Optical Imaging with Her2-Targeted Affibody Molecules Can Monitor Hsp90 Treatment Response in a Breast Cancer Xenograft Mouse Model

Purpose: To determine whether optical imaging can be used for in vivo therapy response monitoring as an alternative to radionuclide techniques. For this, we evaluated the known Her2 response to 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin hydrochloride (17-DMAG) treatment, an Hsp90 inhibitor. Experimental Design: After in vitro 17-DMAG treatment response evaluation of MCF7 parental cells and 2 HER2-transfected clones (clone A medium, B high Her2 expression), we established human breast cancer xenografts in nude mice (only parental and clone B) for in vivo evaluation. Mice received 120 mg/kg of 17-DMAG in 4 doses at 12-hour intervals intraperitonially (n = 14) or PBS as carrier control (n = 9). Optical images were obtained both pretreatment (day 0) and posttreatment (day 3, 6, and 9), always 5 hours postinjection of 500 pmol of anti-Her2 Affibody-AlexaFluor680 via tail vein (with preinjection background subtraction). Days 3 and 9 in vivo optical imaging signal was further correlated with ex vivo Her2 levels by Western blot after sacrifice. Results: Her2 expression decreased with 17-DMAG dose in vitro. In vivo optical imaging signal was reduced by 22.5% in clone B (P = 0.003) and by 9% in MCF7 parental tumors (P = 0.23) 3 days after 17-DMAG treatment; optical imaging signal recovered in both tumor types at days 6 to 9. In the carrier group, no signal reduction was observed. Pearson correlation of in vivo optical imaging signal with ex vivo Her2 levels ranged from 0.73 to 0.89. Conclusions: Optical imaging with an affibody can be used to noninvasively monitor changes in Her2 expression in vivo as a response to treatment with an Hsp90 inhibitor, with results similar to response measurements in positron emission tomography imaging studies. Clin Cancer Res; 18(4); 1073–81. ©2012 AACR.

[1]  S. Lindquist,et al.  HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  Bernhard Brendel,et al.  Diffuse optical tomography of the breast: preliminary findings of a new prototype and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging , 2009, European Radiology.

[3]  X. Intes Time-domain optical mammography SoftScan: initial results. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[4]  L. Martiniova,et al.  [18F]FBEM-ZHER2:342-Affibody molecule—a new molecular tracer for in vivo monitoring of HER2 expression by positron emission tomography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  C. Cordon-Cardo,et al.  17-Allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin induces the degradation of androgen receptor and HER-2/neu and inhibits the growth of prostate cancer xenografts. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[7]  V. Prasad,et al.  Molecular Imaging of HER2-Expressing Malignant Tumors in Breast Cancer Patients Using Synthetic 111In- or 68Ga-Labeled Affibody Molecules , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  T. Helbich,et al.  Characterization of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions With Computed Tomography Laser Mammography (CTLM): Initial Experience , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[9]  Lyndsay N Harris,et al.  Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Heidrun Wabnitz,et al.  Scanning Time-domain Optical Mammography: Detection and Characterization of Breast Tumors In Vivo , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[11]  Craig S. Levin,et al.  A Comparison Between a Time Domain and Continuous Wave Small Animal Optical Imaging System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  S. Stone-Elander,et al.  On the Selection of a Tracer for PET Imaging of HER2-Expressing Tumors: Direct Comparison of a 124I-Labeled Affibody Molecule and Trastuzumab in a Murine Xenograft Model , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Huang,et al.  Benign versus malignant breast masses: optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction. , 2005, Radiology.

[14]  S. Gambhir,et al.  A 2-Helix Small Protein Labeled with 68Ga for PET Imaging of HER2 Expression , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  D. Hedley,et al.  Targeting focal adhesion kinase with dominant-negative FRNK or Hsp90 inhibitor 17-DMAG suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of SiHa cervical xenografts. , 2009, Cancer research.

[16]  M. Moasser The oncogene HER2: its signaling and transforming functions and its role in human cancer pathogenesis , 2007, Oncogene.

[17]  B. Pogue,et al.  Evaluation of breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tomographic diffuse optical spectroscopy: case studies of tumor region-of-interest changes. , 2009, Radiology.

[18]  J. Capala,et al.  Molecular imaging of HER2-positive breast cancer: a step toward an individualized ‘image and treat’ strategy , 2010, Current opinion in oncology.

[19]  V. Chernomordik,et al.  Affibody Molecules for In vivo Characterization of HER2-Positive Tumors by Near-Infrared Imaging , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  Marjolein van der Voort,et al.  A Novel Fluorescent Imaging Agent for Diffuse Optical Tomography of the Breast: First Clinical Experience in Patients , 2009, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[21]  Michael Rugaard Jensen,et al.  (89)Zr-trastuzumab PET visualises HER2 downregulation by the HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 in a human tumour xenograft. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[22]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[23]  X. Intes Time-Domain Optical Mammography SoftScan , 2005 .

[24]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[25]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Small-Animal PET Imaging of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Expression with Site-Specific 18F-Labeled Protein Scaffold Molecules , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  S. Gautam,et al.  Identification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging--comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findings. , 2010, Radiology.

[28]  S. Larson,et al.  Early tumor response to Hsp90 therapy using HER2 PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  A. Citri,et al.  Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG reduces ErbB2 levels and inhibits proliferation of the trastuzumab resistant breast tumor cell line JIMT-1. , 2006, Immunology letters.

[30]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Shedding light onto live molecular targets , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[31]  Rebecca Richards-Kortum,et al.  Optical contrast agents and imaging systems for detection and diagnosis of cancer , 2008, International journal of cancer.