Influence of Aircraft Maneuver Preference Variability on Airspace Usage

Human factors constitute a core aspect of air traffic control concepts and must be addressed when dealing with traffic flow stability problems. This paper aims to evaluate how the usage of airspace depends on the degree of flexibility in pilot decision-making. Specifically, we study the airspace usage of two intersecting flows of aircraft when pilot maneuver preferences vary. The amount of airspace required for the two flows to cross without conflict can reveal certain aspects of traffic complexity of this specific traffic pattern. To simplify the analysis, we use models of instantaneous lateral and longitudinal position changes to approximate the heading-change and speed-change maneuvers of the aircraft, respectively. Pilot preferences, which are expressed as preferred heading or speed changes, are reflected by different penalty functions of position displacements that the pilots attempt to minimize during conflict resolution. Under the same pilot preferences, the aircraft flow stability is preserved using a decentralized conflict-resolution scheme. However, when the pilot preferences are allowed to vary so that individual aircraft have more control freedom in conflict resolution, the intersecting flows require a much larger fraction of airspace to ensure conflict-free and stable flows of aircraft.

[1]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Stability and performance of intersecting aircraft flows under decentralized conflict avoidance rules , 2001, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[2]  Mark Peters,et al.  Conflict Detection and Resolution for Free Flight , 1997 .

[3]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Airspace Complexity and its Application in Air Traffic Management , 1998 .

[4]  Rob C J Ruigrok,et al.  Human factors evaluations of Free Flight Issues solved and issues remaining. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  P. Ky,et al.  SESAR : towards the new generation of air traffic management systems in Europe , 2006 .

[6]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Deconstructing Complexity in Air Traffic Control , 2005 .

[7]  Amy R. Pritchett,et al.  Describing Airspace Complexity: Airspace Response to Disturbances , 2009 .

[8]  Dennis B. Beringer Collision Avoidance Response Stereotypes in Pilots and Nonpilots , 1978, Human factors.

[9]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Near Real-Time Fuel-Optimal En Route Conflict Resolution , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Shawn R. Wolfe Supporting Air Traffic Flow Management with Agents , 2007, Interaction Challenges for Intelligent Assistants.

[11]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Space Partition for Conflict Resolution of Intersecting Flows of Mobile Agents , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  John Moore,et al.  Air traffic functions in the NextGen and SESAR airspace , 2009, 2009 IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[13]  George L. Donohue,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Airspace Complexity for Air Traffic Controller Workload-Based Sectorization , 2004 .

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Pilot Maneuver Choice and Workload in Free Flight , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Liangfu Peng,et al.  Study on the Model for Horizontal Escape Maneuvers in TCAS , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Decoupled conflict-resolution procedures for decentralized air traffic control , 2011, 2009 IEEE Control Applications, (CCA) & Intelligent Control, (ISIC).

[17]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Automation in Future Air Traffic Management: Effects of Decision Aid Reliability on Controller Performance and Mental Workload , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Vikrant Sharma,et al.  Transfer Time Complexity of Conflict-free Vehicle Routing with no Communications , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Stability of intersecting aircraft flows using heading-change maneuvers for conflict avoidance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Structural considerations and cognitive complexity in air traffic control , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[21]  Inseok Hwang,et al.  Intent-Based Probabilistic Conflict Detection for the Next Generation Air Transportation System , 2008, Proc. IEEE.

[22]  D. Iamratanakul,et al.  Quantification of airspace sector capacity using decentralized conflict resolution procedures , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[23]  Mieczyslaw M. Kokar,et al.  On the Use of $Q^{2}$ Abstractions to Lower the Computational Cost of Derivation of Conflict Resolution Advisories in Air Traffic Control , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  A. Pritchett,et al.  Operational concepts for closely spaced parallel approaches , 1999, Gateway to the New Millennium. 18th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH37033).

[25]  Joseph S. B. Mitchell,et al.  Capacity Estimation for Airspaces with Convective Weather Constraints , 2007 .

[26]  Karl D. Bilimoria,et al.  Comparison of Centralized and Decentralized Conflict Resolution Strategies for Multiple-Aircraft Problems , 2000 .

[27]  Joseph S. B. Mitchell,et al.  SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF CENTRALIZED AND DECENTRALIZED AIR TRAFFIC SEPARATION STRATEGIES , 2001 .

[28]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Concept for Next Generation Air Traffic Control System , 2002 .

[29]  Kyle Treleaven,et al.  Conflict Resolution and Traffic Complexity of Multiple Intersecting Flows of Aircraft , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[30]  Joseph S. B. Mitchell,et al.  Maximum Flow Rates for Capacity Estimation in Level Flight with Convective Weather Constraints , 2007 .

[31]  Nicolas Durand,et al.  FACES: A Free Flight Autonomous and Coordinated Embarked Solver , 1998 .