Small variation in dynamic functional connectivity in cerebellar networks

Brain networks can be defined and explored through their connectivity. Here, we analyzed the relationship between structural connectivity (SC) across 2,514 regions that cover the entire brain and brainstem, and their dynamic functional connectivity (DFC). To do so, we focused on a combination of two metrics: the first assesses the degree of SC-DFC similarity and the second is the intrinsic variability of the DFC networks over time. Overall, we found that cerebellar networks have a smaller DFC variability than other networks in the brain. Moreover, the internal structure of the cerebellum could be clearly divided in two distinct posterior and anterior parts, the latter also connected to the brainstem. The mechanism to maintain small variability of the DFC in the posterior part of the cerebellum is consistent with another of our findings, namely, that this structure exhibits the highest SC-DFC similarity relative to the other networks studied. By contrast, the anterior part of the cerebellum also exhibits small DFC variability but it has the lowest SC-DFC similarity, suggesting a different mechanism is at play. Because this structure connects to the brainstem, which regulates sleep cycles, cardiac and respiratory functioning, we suggest that such critical functionality drives the low variability in the DFC. Overall, the low variability detected in DFC expands our current knowledge of cerebellar networks, which are extremely rich and complex, participating in a wide range of cognitive functions, from movement control and coordination to executive function or emotional regulation. Moreover, the association between such low variability and structure suggests that differentiated computational principles can be applied in the cerebellum as opposed to other structures, such as the cerebral cortex.

[1]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  V. Haughton,et al.  Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in "resting-state" data. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  B. Biswal,et al.  Dynamic brain functional connectivity modulated by resting-state networks , 2013, Brain Structure and Function.

[4]  Jorge Sepulcre,et al.  Neurogenetic profiles delineate large-scale connectivity dynamics of the human brain , 2018, Nature Communications.

[5]  Konrad Grützmann,et al.  Author Correction: Variants in exons 5 and 6 of ACTB cause syndromic thrombocytopenia , 2018, Nature Communications.

[6]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Stepwise Connectivity of the Modal Cortex Reveals the Multimodal Organization of the Human Brain , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Catherine J. Stoodley,et al.  Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing , 2010, Cortex.

[9]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Functional boundaries in the human cerebellum revealed by a multi-domain task battery , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  T. S. Monteiro,et al.  Relative cortico-subcortical shift in brain activity but preserved training-induced neural modulation in older adults during bimanual motor learning , 2017, Neurobiology of Aging.

[12]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[13]  Sebastiano Stramaglia,et al.  Extreme brain events: Higher-order statistics of brain resting activity and its relation with structural connectivity , 2015 .

[14]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Cerebellar gray matter explains bimanual coordination performance in children and older adults , 2018, Neurobiology of Aging.

[15]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Consensus clustering approach to group brain connectivity matrices , 2016, Network Neuroscience.

[16]  Keith Heberlein,et al.  Imaging human connectomes at the macroscale , 2013, Nature Methods.

[17]  T. Bachmann,et al.  Still wanted—the mechanisms of consciousness! , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[18]  M. Noroozian The role of the cerebellum in cognition: beyond coordination in the central nervous system. , 2014, Neurologic clinics.

[19]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[20]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[21]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  A whole-brain computational modeling approach to explain the alterations in resting-state functional connectivity during progression of Alzheimer's disease , 2017, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[22]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. , 2010, European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

[23]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Information Transfer and Criticality in the Ising Model on the Human Connectome , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  Sebastiano Stramaglia,et al.  Lagged and instantaneous dynamical influences related to brain structural connectivity , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[26]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2017, NeuroImage.

[28]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics , 2013, NeuroImage.

[29]  E. D’Angelo,et al.  Seeking a unified framework for cerebellar function and dysfunction: from circuit operations to cognition , 2013, Front. Neural Circuits.

[30]  Huafu Chen,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals decreased variability of the default‐mode network in developing autistic brain , 2018, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[31]  DiezIbai,et al.  Information Flow Between Resting-State Networks , 2015 .

[32]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Functional connectivity dynamically evolves on multiple time-scales over a static structural connectome: Models and mechanisms , 2017, NeuroImage.

[33]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Functional connectivity dynamics: Modeling the switching behavior of the resting state , 2015, NeuroImage.

