Effects Of Structural And Perceptual Factors On Attitudes Toward The Website

This study examined effects of structural and perceptual variables on attitude toward websites. Data were collected from 311 consumers who reviewed four hotel websites. The sites were structurally different in terms of having high versus low number of features and also in terms of informational versus transformational creative strategies. Involvement and perceived interactivity were the two perceptual variables examined in the study. Involvement with the subject of a site and the subdimension of perceived interactivity that measured level of engagement were the best predictors of attitude. Positive attitudes were also associated with sites that took advantage of web-specific features such as virtual tours and online reservations systems. A key implication of this study is the need for advertisers and researchers to reconsider advertising in the context of the web. Radio and television required advertisers to adjust to the new concepts of buying and selling time instead of space and of incorporating aural and visual appeals in messages. The web demands that advertisers adjust to a new medium that is not bound by either space or time and that has the technical capability to involve and engage the consumer.This study was funded in part by grants from the University of Tennessee Scholarly Activities Research Initiative Fund (SARIF) and the Department of Advertising and College of Communication at the University of Tennessee.

[1]  Terence A. Shimp Attitude toward the AD as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice , 1981 .

[2]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[3]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[4]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude toward the Ad: A Meta-analysis , 1992 .

[5]  Paul L. Sauer,et al.  The combined influence hypothesis: Central and peripheral antecedents of attitude toward the ad , 1995 .

[6]  Sally J. McMillan Who Pays for Content? Funding in Interactive Media , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites , 1998 .

[8]  S. Sundar,et al.  Does Web Advertising Work? Memory for Print vs. Online Media , 1998 .

[9]  B. Calder,et al.  New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising , 1998 .

[10]  Ronald E. Taylor A Six-Segment Message Strategy Wheel , 1999 .

[11]  Tanjev Schultz,et al.  Interactive Options in Online Journalism: A Content Analysis of 100 U.S. Newspapers , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward the Site , 1999 .

[13]  Chang-Hoan Cho How Advertising Works on the WWW: Modified Elaboration Likelihood Model , 1999 .

[14]  Brian L. Massey,et al.  Interactivity, Online Journalism, and English-Language Web Newspapers in Asia , 1999 .

[15]  D. Stewart,et al.  Measuring the Effects and Effectiveness of Interactive Advertising , 2000 .

[16]  Russell I. Haley,et al.  The ARF Copy Research Validity Project , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[17]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Webpage Background and Viewer Attitudes , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[18]  Anand Kumar,et al.  Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[19]  William D. Wells,et al.  The Dimensions of Commercial Cyberspace , 2000 .

[20]  Shelly Rodgers,et al.  The Interactive Advertising Model , 2000 .

[21]  Prem Shamdasani,et al.  Location, Location, Location: Insights for Advertising Placement on the Web , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[22]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[23]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Interactivity, Information Processing, and Learning on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[24]  Sung-Joon Yoon,et al.  What Makes the Internet a Choice of Advertising Medium , 2001, Electron. Mark..

[25]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  Different Forced-Exposure Levels to Banner Advertisements , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[26]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Effects of Anthropomorphic Agents on Advertising Effectiveness and the Mediating Role of Presence , 2001 .

[27]  Alvin J. Silk,et al.  The Emerging Position of the Internet as an Advertising Medium , 2001 .

[28]  Monica Perry,et al.  Fortune 500 manufacturer web sites: Innovative marketing strategies or cyberbrochures? , 2002 .

[29]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Factors Impacting the Adoption and Effectiveness of the World Wide Web in Marketing , 2002 .

[30]  Sally J. McMillan A four-part model of cyber-interactivity , 2002, New Media Soc..

[31]  Sally J. McMillan,et al.  Corporate Web Sites as Advertising , 2003 .