Piloted Simulator Evaluation of Safe Flight Envelope Display Indicators for Loss of Control Avoidance

In recent studies, it has been observed that loss of control in flight is the most frequent primary cause of accidents. One of the technologies that will significantly reduce the risk of loss of control accidents is onboard safe flight envelope estimation. An efficient method for estimating the safe flight envelope for impaired aircraft has been implemented and evaluated in piloted simulations. This modular method is based on a physical approach. The aerodynamic system parameters are estimated from realistic noisy sensor measurements based on a probabilistic approach. These parameters are then used for efficient model-based computations of the trim envelope as a set of equilibrium points that can be attained by means of admissible inputs. The safe maneuverability limitations are extended beyond the trim envelope through a robust reachability analysis derived from an optimal control formulation. These trim and maneuvering envelope limits can be used for multiple purposes. For example, they can be conveyed ...

[1]  Ian M. Mitchell The Flexible, Extensible and Efficient Toolbox of Level Set Methods , 2008, J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  Jan Albert Mulder,et al.  Adaptive Nonlinear Flight Control and Control Allocation for Failure Resilience , 2011 .

[3]  E. V. Oort,et al.  Maneuver Envelope Determination through Reachability Analysis , 2011 .

[4]  K. Wheeler,et al.  Autonomous Flight Envelope Estimation for Loss-of-Control Prevention , 2017 .

[5]  Christine M. Belcastro,et al.  Validation of Safety-Critical Systems for Aircraft Loss-of-Control Prevention and Recovery , 2012 .

[6]  Jeffrey Keller,et al.  Aircraft Flight Envelope Determination using Upset Detection and Physical Modeling Methods , 2009 .

[7]  Harry G. Kwatny,et al.  Safe Set Maneuverability of Impaired Aircraft , 2012 .

[8]  John Kaneshige,et al.  Safe Maneuvering Envelope Estimation Based on a Physical Approach , 2013 .

[9]  Peter J Seiler,et al.  Reachability and Region of Attraction Analysis Applied to GTM Dynamic Flight Envelope Assessment , 2009 .

[10]  John Lygeros,et al.  On reachability and minimum cost optimal control , 2004, Autom..

[11]  Mario G. Perhinschi,et al.  Integrated Framework for Aircraft Sub-System Failure Detection, Identification, and Evaluation Based on the Artificial Immune System Paradigm , 2009 .

[12]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Aircraft Mode and Energy-State Prediction, Assessment, and Alerting , 2017 .

[13]  Christine M. Belcastro,et al.  Loss of Control Prevention and Recovery: Onboard Guidance, Control, and Systems Technologies , 2012 .

[14]  Christine M. Belcastro,et al.  Preliminary Analysis of Aircraft Loss of Control Accidents: Worst Case Precursor Combinations and Temporal Sequencing , 2014 .

[15]  Mario G. Perhinschi,et al.  In-Flight Actuator Failure Detection and Identification for a Reduced Size UAV Using the Artificial Immune System Approach , 2009 .

[16]  Prasenjit Sengupta,et al.  Onboard Estimation of Impaired Aircraft Performance Envelope , 2011 .

[17]  Jean-Etienne T. Dongmo,et al.  Aircraft Accident Prevention: Loss-of-Control Analysis , 2009 .

[18]  Barton J Bacon,et al.  Quaternion-Based Control Architecture for Determining Controllability/Maneuverability Limits , 2012 .

[19]  Eric Y. Reichenbach,et al.  Dynamic Flight Envelope Assessment and Prediction , 2008 .

[20]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  Flight Test Evaluation of a Run-time Stability Margin Estimation Tool , 2009 .

[21]  H. J. Damveld,et al.  Envelope Determination of Damaged Aircraft , 2012 .

[22]  Jan Albert Mulder,et al.  Pseudo Control Hedging and its Application for Safe Flight Envelope Protection , 2010 .

[23]  E. V. Oort,et al.  Online Aerodynamic Model Structure Selection and Parameter Estimation for Fault Tolerant Control , 2010 .

[24]  J. A. Mulder,et al.  Real Time Damaged Aircraft Model Identification for Reconfiguring Flight Control , 2007 .

[25]  Jianhua Ge,et al.  Methodologies for Adaptive Flight Envelope Estimation and Protection , 2009 .

[26]  Christine M. Belcastro,et al.  Aircraft Loss-of-Control Accident Analysis , 2010 .

[27]  John Kaneshige,et al.  An Adaptive Nonlinear Aircraft Maneuvering Envelope Estimation Approach for Online Applications , 2014 .

[28]  Jan Albert Mulder,et al.  Nonlinear Reconfiguring Flight Control Based on Online Physical Model Identification , 2009 .

[29]  John Kaneshige,et al.  On-Line Safe Flight Envelope Determination for Impaired Aircraft , 2015 .

[30]  Gertjan Looye,et al.  Design and simulation of fault tolerant flight control based on a physical approach , 2012 .

[31]  Jong-Yeob Shin,et al.  Robustness Analysis and Reliable Flight Regime Estimation of an Integrated Resilent Control System for A Transport Aircraft , 2008 .

[32]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Piloted Simulator Evaluation of Maneuvering Envelope Information for Flight Crew Awareness , 2015 .

[33]  Joshua D. Redding,et al.  An Adaptive Fault Management (AFM) System for Resilient Flight Control , 2009 .

[34]  A. V. Khramtsovsky,et al.  Computational framework for investigation of aircraft nonlinear dynamics , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[35]  A. V. Khramtsovsky,et al.  Evaluation of Aircraft Performance and Maneuverability by Computation of Attainable Equilibrium Sets , 2008 .

[36]  John Lygeros,et al.  Launch-pad Abort Flight Envelope Computation for a Personnel Launch Vehicle Using Reachability , 2005 .

[37]  Q. P. Chu,et al.  Modular flight control reconfiguration design and simulation , 2011 .

[38]  Gaurav Bajpai,et al.  Safe Set Protection and Restoration for Unimpaired and Impaired Aircraft , 2012 .