networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Zhen Wang,et al.  If players are sparse social dilemmas are too: Importance of percolation for evolution of cooperation , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Yanfeng Shi,et al.  STP-LWE: A Variant of Learning with Error for a Flexible Encryption , 2014 .

[6]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[7]  M. Milinski,et al.  Volunteering leads to rock–paper–scissors dynamics in a public goods game , 2003, Nature.

[8]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Onymity promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments , 2017, Science Advances.

[9]  Long Wang,et al.  Effects of heterogeneous wealth distribution on public cooperation with collective risk. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Aspiring to the Fittest and Promotion of Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  R. J. Requejo,et al.  Evolution of cooperation mediated by limiting resources: connecting resource based models and evolutionary game theory. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  P. Kollock SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[13]  Baokui Wang,et al.  Effects of income redistribution on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games , 2016 .

[14]  Gary Bornstein,et al.  Cooperation in Intergroup and Single-Group Social Dilemmas , 1994 .

[15]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[16]  Johannes Keller,et al.  Sadism, the Intuitive System, and Antisocial Punishment in the Public Goods Game , 2017, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  S. Boccaletti,et al.  Popularity enhances the interdependent network reciprocity , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[18]  Juan Wang,et al.  Evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game with adaptive reputation assortment , 2016 .

[19]  Haipeng Peng,et al.  Attractor Transformation by Impulsive Control in Boolean Control Network , 2013 .

[20]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Social norms and human cooperation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  M. Perc,et al.  Doubly effects of information sharing on interdependent network reciprocity , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[22]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.

[23]  Danyang Jia,et al.  The impact of neutral reward on cooperation in public good game , 2018, European Physical Journal B : Condensed Matter Physics.

[24]  M. Perc,et al.  Coevolutionary resolution of the public goods dilemma in interdependent structured populations , 2018, EPL (Europhysics Letters).

[25]  C. Hauert,et al.  Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods Games , 2002, Science.

[26]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on a square lattice , 1997, cond-mat/9710096.

[27]  E. Ostrom Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[28]  Bo Gao,et al.  State analysis of Boolean control networks with impulsive and uncertain disturbances , 2017, Appl. Math. Comput..

[29]  W. Lam Governing the Commons , 2010 .

[30]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[31]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction - Second Edition , 2009 .

[32]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010, ArXiv.

[33]  C. Hauert,et al.  Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  S. Boccaletti,et al.  Winner-weaken-loser-strengthen rule leads to optimally cooperative interdependent networks , 2019 .

[36]  Jochem Marotzke,et al.  Stabilizing the earth's climate is not a losing game: supporting evidence from public goods experiments. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Perc,et al.  Aspiration-based coevolution of link weight promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[38]  Huijia Li,et al.  Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[40]  Rongrong Fu,et al.  A novel method for reconstructing period with single input in NFSR , 2018 .

[41]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Exploiting a cognitive bias promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments , 2018, Nature Communications.