[34]  Michael D. Greicius,et al.  Distinct Cerebellar Contributions to Intrinsic Connectivity Networks , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Sebastiano Stramaglia,et al.  Structure–function multi‐scale connectomics reveals a major role of the fronto‐striato‐thalamic circuit in brain aging , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Transient brain activity disentangles fMRI resting-state dynamics in terms of spatially and temporally overlapping networks , 2015, Nature Communications.

[38]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Structural and Functional Brain Networks: From Connections to Cognition , 2013, Science.

[40]  Selen Atasoy,et al.  Human brain networks function in connectome-specific harmonic waves , 2016, Nature Communications.

[41]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  A note on the phase locking value and its properties , 2013, NeuroImage.

[42]  J. Schmahmann An emerging concept. The cerebellar contribution to higher function. , 1991, Archives of neurology.

[43]  Qian Cui,et al.  Endless Fluctuations: Temporal Dynamics of the Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuations , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[45]  Jeremy D. Schmahmann,et al.  Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  Mehrdad Jafari-Mamaghani,et al.  RipleyGUI: software for analyzing spatial patterns in 3D cell distributions , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[47]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Universal Transform or Multiple Functionality? Understanding the Contribution of the Human Cerebellum across Task Domains , 2019, Neuron.

[48]  G. Deco,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity reveals altered variability in functional connectivity among patients with major depressive disorder , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[49]  Jeremy D. Schmahmann,et al.  Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: An fMRI study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[50]  J. Jansen,et al.  The Comparative Anatomy and Histology of the Cerebellum: The Human Cerebellum, Cerebellar Connections, and Cerebellar Cortex , 1972 .

[51]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Temporal Synchronization Networks Emerge from Connectivity Topology and Heterogeneity , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[52]  Jurgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization in complex networks , 2008, 0805.2976.

[53]  Luca Faes,et al.  Synergetic and redundant information flow detected by unnormalized Granger causality: application to resting state fMRI. , 2015, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[54]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Three‐dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[55]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  A novel brain partition highlights the modular skeleton shared by structure and function , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[56]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Cognitive performance in healthy older adults relates to spontaneous switching between states of functional connectivity during rest , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[57]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Enhanced prefrontal functional–structural networks to support postural control deficits after traumatic brain injury in a pediatric population , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[58]  Maryam Falahpour,et al.  Underconnected, But Not Broken? Dynamic Functional Connectivity MRI Shows Underconnectivity in Autism Is Linked to Increased Intra-Individual Variability Across Time , 2016, Brain Connect..

[59]  Jason S. Nomi,et al.  Intrinsic functional connectivity variance and state‐specific under‐connectivity in autism , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[60]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[61]  Zoran Stanić,et al.  Spectral distances of graphs , 2012 .

[62]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Surface-Based Display of Volume-Averaged Cerebellar Imaging Data , 2015, PloS one.

[64]  Iseult A. M. Beets,et al.  Movement preparation and execution: differential functional activation patterns after traumatic brain injury. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[65]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Changes in brain activation during the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination task , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  H. C. Leiner Solving the Mystery of the Human Cerebellum , 2010, Neuropsychology Review.

[67]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis , 2016 .

[68]  Pan Lin,et al.  Dynamic Default Mode Network across Different Brain States , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[69]  F Debaere,et al.  Cerebellar and premotor function in bimanual coordination: parametric neural responses to spatiotemporal complexity and cycling frequency , 2004, NeuroImage.

[70]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum , 2009, NeuroImage.

[71]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Computer simulation of cerebellar information processing , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[72]  M. Mauk,et al.  What the cerebellum computes , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[73]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[74]  S. Stramaglia,et al.  Patient‐specific computational modeling of cortical spreading depression via diffusion tensor imaging , 2017, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[75]  J. Duysens,et al.  Regional volumes in brain stem and cerebellum are associated with postural impairments in young brain‐injured patients , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[76]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Spectral methods for network community detection and graph partitioning , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[77]  D Marinazzo,et al.  Ising model with conserved magnetization on the human connectome: Implications on the relation structure-function in wakefulness and anesthesia. , 2015, Chaos.

[78]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  On the relationship between instantaneous phase synchrony and correlation-based sliding windows for time-resolved fMRI connectivity analysis , 2017, NeuroImage.