Ant groups optimally amplify the effect of transiently informed individuals

To cooperatively transport a large load, it is important that carriers conform in their efforts and align their forces. A downside of behavioural conformism is that it may decrease the group's responsiveness to external information. Combining experiment and theory, we show how ants optimize collective transport. On the single-ant scale, optimization stems from decision rules that balance individuality and compliance. Macroscopically, these rules poise the system at the transition between random walk and ballistic motion where the collective response to the steering of a single informed ant is maximized. We relate this peak in response to the divergence of susceptibility at a phase transition. Our theoretical models predict that the ant-load system can be transitioned through the critical point of this mesoscopic system by varying its size; we present experiments supporting these predictions. Our findings show that efficient group-level processes can arise from transient amplification of individual-based knowledge.

[1]  J. Munkres ALGORITHMS FOR THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSIORTATION tROBLEMS* , 1957 .

[2]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Individual Rules for Trail Pattern Formation in Argentine Ants (Linepithema humile) , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  G. Dell’Omo,et al.  Flock flying improves pigeons' homing: GPS track analysis of individual flyers versus small groups , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Spring Berman,et al.  Experimental Study and Modeling of Group Retrieval in Ants as an Approach to Collective Transport in Swarm Robotic Systems , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  J. Trager,et al.  A revision of the genus Paratrechina of the continental United States. , 1984 .

[6]  Reinhard Lipowsky,et al.  Bacterial twitching motility is coordinated by a two-dimensional tug-of-war with directional memory , 2014, Nature Communications.

[7]  G. Beugnon,et al.  Prey weight and overwhelming difficulty impact the choice of retrieval strategy in the Neotropical ant Gnamptogenys sulcata (F. Smith) , 2007, Insectes Sociaux.

[8]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  H. McCreery,et al.  Cooperative transport in ants: a review of proximate mechanisms , 2014, Insectes Sociaux.

[10]  E. Morgan,et al.  Chemical secretions of the crazy ant Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2005 .

[11]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Simple rules result in the adaptive turning of food items to reduce drag during cooperative food transport in the ant Pheidole oxyops , 2010, Insectes Sociaux.

[12]  Andrea Cavagna,et al.  Information transfer and behavioural inertia in starling flocks , 2013, Nature Physics.

[13]  Mac Schwager,et al.  Multi-robot Manipulation Without Communication , 2014, DARS.

[14]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[15]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  Leaders, followers, and group decision-making , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.

[16]  S. Robson,et al.  Transient division of labor and behavioral specialization in the ant Formica schaufussi , 2002, Naturwissenschaften.

[17]  Jorge Hidalgo,et al.  Information-based fitness and the emergence of criticality in living systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Tomer J. Czaczkes,et al.  Cooperative transport in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and elsewhere , 2013 .

[19]  Anna Zafeiris,et al.  Group performance is maximized by hierarchical competence distribution , 2013, Nature Communications.

[20]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  A. Cavagna,et al.  Finite-size scaling as a way to probe near-criticality in natural swarms. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[22]  Matthew S Turner,et al.  Role of projection in the control of bird flocks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.

[24]  Melanie J. I. Müller,et al.  Tug-of-war as a cooperative mechanism for bidirectional cargo transport by molecular motors , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  R Wehner,et al.  Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  A. Yamamoto,et al.  Fragmentation or Transportation: Mode of Large-Prey Retrieval in Arboreal and Ground Nesting Ants , 2008, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[28]  Kevin M Schultz,et al.  The mechanism of flight guidance in honeybee swarms: subtle guides or streaker bees? , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  Learning from the behavior of others : conformity, fads, and informational cascades , 1998 .

[30]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  Spring Berman,et al.  Design of ant-inspired stochastic control policies for collective transport by robotic swarms , 2014, Swarm Intelligence.

[32]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  W. Bialek,et al.  Social interactions dominate speed control in poising natural flocks near criticality , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  H. Markl,et al.  Recruitment and food-retrieving behavior in Novomessor (Formicidae, Hymenoptera) , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S12 Table S1 Full Reference List , 2022 .

[36]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing , 2006, Current Biology.

[37]  N. Franks,et al.  Knowledgeable individuals lead collective decisions in ants , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[38]  Claire Detrain,et al.  Accuracy of leadership and control of the audience in the pavement ant Tetramorium caespitum , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The blind leading the blind in army ant raid patterns: Testing a model of self-organization (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1991, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[40]  J H Sudd The transport of prey by ants. , 1965, Behaviour.

[41]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  W. Bialek,et al.  Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality? , 2010, 1012.2242.

[43]  Colin R. Twomey,et al.  Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[45]  K. Laland,et al.  Social learning of a novel avoidance task in the guppy: conformity and social release , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  F. A. Miles Multisensory control in insect oculomotor systems , 2003 .

[47]  R. L. Day,et al.  Interactions between shoal size and conformity in guppy social foraging , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  Insect Swarms Go Critical , 2014 .

[49]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Prey escorting behavior and possible convergent evolution of foraging recruitment mechanisms in an invasive ant , 2013 .

[50]  Chih-Han Yu,et al.  Collective decision-making in multi-agent systems by implicit leadership , 2010, AAMAS.

[51]  K. Laland,et al.  Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy , 1998 .

[52]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Navigation in human crowds; testing the many-wrongs principle , 2009, Animal Behaviour.