Types of Embodiment in Design: The Embodied Foundations of Meaning and Affect in Product Design

Since the introduction of the embodied cognition framework in cognitive and social psychology, numerous studies have demonstrated links between everyday bodily experiences and product evaluations involving meaning portrayal and affect. To date, however, no comprehensive framework for understanding embodiment in relation to design experience has been developed. Hence, one goal of this article is to set out a typology for understanding embodiment in relation to multi-sensory product appearance and action. A second goal is showing why insights from embodiment may be inspiring and useful to designers and why understanding of the embodied dynamics underlying product experience may guide designers in creating meaningful objects. To substantiate these assumptions, we present the different types of embodiment most relevant in relation to design research accompanied by examples. We expand on the design goals that might underlie these different types, suggesting new avenues for design and design research based on our research propositions and findings.

[1]  Julia Fink,et al.  Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction , 2012, ICSR.

[2]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  Mark Rowlands,et al.  The body in mind , 1999 .

[4]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Tracy Brown,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2002, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[6]  M. Sawada,et al.  Expression of Emotions in Dance: Relation between Arm Movement Characteristics and Emotion , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[8]  C. Spence,et al.  Auditory contributions to multisensory product perception , 2006 .

[9]  Wim Muller,et al.  The bodily basis of product experience , 2005 .

[10]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .

[11]  T. V. Rompay,et al.  Product expression : Bridging the gap between the symbolic and the concrete , 2008 .

[12]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[13]  S. Gosling,et al.  A room with a cue: personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  E. Ozcan Vieira,et al.  Basic Semantics of Product Sounds , 2012 .

[15]  Idit Shalev,et al.  The substitutability of physical and social warmth in daily life. , 2012, Emotion.

[16]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  Appearences can be deceiving. The portal of weight and embodied meaning portrayal in product design , 2014 .

[17]  Caroline Hummels,et al.  Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Umberto Eco,et al.  A theory of semiotics , 1976, Advances in semiotics.

[19]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  Physical gestures for abstract concepts: Inclusive design with primary metaphors , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[20]  Louisa Penfold Art as experience , 2017 .

[21]  F. Saussure,et al.  Course in General Linguistics , 1960 .

[22]  Daniel Saakes,et al.  Grounding abstract object characteristics in embodied interactions. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Jörn Hurtienne,et al.  Image Schemas and Design for Intuitive Use , 2011 .

[24]  Philip Ross,et al.  Designing behavior in interaction : using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design , 2010 .

[25]  Thomas W. Schubert Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Mechanistic versus phenomenal embodiment: Can robot embodiment lead to strong AI? , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[27]  Meng Zhang,et al.  From Physical Weight to Psychological Significance: The Contribution of Semantic Activations , 2012 .

[28]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  G. Lakoff Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[31]  Geke D.S. Ludden,et al.  Effects of visual-auditory incongruity on product expression and surprise , 2007 .

[32]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Power Posing , 2010, Psychological science.

[33]  S. Guthrie,et al.  Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion , 1994 .

[34]  Sandor Czellar,et al.  Engineering Hedonic Attributes to Generate Perceptions of Luxury: Consumer Perception of an Everyday Sound , 2003 .

[35]  Carl F. DiSalvo,et al.  From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design , 2003, DPPI '03.

[36]  R. Belk Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[37]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design , 2006, DIS '06.

[38]  P. Silvia What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. , 2005, Emotion.

[39]  R. Laban,et al.  The mastery of movement , 1950 .

[40]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Dancing with a machine: a case of experience-driven design , 2003, DPPI '03.

[41]  Chen-Bo Zhong,et al.  Cold and Lonely , 2008, Psychological science.

[42]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  Embodied Product Perception: Effects of Verticality Cues in Advertising and Packaging Design on Consumer Impressions and Price Expectations , 2012 .

[43]  Rudolf Arnheim,et al.  The dynamics of architectural form : based on the 1975 Mary Duke Biddle lectures at the Cooper Union , 1977 .

[44]  Ulrich Rs,et al.  Effects of interior design on wellness: theory and recent scientific research. , 1991 .

[45]  R. Wiers,et al.  Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. , 2010, Addiction.

[46]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Weight as an Embodiment of Importance , 2009, Psychological science.

[47]  P. Aggarwal,et al.  Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products , 2007 .

[48]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[49]  J. Bargh,et al.  Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions , 2010, Science.

[50]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[51]  L. Warlop,et al.  Embodied Myopia , 2011 .

[52]  R. Zajonc Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal , 2001 .

[53]  K. Scherer,et al.  Emotion expression in body action and posture. , 2012, Emotion.

[54]  P. Niedenthal Embodying Emotion , 2007, Science.

[55]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[56]  Geke D.S. Ludden,et al.  Surprise As a Design Strategy , 2008, Design Issues.

[57]  J. Bargh,et al.  Keeping One's Distance , 2008, Psychological science.

[58]  G. Burch This is interesting. , 1970, American heart journal.

[59]  E. Stolterman,et al.  The character of things , 1997 .

[60]  R. Gibbs The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding , 1994 .

[61]  A. Pruyn,et al.  A view from the inside: Perspective taking in object perception , 2014 .

[62]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Meanings of Materials , 2012 .

[63]  Wen-chih Chang,et al.  Exploring Types and Characteristics of Product Forms , 2007 .