LiGAPS-Beef, a mechanistic model to explore potential and feed-limited beef production 1: model description and illustration.

The expected increase in the global demand for livestock products calls for insight in the scope to increase actual production levels across the world. This insight can be obtained by using theoretical concepts of production ecology. These concepts distinguish three production levels for livestock: potential (i.e. theoretical maximum) production, which is defined by genotype and climate only; feed-limited production, which is limited by feed quantity and quality; and actual production. The difference between the potential or limited production and the actual production is the yield gap. The objective of this paper, the first in a series of three, is to present a mechanistic, dynamic model simulating potential and feed-limited production for beef cattle, which can be used to assess yield gaps. A novelty of this model, named LiGAPS-Beef (Livestock simulator for Generic analysis of Animal Production Systems - Beef cattle), is the identification of the defining factors (genotype and climate) and limiting factors (feed quality and available feed quantity) for cattle growth by integrating sub-models on thermoregulation, feed intake and digestion, and energy and protein utilisation. Growth of beef cattle is simulated at the animal and herd level. The model is designed to be applicable to different beef production systems across the world. Main model inputs are breed-specific parameters, daily weather data, information about housing, and data on feed quality and quantity. Main model outputs are live weight gain, feed intake and feed efficiency (FE) at the animal and herd level. Here, the model is presented, and its use is illustrated for Charolais and Brahman × Shorthorn cattle in France and Australia. Potential and feed-limited production were assessed successfully, and we show that FE of herds is highest for breeds most adapted to the local climate conditions. LiGAPS-Beef also identified the factors that define and limit growth and production of cattle. Hence, we argue the model has scope to be used as a tool for the assessment and analysis of yield gaps in beef production systems.

[1]  H. van Keulen,et al.  The 'School of de Wit' crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. , 1996 .

[2]  J. Donnelly,et al.  GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS , 1997 .

[3]  J. M. Bruce,et al.  AP—Animal Production Technology: A Model of the Thermal Balance for Cattle in Hot Conditions , 2000 .

[4]  Walter A.H. Rossing,et al.  Resource use efficiency and farm productivity gaps of smallholder dairy farming in North-west Michoacán, Mexico , 2014 .

[5]  C. Field,et al.  Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. , 2009 .

[6]  P. Faverdin,et al.  GrazeIn: a model of herbage intake and milk production for grazing dairy cows. 1. Prediction of intake capacity, voluntary intake and milk production during lactation , 2011 .

[7]  H. Burrow,et al.  Importance of adaptation and genotype × environment interactions in tropical beef breeding systems. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[8]  M C Rufino,et al.  Lifetime productivity of dairy cows in smallholder farming systems of the Central highlands of Kenya. , 2009, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[9]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts of beef production systems: A review of life cycle assessments , 2015 .

[10]  M. Herrero,et al.  Yield gap analyses to estimate attainable bovine milk yields and evaluate options to increase production in Ethiopia and India , 2017, Agricultural systems.

[11]  D. Fox,et al.  Adjusting Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle for Animal and Environmental Variations , 1988 .

[12]  C. Ferrell,et al.  Lactation characteristics of nine breeds of cattle fed various quantities of dietary energy. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[13]  Ilias Kyriazakis,et al.  DESCRIBING AND PREDICTING POTENTIAL GROWTH IN THE PIG , 2004 .

[14]  G.W.J. van de Ven,et al.  Concepts in production ecology for analysis and design of animal and plant–animal production systems , 2003 .

[15]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Yield gap analysis of feed-crop livestock systems: The case of grass-based beef production in France , 2018 .

[16]  Gerry C. Emmans,et al.  Effective energy: a concept of energy utilization applied across species , 1994, British Journal of Nutrition.

[17]  I. D. Boer,et al.  A framework for quantitative analysis of livestock systems using theoretical concepts of production ecology , 2015 .

[18]  J. Wolf,et al.  Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review , 2013 .

[19]  F. Teuscher,et al.  Beef versus dairy cattle: a comparison of feed conversion, carcass composition, and meat quality , 2007 .

[20]  L. Istasse,et al.  Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth. , 2000, Domestic animal endocrinology.

[21]  C. Aguilar,et al.  Nutritional evaluation of diets. Simulation model of digestion and passage of nutrients through the rumen-reticulum , 1997 .

[22]  John Turnpenny,et al.  Thermal balance of livestock. 1. A parsimonious model , 2000 .

[23]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  DairyMod and EcoMod: biophysical pasture-simulation models for Australia and New Zealand , 2008 .

[24]  J. Taylor,et al.  Manipulating metabolic parameters to improve growth rate and milk secretion. , 1980, Journal of animal science.

[25]  J. P. Dulphy,et al.  The INRA “Fill Unit” System for Predicting the Voluntary Intake of Forage-Based Diets in Ruminants: A Review , 1986 .

[26]  Jean-Yves Dourmad,et al.  InraPorc: A model and decision support tool for the nutrition of growing pigs , 2008 .

[27]  R. Rabbinge,et al.  Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations , 1997 .