Da vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points

Distant surfaces are occluded by nearer surfaces to different extents in the two eyes, leading to the existence of unpaired image points visible in one eye and not the other. An ecological analysis of the real world situation that could have given rise to such unpaired points indicates the presence of a depth constraint zone, defined by visibility lines between which possible real world points must lie. The leading edge of this zone starts at the edge of a fused binocular occluding surface and recedes linearly with increases in horizontal distance to the unpaired point. Psychophysical evidence indicates that the human visual system makes use of this unpaired information in a remarkably adaptive manner, showing an increase in perceived depth for increasing horizontal separations between the unpaired target and fused edge, at least over a significant angular range (approx. 25-40 min arc). We also show that unpaired points in binocular images can lead to the formation of subjective occluding contours and surface having the qualitatively appropriate sign of depth. Furthermore, we show that the visual system could not recover depth of unpaired points camouflaged from the other eye against silhouettes. Our findings indicate that the visual system makes use of occlusive relations in the real world to recover depth, contour, and surface from unpaired points. The fact that such processes must utilize eye-of-origin information implies that they share this essential characteristic with classical or Wheatstone stereopsis. The necessity of eye-of-origin information also suggests that the processing may begin relatively early in cortical visual processing, possibly as early as V1. Finally, the novel emergence of subjective occluding contours from unpaired monocular stimuli raises the possibility that this process is mediated by visual experience, built up by the association of unpaired points and occluding contours.

[1]  J I Nelson,et al.  Globality and stereoscopic fusion in binocular vision. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  G Westheimer,et al.  Panum’s phenomenon and the confluence of signals from the two eyes in stereoscopy , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  G. Sperling Binocular Vision: A Physical and a Neural Theory , 1970 .

[4]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[5]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.

[6]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and V2 of ventral extrastriate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Charles Wheatstone On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[9]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Subjective contours, tilt aftereffects, and visual cortical organization , 1989, Vision Research.

[11]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[12]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  An occlusion-related mechanism of depth perception based on motion and interocular sequence , 1988, Nature.

[14]  Martin Kaye,et al.  Stereopsis without binocular correlation , 1978, Vision Research.

[15]  R. Lawson,et al.  Stereopsis and anomalous contour. , 1967, Vision research.

[16]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  G. Kanizsa Margini Quasi-percettivi in Campi con Stimolazione Omogenea , 1955 .

[18]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Pre-stereoptic binocular vision in infants , 1986, Vision Research.

[20]  K. Miller,et al.  Ocular dominance column development: analysis and simulation. , 1989, Science.

[21]  G Mitchison,et al.  Planarity and Segmentation in Stereoscopic Matching , 1988, Perception.

[22]  James A. Anderson,et al.  A simple neural network generating an interactive memory , 1972 .

[23]  C. Malsburg,et al.  How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organization , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[24]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Correlation Matrix Memories , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[25]  S. Coren,et al.  SUBJECTIVE CONTOURS AND APPARENT DEPTH , 2005 .

[26]  B Gillam,et al.  The Role of Monocular Regions in Stereoscopic Displays , 1988, Perception.

[27]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry , 1990, Vision Research.

[28]  I. Rock,et al.  Illusory Contours as the Solution to a Problem , 1979, Perception.

[29]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.