Deep Learning Identifies High-z Galaxies in a Central Blue Nugget Phase in a Characteristic Mass Range

We use machine learning to identify in color images of high-redshift galaxies an astrophysical phenomenon predicted by cosmological simulations. This phenomenon, called the blue nugget (BN) phase, is the compact star-forming phase in the central regions of many growing galaxies that follows an earlier phase of gas compaction and is followed by a central quenching phase. We train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with mock "observed" images of simulated galaxies at three phases of evolution: pre-BN, BN and post-BN, and demonstrate that the CNN successfully retrieves the three phases in other simulated galaxies. We show that BNs are identified by the CNN within a time window of $\sim0.15$ Hubble times. When the trained CNN is applied to observed galaxies from the CANDELS survey at $z=1-3$, it successfully identifies galaxies at the three phases. We find that the observed BNs are preferentially found in galaxies at a characteristic stellar mass range, $10^{9.2-10.3} M_\odot$ at all redshifts. This is consistent with the characteristic galaxy mass for BNs as detected in the simulations, and is meaningful because it is revealed in the observations when the direct information concerning the total galaxy luminosity has been eliminated from the training set. This technique can be applied to the classification of other astrophysical phenomena for improved comparison of theory and observations in the era of large imaging surveys and cosmological simulations.

[1]  B. J. Weiner,et al.  accepted to the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY MERGERS AND MORPHOLOGY AT Z < 1.2 IN THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP , 2007 .

[2]  Garth D. Illingworth,et al.  Confirmation of the Remarkable Compactness of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at z ~ 2.3: Early-Type Galaxies Did not Form in a Simple Monolithic Collapse , 2008, 0802.4094.

[3]  Christopher E. Moody,et al.  CANDELS+3D-HST: COMPACT SFGs AT z ∼ 2–3, THE PROGENITORS OF THE FIRST QUIESCENT GALAXIES , 2013, 1311.5559.

[4]  Sander Dieleman,et al.  Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction , 2015, ArXiv.

[5]  S. Faber,et al.  Evolution of galaxy shapes from prolate to oblate through compaction events , 2015, 1512.06268.

[6]  Jose Luis. Sersic,et al.  Atlas de Galaxias Australes , 1968 .

[7]  A. Kravtsov On the Origin of the Global Schmidt Law of Star Formation , 2003, astro-ph/0303240.

[8]  V. Villar,et al.  UV-TO-FIR ANALYSIS OF SPITZER/IRAC SOURCES IN THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP. I. MULTI-WAVELENGTH PHOTOMETRY AND SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS , 2011, 1101.3308.

[9]  L. Ho,et al.  Detailed structural decomposition of galaxy images , 2002, astro-ph/0204182.

[10]  Guillermo Barro,et al.  Compaction and quenching of high-z galaxies in cosmological simulations: blue and red nuggets , 2014, 1412.4783.

[11]  C. Carollo,et al.  SURFACE DENSITY EFFECTS IN QUENCHING: CAUSE OR EFFECT? , 2016, 1604.06459.

[12]  A. Dressler,et al.  RETURN TO [Log-]NORMALCY: RETHINKING QUENCHING, THE STAR FORMATION MAIN SEQUENCE, AND PERHAPS MUCH MORE , 2016, 1604.00016.

[13]  A. Klypin,et al.  Adaptive Refinement Tree: A New High-Resolution N-Body Code for Cosmological Simulations , 1997, astro-ph/9701195.

[14]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[15]  Stefano Casertano,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3754.

[16]  Extremely compact massive galaxies at z ~ 1.4 , 2006, astro-ph/0608657.

[17]  A. Dekel,et al.  Radiative feedback and the low efficiency of galaxy formation in low-mass haloes at high redshift , 2013, 1307.0943.

[18]  J. Primack,et al.  Accelerating dust temperature calculations with graphics-processing units , 2009, 0907.3768.

[19]  Ankur Taly,et al.  Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks , 2017, ICML.

[20]  Kirpal Nandra,et al.  CANDELS MULTI-WAVELENGTH CATALOGS: SOURCE DETECTION AND PHOTOMETRY IN THE GOODS-SOUTH FIELD , 2013, 1308.4405.

[21]  H. Rix,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Rapid Decline of the Cosmic Star Formation Rate , 2005, astro-ph/0502246.

[22]  A. Koekemoer,et al.  GALAXY STRUCTURE AND MODE OF STAR FORMATION IN THE SFR–MASS PLANE FROM z ∼ 2.5 TO z ∼ 0.1 , 2011, 1107.0317.

[23]  O. Fèvre,et al.  The evolution of the mass-size relation for early type galaxies from z 1 to the present: dependence on environment, mass-range and detailed morphology , 2012, 1207.5793.

[24]  J. Starck,et al.  The reversal of the star formation-density relation in the distant universe , 2007, astro-ph/0703653.

[25]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.

[26]  Santiago,et al.  A CATALOG OF VISUAL-LIKE MORPHOLOGIES IN THE 5 CANDELS FIELDS USING DEEP LEARNING , 2015, 1509.05429.

