Distinct mechanisms explain the control of reach speed planning: evidence from a race model framework.

Previous studies have investigated the computational architecture underlying the voluntary control of reach movements that demands a change in position or direction of movement planning. Here we used a novel task in which subjects had to either increase or decrease the movement speed according to a change in target color that occurred randomly during a trial. The applicability of different race models to such a speed redirect task was assessed. We found that the predictions of an independent race model that instantiated an abort-and-replan strategy was consistent with all aspects of performance in the fast-to-slow speed condition. The results from modeling indicated a peculiar asymmetry, in that although the fast-to-slow speed change required inhibition, none of the standard race models was able to explain how movements changed from slow to fast speeds. Interestingly, a weighted averaging model that simulated the gradual merging of two kinematic plans explained behavior in the slow-to-fast speed task. In summary, our work shows how a race model framework can provide an understanding of how the brain controls different aspects of reach movement planning and help distinguish between an abort-and-replan strategy and merging of plans. NEW & NOTEWORTHY For the first time, a race model framework was used to understand how reach speeds are modified. We provide evidence that a fast-to-slow speed change required aborting the current plan and a complete respecification of a new plan, while none of the race models was able to explain an instructed increase of hand movement speed, which was instead accomplished by a merging of a new kinematic plan with the existing kinematic plan.

[1]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Composition and Decomposition of Internal Models in Motor Learning under Altered Kinematic and Dynamic Environments , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Murthy,et al.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  S. Scott Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Kinematics-to-Dynamics Transformation in the Supplementary Motor Area , 2002, Neuron.

[5]  Aditya Murthy,et al.  Is saccade averaging determined by visual processing or movement planning? , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[7]  Aditya Murthy,et al.  An independent race model involving an abort and re‐plan strategy explains reach redirecting movements during planning and execution , 2018, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  A. Aron From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  R. Aslin,et al.  The amplitude and angle of saccades to double-step target displacements , 1987, Vision Research.

[10]  A. Murthy,et al.  Parallel activation of prospective motor plans during visually‐guided sequential saccades , 2017, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  FEEBACK OR FEEDFORWARD CONTROL : END OF A DICHOTOMY , 2006 .

[13]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Preparing for speed. Focus on "Preparatory activity in premotor and motor cortex reflects the speed of the upcoming reach". , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Logan,et al.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. , 2007, Psychological review.

[15]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  E. Henneman,et al.  PROPERTIES OF MOTOR UNITS IN A HOMOGENEOUS RED MUSCLE (SOLEUS) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  B A J Reddi,et al.  Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision task. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[19]  Aditya Murthy,et al.  Understanding How the Brain Changes Its Mind: Microstimulation in the Macaque Frontal Eye Field Reveals How Saccade Plans Are Changed , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  T. Mima,et al.  Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Sumitash Jana,et al.  Evidence of common and separate eye and hand accumulators underlying flexible eye-hand coordination. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Aditya Murthy,et al.  Covert inhibition potentiates online control in a double-step task. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[23]  J. Summers,et al.  Current status of the motor program: revisited. , 2009, Human movement science.

[24]  R. Carpenter,et al.  The influence of urgency on decision time , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Gopal Santhanam,et al.  Preparatory activity in premotor and motor cortex reflects the speed of the upcoming reach. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[27]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[29]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  R. H. S. Carpenter,et al.  Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements , 1995, Nature.

[31]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Aditya Murthy,et al.  Voluntary control of multisaccade gaze shifts during movement preparation and execution. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[34]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Aditya Murthy,et al.  Eye-hand coordination during a double-step task: evidence for a common stochastic accumulator. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Countermanding saccades in humans , 1999, Vision Research.

[39]  R Iansek,et al.  Current status of the motor program. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[40]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Motor Programming: A Review and Scheduling Theory , 1985 .

[41]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Simple and complex movements in a patient with infarction of the right supplementary motor area , 1986, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.