Effects of Reflection Prompts When Learning with Hypermedia

In this study the assumption was tested experimentally, whether prompting for reflection will enhance hypermedia learning and transfer. Students of the experimental group were prompted at each navigation step in a hypermedia system to say the reasons why they chose this specific information node out loud whereas the students of the control group learned without reflection prompting. University students (N = 46) participated and were counterbalanced according to their prior knowledge, metacognitive knowledge, and verbal intelligence. The students' task was to learn the concepts of operant conditioning within 35 minutes. Students were completely free in navigation and students' individual learning sessions were videotaped. Immediately afterwards learning outcome was obtained. As expected, students learning with reflection prompts showed better transfer performance compared to the control group, especially if their navigation was based on strategic decisions. Even though prompting for reflection was successful, ways of further optimizing this kind of metacognitive intervention are discussed.

[1]  Marcel V. J. Veenman,et al.  The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned from multi-method designs? , 2005 .

[2]  Fred Paas,et al.  Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students' self-regulated learning competence , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  B. Hofer Epistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching , 2004 .

[4]  M. Bannert,et al.  Effekte metakognitiver Lernhilfen auf den Wissenserwerb in vernetzten Lernumgebungen , 2003 .

[5]  C. Weinstein,et al.  Self-Regulation Interventions with a Focus on Learning Strategies , 2000 .

[6]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[7]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[8]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Designing technology to support reflection , 1999 .

[9]  A. Dillon,et al.  Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style , 1998 .

[10]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[11]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning : from teaching to self-reflective practice , 1998 .

[12]  KIMBERLY A. LAWLESS,et al.  Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation , 1997 .

[13]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Strategy-Specific Information Access in Knowledge Acquisition from Hypertext , 1997 .

[14]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies , 1996 .

[15]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective , 1996 .

[16]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  Lernen lernen und das eigene Lernen verstehen , 1994 .

[17]  P. Robert-Jan Simons,et al.  Self-regulation and computer aided instruction , 1992 .

[18]  Cliff McKnight,et al.  HyperText: A Psychological Perspective , 1992 .

[19]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning , 1990 .

[20]  D. Broadbent,et al.  The role of instruction and verbalization in improving performance on complex search tasks , 1990 .

[21]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.