The Relationship between Self-Perception of a Learning Disability and Achievement, Self-Concept and Social Support

This study investigated the relationship between self-perception of a learning disability (SPLD) and self-concept and social support. Fifty-six third-through sixth-grade children with learning disabilities were administered Heyman's SPLD scale. This instrument measures the degree to which children view their disability as circumscribed, modifiable and nonstigmatizing rather than global, unchangeable and stigmatizing. Students were also administered two scales developed by Harter to measure general and domain-specific self-concept and social support. Results revealed that children with less negative perceptions of their learning disability had higher math achievement scores. Also, they perceived more positive global self-concept, more intellectual and behavorial competence, and more social acceptance. These children also felt more support from their parents and classmates. The relationship of SPLD to self-concept and social support was maintained after partialing out the influences of actual academic achievement. The importance of helping students more clearly understand the nature of their learning disability is discussed.

[1]  R. Ayres,et al.  Self-Concept and Success-Failure Attributions of Nonhandicapped Students and Students with Learning Disabilities , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Beth E. Yauman.  Special Education Placement and the Self-Concepts of Elementary-School age Children , 1980 .

[3]  R. Pearl,et al.  Mothers' Evaluations of Their Learning-Disabled Children , 1982 .

[4]  S. Schulman.  Psychotherapeutic issues for the learning disabled adult. , 1984 .

[5]  B. A. Wright,et al.  Adjustment to misfortune; a problem of social-psychological rehabilitation. , 1956, Artificial limbs.

[6]  J. Coleman.  Self-Concept and the Mildly Handicapped: the Role of Social Comparisons , 1983 .

[7]  Paul D. Hinkle.  California Special Education Programs: A Composite of Laws. Education Code-Part 30 and Other Related Laws. Revised to Cover Laws Enacted during 1984. , 1985 .

[8]  N. Geschwind.  Why Orton was right , 1982 .

[9]  Beatrice A. Wright,et al.  Physical disability - a psychosocial approach, 2nd ed. , 1983 .

[10]  Frank R. Robbins,et al.  Perceived Competence and Self-Worth of LD and Normally Achieving Students , 1987 .

[11]  D. Kronick.  The Pros and Cons of Labeling , 1977 .

[12]  B. Priel,et al.  Self-Perceptions of First- and Second-Grade Children with Learning Disabilities , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  G. Bear,et al.  Self-Perceptions Of Nonhandicapped Children And Children With Learning Disabilities In Integrated Classes , 1991 .

[14]  E. Forman.  The Effects of Social Support and School Placement on the Self—Concept of LD Students , 1988 .

[15]  Wendy B. Heyman.  The Self-Perception of a Learning Disability and Its Relationship to Academic Self-Concept and Self-Esteem , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[16]  P. Gerber,et al.  Identifying Alterable Patterns in Employment Success for Highly Successful Adults with Learning Disabilities , 1992, Journal of learning disabilities.

[17]  B. Licht.  Cognitive—Motivational Factors That Contribute to the Achievement of Learning-Disabled Children , 1983, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  J. Chapman.  Learning Disabled Children’s Self-Concepts , 1988 .

[19]  Gerald A. Strag.  Comparative Behavioral Ratings of Parents with Severe Mentally Retarded, Special Learning Disability, and Normal Children , 1972 .

[20]  N. Zigmond,et al.  Self-Concept in Learning Disabled Adolescents , 1983, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  M. Cosden,et al.  Self-Concept in Children with Learning Disabilities: The Relationship between Global Self-Concept, Academic “Discounting,” Nonacademic Self-Concept, and Perceived Social Support , 1994 .

[22]  Bernice A. Stone.  Ecological View of Self-Concept , 1984 .

[23]  B. Rourke.  Socioemotional disturbances of learning disabled children. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.