IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Part 1: Numerical Analysis of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Bridge Deck Section Based on Analytical Aerodynamics

IABSE Task Group 3.1 has the mandate to define reference results for the validation of methodologies and programs used to study both stability and buffeting responses of long-span bridges. These to...

[1]  Ragnar Sigbjörnsson,et al.  An alternative analytical approach to prediction of flutter stability limits of cable supported bridges , 2011 .

[2]  Masaru Matsumoto,et al.  The Complex Branch Characteristics of Coupled Flutter , 2006 .

[3]  H. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of Impulse Response Functions for Convolution Integrals of Aerodynamic Forces by Optimization with a Penalty Function , 2012 .

[4]  Haifan Xiang,et al.  Simulation of stationary Gaussian stochastic wind velocity field , 2006 .

[5]  Ragnar Sigbjörnsson,et al.  Simplified prediction of wind-induced response and stability limit of slender long-span suspension bridges, based on modified quasi-steady theory: A case study , 2010 .

[6]  Ragnar Sigbjörnsson,et al.  Finite element formulation of the self-excited forces for time-domain assessment of wind-induced dynamic response and flutter stability limit of cable-supported bridges , 2012 .

[7]  Luca Caracoglia,et al.  Predicting the flutter speed of a pedestrian suspension bridge through examination of laboratory experimental errors , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[8]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration within IEA Wind Task 23:Phase IV Results Regarding Floating Wind Turbine Modeling: 2010 European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC) 20-23 April 2010, Warsaw, Poland, April 2010 , 2010 .

[9]  Ragnar Sigbjörnsson,et al.  Time domain modeling of self-excited aerodynamic forces for cable-supported bridges: A comparative study , 2011 .

[10]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections, Part 1: Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data , 2009 .

[11]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  COUPLED FLUTTER AND BUFFETING ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN BRIDGES , 1996 .

[12]  Kilje Jung,et al.  Exact Enforcement of the Causality Condition on the Aerodynamic Impulse Response Function Using a Truncated Fourier Series , 2014 .

[13]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections, Part 2: Implications on the aerodynamic stability of long-span bridges , 2009 .

[14]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Monte Carlo solution of structural dynamics , 1972 .

[15]  Stoyan Stoyanoff,et al.  A unified approach for 3D stability and time domain response analysis with application of quasi-steady theory , 2001 .

[16]  Ho-Kyung Kim,et al.  New Unified Approach for Aeroelastic Analyses Using Approximate Transfer Functions of Aerodynamic Forces , 2014 .

[17]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Monte Carlo analysis of total damping and flutter speed of a long span bridge: Effects of structural and aerodynamic uncertainties , 2014 .

[18]  M. Shinozuka,et al.  Digital simulation of random processes and its applications , 1972 .

[19]  Teng Wu,et al.  IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Part 2: Numerical Analysis of a Three-Degree-of-Freedom Bridge Deck Section Based on Experimental Aerodynamics , 2020, Structural Engineering International.

[20]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration (OC3) for IEA Wind Task 23 Offshore Wind Technology and Deployment , 2010 .

[21]  G. Deodatis.  Simulation of Ergodic Multivariate Stochastic Processes , 1996 .

[22]  Luca Caracoglia,et al.  Statistical buffeting response of flexible bridges influenced by errors in aeroelastic loading estimation , 2012 .

[23]  Luca Caracoglia,et al.  Estimation of torsional-flutter probability in flexible bridges considering randomness in flutter derivatives , 2011 .

[24]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Aerodynamic Models for Buffeting and Flutter of Long-Span Bridges , 2017 .

[25]  A. Kareem,et al.  TIME DOMAIN FLUTTER AND BUFFETING RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES , 1999 .

[26]  T. Argentini,et al.  An experimental validation of a band superposition model of the aerodynamic forces acting on multi-box deck sections , 2013 .

[27]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Forced motion and free motion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the Messina suspension bridge , 2004 .

[28]  Luca Caracoglia,et al.  An Euler-Monte Carlo algorithm assessing Moment Lyapunov Exponents for stochastic bridge flutter predictions , 2013 .