Pronominal and anaphoric reference in agrammatism

Abstract Subjects with Broca's aphasia have been shown to display difficulties in on-line and off-line tasks involving personal pronouns and reflexives. Off-line tasks have indicated more errors with pronouns than with reflexives while the reverse has been found in on-line studies. In the present off-line study, the comprehension of sentences containing personal pronouns and reflexives is examined in a group of 10 agrammatic participants. Results indicate that subjects had difficulties with both pronouns and reflexives, particularly with reflexives in sentences that contained a quantificational antecedent, as well as with pronouns in exceptional case marking constructions. It is argued that the low performance that subjects exhibited as a group in pronouns and reflexives indicates two distinct impairments, one that concerns coreference and one that concerns A-dependencies, the latter being a manifestation of a general processing failure to link positions. Poor performance on exceptional case marking constructions compared to simple transitive sentences is claimed to be interpreted within theories for reference assignment that distinguish between the two sentence types.

[1]  Susan Edwards,et al.  Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia , 2004, Brain and Language.

[2]  Chien Yu-Chin,et al.  Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics , 1990 .

[3]  G. Waters,et al.  Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in sentence-picture matching tasks. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[5]  Sergey Avrutin,et al.  Reference assignment: Using language breakdown to choose between theoretical approaches , 2006, Brain and Language.

[6]  C. Salis,et al.  Discourse linking, canonicity, and comprehension of wh-questions in agrammatism , 2005, Brain and Language.

[7]  Jane Grimsahw.  Knwoledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory , 1990 .

[8]  K. Wexler,et al.  The Breakdown of Binding Relations , 1993, Brain and Language.

[9]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program , 2002 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[11]  David Swinney,et al.  The Time-Course of Lexical Access and the Role of Context: Converging Evidence from Normal and Aphasic Processing , 2000 .

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[13]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge and Obedience: The Developmental Status of the Binding Theory , 1990 .

[14]  K. Wexler,et al.  Development of Principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and Coreference , 1992 .

[15]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  Center and Periphery in the Grammar of Anaphora , 1986 .

[16]  Y. Grodzinsky.  The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  G. Hickok,et al.  Representation, Referentiality, and Processing in Agrammatic Comprehension : Two Case Studies , 1995, Brain and Language.

[18]  N. Geschwind.  Language and the brain. , 1972, Scientific American.

[19]  Christos Salis,et al.  Comprehension of wh-questions and declarative sentences in agrammatic aphasia: The set partition hypothesis , 2008, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[20]  Lawrence M. Solan,et al.  The Acquisition of Structural Restrictions on Anaphora , 1981 .

[21]  H. V. D. Lely,et al.  Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children , 1997, Cognition.

[22]  S. Edwards,et al.  The Verb and Sentence test , 2002 .

[23]  K. Ballard,et al.  Agrammatic Aphasic Subjects' Comprehension of Subject and Object ExtractedWhQuestions , 1999, Brain and Language.

[24]  Richard S. Kayne.  Pronouns and Their Antecedents , 2008 .

[25]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Step by step : essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik , 2000 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[27]  J. Nicol,et al.  Overarching Agrammatism: When Comprehension Involves Production , 2000 .

[28]  Prahlad Gupta,et al.  EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORD PROCESSING AND VERBAL SHORT-TERM MEMORY: EVIDENCE FROM ASSOCIATIONS AND DISSOCIATIONS , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[29]  M. Just,et al.  A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: making normal adults perform like aphasic patients , 1994 .

[30]  N. Hornstein.  Move! : a minimalist theory of construal , 2000 .

[31]  Caroline Heycock,et al.  Proceedings of the Gala '97 Conference on Language Acquisition , 1998 .

[32]  E. Reuland.  Primitives of Binding , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[33]  Rita Sloan Berndt,et al.  Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis , 1996, Cognition.

[34]  B. Lust.  Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora , 1986 .

[35]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora questions , 1983 .

[36]  T. Reinhart,et al.  The innateness of binding and coreference , 1993 .

[37]  Y. Grodzinsky.  A Restrictive Theory of Agrammatic Comprehension , 1995, Brain and Language.