The present study compared differences in subjective and objective performance in completely-in-the-canal (CIC) hearing aids with conventional uniform 1.5 mm parallel vents and another with a reverse horn vent where the diameter increased from 1.5 mm on the lateral faceplate to 3 mm on the medial opening of the hearing aid. Nine hearing-impaired persons with a high-frequency hearing loss participated. The test battery included unaided in situ thresholds, amount of available gain before feedback, speech in quiet, speech in noise (HINT), subjective ratings of hollowness and tolerance, objective measures of the occlusion effect, and real-ear aided response. Results showed less available gain before feedback but less occlusion effect for subjective ratings and objective measures with the reverse horn vent. This type of vent design may be useful to increase the effective vent diameter of custom (including CIC) hearing aids.
[1]
F K Kuk.
Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs.
,
1994,
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[2]
Ampclusion Management 101 : Understanding Variables A tutorial on occlusion , its causes , and how to reduce / eliminate its effects
,
.
[3]
S. Soli,et al.
Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.
,
1994,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4]
Roger Lovegrove,et al.
Measuring the Outcomes of a National Rehabilitation Program: Normative Data for the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and the Hearing Aid User’s Questionnaire (HAUQ)
,
1999
.
[5]
T. Ricketts.
Directional Hearing Aids
,
2001,
Trends in amplification.