[27]  S. Wuyts,et al.  Millimeter Mapping at z ∼ 1: Dust-obscured Bulge Building and Disk Growth , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[28]  D. Elbaz,et al.  Interpreting the Cosmic Infrared Background: Constraints on the Evolution of the Dust-enshrouded Star Formation Rate , 2001, astro-ph/0103067.

[29]  E. Dwek The Evolution of the Elemental Abundances in the Gas and Dust Phases of the Galaxy , 1997, astro-ph/9707024.

[30]  O. Ilbert,et al.  NEWLY QUENCHED GALAXIES AS THE CAUSE FOR THE APPARENT EVOLUTION IN AVERAGE SIZE OF THE POPULATION , 2013, 1302.5115.

[31]  R. Ellis,et al.  CAN MINOR MERGING ACCOUNT FOR THE SIZE GROWTH OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES? NEW RESULTS FROM THE CANDELS SURVEY , 2011, 1110.1637.

[32]  C. Carollo,et al.  The confinement of star-forming galaxies into a main sequence through episodes of gas compaction, depletion and replenishment , 2015, 1509.02529.

[33]  L. Dunne,et al.  SCUBA observations of galaxies with metallicity measurements: a new method for determining the relation between submillimetre luminosity and dust mass , 2002, astro-ph/0204519.

[34]  L. Hernquist,et al.  Massive close pairs measure rapid galaxy assembly in mergers at high redshift , 2016, 1610.01156.

[35]  N. R. Tanvir,et al.  Galaxy morphology to I = 25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field , 1996 .

[36]  Evidence for mature bulges and an inside-out quenching phase 3 billion years after the Big Bang , 2015, Science.

[37]  A. Klypin,et al.  THE ROLE OF STELLAR FEEDBACK IN THE FORMATION OF GALAXIES , 2007, 0712.3285.

[38]  Jr.,et al.  The Global Schmidt law in star forming galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9712213.

[39]  A. Dekel,et al.  Formation of elongated galaxies with low masses at high redshift , 2015, 1504.04988.

[40]  B. Draine,et al.  Infrared Emission from Interstellar Dust. IV. The Silicate-Graphite-PAH Model in the Post-Spitzer Era , 2006, astro-ph/0608003.

[41]  A. Fontana,et al.  A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT METHODS: A CANDELS INVESTIGATION , 2013, 1308.5353.

[42]  B. Groves,et al.  High-resolution panchromatic spectral models of galaxies including photoionization and dust , 2009, 0906.2156.

[43]  G. Chabrier Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function , 2003, astro-ph/0304382.

[44]  H. D. S'anchez,et al.  Improving galaxy morphologies for SDSS with Deep Learning , 2017, 1711.05744.

[45]  Matthew A. Bershady,et al.  The asymmetry of galaxies: physical morphology for nearby and high redshift galaxies , 1999 .

[46]  C. Carollo,et al.  Evolution of density profiles in high-z galaxies: compaction and quenching inside-out , 2015, 1509.00017.

[47]  D. Elbaz,et al.  A PHYSICAL APPROACH TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-Z MERGERS: MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION IN THE STELLAR MASS DOMAIN , 2015, 1503.06220.

[48]  Mark Dickinson,et al.  Size Evolution of the Most Massive Galaxies at 1.7 < z < 3 from GOODS NICMOS Survey Imaging , 2008, 0807.4141.

[49]  Daniel Ceverino,et al.  FORMATION OF MASSIVE GALAXIES AT HIGH REDSHIFT: COLD STREAMS, CLUMPY DISKS, AND COMPACT SPHEROIDS , 2009, 0901.2458.

[50]  P. Jonsson sunrise: polychromatic dust radiative transfer in arbitrary geometries , 2006, astro-ph/0604118.

[51]  Carnegie,et al.  CANDELS: THE PROGENITORS OF COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2012, 1206.5000.

[52]  J. Trump,et al.  Structural and Star-forming Relations since z ∼ 3: Connecting Compact Star-forming and Quiescent Galaxies , 2015, 1509.00469.

[53]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  Galaxy merger morphologies and time-scales from simulations of equal-mass gas-rich disc mergers , 2008, 0805.1246.

[54]  C. Conselice,et al.  Mass assembly and morphological transformations since z ∼ 3 from CANDELS , 2016, 1606.04952.

[55]  J. Trump,et al.  SUB-KILOPARSEC ALMA IMAGING OF COMPACT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2.5: REVEALING THE FORMATION OF DENSE GALACTIC CORES IN THE PROGENITORS OF COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES , 2016, 1607.01011.

[56]  Christopher E. Moody,et al.  Diverse structural evolution at z > 1 in cosmologically simulated galaxies , 2014, 1409.1583.

[57]  E. Decenciere,et al.  Deep learning for galaxy surface brightness profile fitting , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[58]  A. Dekel,et al.  METALLICITY-DEPENDENT QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION AT HIGH REDSHIFT IN SMALL GALAXIES , 2011, 1106.0301.