Quality of care and patient outcomes in critical access rural hospitals.

CONTEXT Critical access hospitals (CAHs) play a crucial role in the US rural safety net. Current policy efforts have focused primarily on helping these small, isolated hospitals remain financially viable to ensure access for individuals living in rural areas in the United States; however, little is known about the quality of care they provide or the outcomes their patients achieve. OBJECTIVES To examine the quality of care and patient outcomes at CAHs and to understand why patterns of care might differ for CAHs vs non-CAHs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS A retrospective analysis in 4738 US hospitals of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (10,703 for CAHs vs 469,695 for non-CAHs), congestive heart failure (CHF) (52,927 for CAHs vs 958,790 for non-CAHs), and pneumonia (86,359 for CAHs vs 773,227 for non-CAHs) who were discharged in 2008-2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical capabilities, performance on processes of care, and 30-day mortality rates, adjusted for age, sex, race, and medical comorbidities. RESULTS Compared with other hospitals (n = 3470), 1268 CAHs (26.8%) were less likely to have intensive care units (380 [30.0%] vs 2581 [74.4%], P < .001), cardiac catheterization capabilities (6 [0.5%] vs 1654 [47.7%], P < .001), and at least basic electronic health records (80 [6.5%] vs 445 [13.9%], P < .001). The CAHs had lower performance on processes of care than non-CAHs for all 3 conditions examined (concordance with Hospital Quality Alliance process measures for AMI, 91.0% [95% CI, 89.7%-92.3%] vs 97.8% [95% CI, 97.7%-97.9%]; for CHF, 80.6% [95% CI, 79.2%-82.0%] vs 93.5% [95% CI, 93.3%-93.7%]; and for pneumonia, 89.3% [95% CI, 88.6%-90.0%] vs 93.7% [95% CI, 93.6%-93.9%]; P < .001 for each). Patients admitted to CAHs had higher 30-day mortality rates for each condition than those admitted to non-CAHs (for AMI: 23.5% vs 16.2%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-1.80; P < .001; for CHF: 13.4% vs 10.9%; adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.23-1.32; P < .001; and for pneumonia: 14.1% vs 12.1%; adjusted OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.24; P < .001). CONCLUSION Compared with non-CAHs, CAHs had fewer clinical capabilities, worse measured processes of care, and higher mortality rates for patients with AMI, CHF, or pneumonia.

[1]  Thomas C Ricketts,et al.  How adults' access to outpatient physician services relates to the local supply of primary care physicians in the rural southeast. , 2006, Health services research.

[2]  M. Lipsky,et al.  A comparison of quality of care indicators in urban acute care hospitals and rural critical access hospitals in the United States. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[3]  A. Jha,et al.  Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  K Sheikh,et al.  Urban-rural differences in the quality of care for medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  W. Berry,et al.  Esophagectomy Outcomes at Low-Volume Hospitals: The Association Between Systems Characteristics and Mortality , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[6]  James J. Cimino,et al.  Research Paper: A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: 5 Year Results of the IDEATel Study , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Pengxiang Li,et al.  HIT Implementation in Critical Access Hospitals: Extent of Implementation and Business Strategies Supporting IT Use , 2011, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  A. Jha,et al.  Public reporting of discharge planning and rates of readmissions. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  E John Orav,et al.  The inverse relationship between mortality rates and performance in the Hospital Quality Alliance measures. , 2007, Health affairs.

[11]  Marcia M. Ward,et al.  A network collaboration implementing technology to improve medication dispensing and administration in critical access hospitals , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  A. Jha,et al.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M. Joshi,et al.  Variation in quality of care within health systems. , 2008, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[14]  D Draper,et al.  Hospital characteristics and quality of care. , 1992, JAMA.

[15]  Hannah Paxton,et al.  Association of health information technology and teleintensivist coverage with decreased mortality and ventilator use in critically ill patients. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  I. Moscovice,et al.  Quality-of-care challenges for rural health. , 2000, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[17]  Jalpa A Doshi,et al.  Comparison of the performance of the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category (CMS-HCC) risk adjuster with the charlson and elixhauser comorbidity measures in predicting mortality , 2010, BMC health services research.

[18]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  M. Casey,et al.  Quality improvement strategies and best practices in critical access hospitals. , 2004, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[20]  Patient Assessments and Quality of Care in Rural Hospitals , 2010 .

[21]  B. Virnig,et al.  Medicare-certified home health care: urban-rural differences in utilization. , 2007, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[22]  L. Chan,et al.  Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries. , 2006, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[23]  Richard F MacLehose,et al.  Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction in rural and urban US hospitals. , 2004, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[24]  A. Jha,et al.  Who Has Higher Readmission Rates for Heart Failure, and Why?: Implications for Efforts to Improve Care Using Financial Incentives , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[25]  L. Goldman,et al.  Comparison of change in quality of care between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. , 2008, JAMA.

[26]  P. Heuschmann,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Specialized Stroke Care With Telemedicine Support in Community Hospitals on Behalf of the Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) , 2009, Stroke.

[27]  David W Harless,et al.  Variations in Inpatient Mortality Among Hospitals in Different System Types, 1995 to 2000 , 2009, Medical care.

[28]  Stephen Wilson,et al.  Quality through Collaboration: The Future of Rural Health , 2006 .

[29]  C. Cannon,et al.  Quality of care and in-hospital outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease in rural and urban hospitals (from Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease Program). , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.