First and second language similarity can hurt the learning of second-language speech segmentation: The case of prosody

This study investigates whether learning to use prosodic cues to word boundaries in second-language speech segmentation is easier or more difficult if the native and second languages have similar (though non-identical) prosodies than if they have markedly different prosodies. It compares French, Korean, and English listeners’ use of fundamental-frequency rise and lengthening as cues to word-final boundaries in French. Fundamental-frequency rise and lengthening signal word-final boundaries in French and Korean but can signal word-initial boundaries in English. Proficiency-matched Korean-speaking and Englishspeaking second-language learners of French and native French listeners completed a ‘visual-world’ eye-tracking task where fundamental-frequency rise and/or lengthening signaled the final boundary of target words. Results show that the French and English groups used both fundamental-frequency rise and lengthening to locate word-final boundaries in French, whereas the Korean group used only lengthening. We attribute Korean listeners’ non-use of fundamental-frequency rise in French to firstand second-language perceptual assimilation.

[1]  Sun-Ah Jun,et al.  A Phonological Model of French Intonation , 2000 .

[2]  Laurence White,et al.  Segmentation by lexical subtraction in Hungarian speakers of second-language English , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Sahyang Kim,et al.  The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[5]  S. Jun,et al.  The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy , 1998, Phonology.

[6]  P. Lieberman Some Acoustic Correlates of Word Stress in American English , 1959 .

[7]  Pauline Welby,et al.  French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[8]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[9]  Sun-Ah Jun,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean , 1995 .

[10]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[11]  S. Jun,et al.  K-Tobi (Korean ToBI) Labelling Conventions , 2000 .

[12]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[13]  A. Christophea,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I . Adult data q , 2003 .

[14]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Accentual Phrase Boundaries and Lexical Access in French , 2010 .

[15]  Stéphanie Gaillard,et al.  Differential contribution of prosodic cues in the native and non-native segmentation of French speech , 2012 .

[16]  A. Cutler,et al.  Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Flege Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[18]  A. Weber,et al.  First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  C. Fougeron,et al.  Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation , 2002 .

[20]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[21]  Sahyang Kim,et al.  THE USE OF PROSODIC CUES IN LEARNING NEW WORDS IN AN UNFAMILIAR LANGUAGE , 2012, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[22]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[23]  Cynthia G. Clopper Frequency of Stress Patterns in English: A Computational Analysis , 2002 .

[24]  Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words , 1994 .

[25]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[26]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) , 2009 .

[27]  Malte C. Viebahn,et al.  Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  C. Laeufer,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV , 1995 .