Knowledge representation and the dimensions of a multi-model relationship

The exchange of data between different models in a multi-simulation environment is about the exchange of information from within the context of two separate worldviews. This amounts to knowledge (information in context). To represent this knowledge, in any of a number of different ways (meta-data, ontological reference, frames, etc.) there must be a method to bridge the gap between what the worldview of origination can represent and what the worldview of destination can receive. This requires some understanding of the dimensions of difference between the two worldviews. As each separate model is the product of a different perspective by the model¿s developer, each individual model will have a different worldview. Understanding what these differences are, and viewing them in light of the requirements for conceptual interoperability will contribute a great teal to the knowledge that must be captured for meaningful exchange.

[1]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of the history of logic , 2004 .

[2]  Ronald J. Brachman,et al.  An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model , 2003 .

[4]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Improving the Composability of Department of Defense Models and Simulations , 2004 .

[5]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Logic and the Modalities in the Twentieth Century , 2006, Handbook of the History of Logic.

[6]  Galia Angelova,et al.  From Conceptual Structures to Semantic Interoperability of Content , 2007, ICCS.

[7]  Bernhard Ganter,et al.  Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.

[9]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics , 2000, ICCS.

[10]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993 .

[11]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Theory of modeling and simulation , 1976 .

[12]  Keith Devlin,et al.  Situation theory and situation semantics , 2006, Logic and the Modalities in the Twentieth Century.

[13]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Modeling & Simulation-Based Data Engineering: Introducing Pragmatics into Ontologies for Net-Centric Information Exchange , 2007 .

[14]  David Cohen,et al.  Interoperability Context-Setting Framework , 2007 .

[15]  Andres Sousa-Poza,et al.  Pragmatic idealism as the basis for understanding complex domains: the trinity and SOSE , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[16]  Daniel Plakosh,et al.  System of Systems Interoperability (SOSI): Final Report , 2004 .

[17]  Alvin S. Lim,et al.  Requirements and design principles for multisimulation with multiresolution, multistage multimodels , 2007, 2007 Winter Simulation Conference.

[18]  Leslie S. Winters,et al.  Composable M&S Web Services for Net-Centric Applications , 2006 .