Integrating clumping effects in forest canopy structure: an assessment through hemispherical photographs

Methods for analysing foliage nonrandomness in forest canopies by means of hemispherical photographs are assessed. These methods involve calculation of the canopy element clumping factor, at scales coarser than that of the shoot, to adjust for clumping effects on leaf area index (LAI) estimates derived from gap fraction measurements. Two approaches are presented. The first is based on a gap size accumulation method (the Chen and Cihlar clumping index), whereas the second relies on a gap size distribution method (the Pielou coefficient of segregation). Both methods take advantage of hemispherical photographs, allowing measurement of gap size and gap fraction from sequences of black (foliage) and white (sky) pixels along circular transects over the whole range of angles. Clumping factors generated by hemispherical photographs have been analysed and compared using (i) hemispherical photographs of simulated forest stands with fixed LAI (2, 4, and 6) and three-dimensional spatial distribution of foliage, ranging from complete randomness to full clumping; and (ii) in situ hemispherical photographs from forest canopies with known architecture. The following conclusions are drawn based on our experimental data set: (i) overall clumping factors can be obtained by integrating values over the same range of angles as that used to derive LAI, therefore ensuring consistency between estimations of LAI and clumping factors; (ii) the Chen and Cihlar clumping index tends to underestimate clumping in highly clumped canopies, whereas the Pielou coefficient of segregation tends to overestimate clumping in poorly clumped canopies; and (iii) hemispherical photographs provide an efficient tool for describing the degree of canopy nonrandomness in all directions of the hemisphere and to adjust clumping effects on LAI estimates derived from gap fraction analysis. However, clumping factors derived from hemispherical photographs need to be further tested in real canopies and compared with other methods to define their merits and limitations.

[1]  Linking ecophysiology and forest productivity: An overview of the ECOLEAP project , 1999 .

[2]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Photographic exposure affects indirect estimation of leaf area in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. , 2000 .

[3]  Jb Miller,et al.  A formula for average foliage density , 1967 .

[4]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[5]  G. Russell,et al.  Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography , 1999 .

[6]  J. M. Chen,et al.  Effects of clumping on estimates of stand leaf area index using the LI-COR LAI-2000 , 1993 .

[7]  Hugh J. Barclay,et al.  Conversion of total leaf area to projected leaf area in lodgepole pine and Douglas-fir. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[8]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  Recent advancements in optical field leaf area index, foliage heterogeneity, and foliage angular distribution measurements , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[9]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function: The description and measurement of plant canopy structure , 1989 .

[10]  A.R.G. Lang,et al.  Measuring leaf area index in a sparse eucalypt forest: a comparison of estimates from direct measurement, hemispherical photography, sunlight transmittance and allometric regression , 1995 .

[11]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements , 1997 .

[12]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  Modelling light obstruction in three conifer forests using hemispherical photography and fine tree architecture , 1996 .

[13]  A. Lang.  Estimation of leaf area index from transmission of direct sunlight in discontinuous canopies , 1986 .

[14]  P. Rich.  Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. , 1990 .

[15]  A. Lang.  Simplified estimate of leaf area index from transmittance of the sun's beam , 1987 .

[16]  John M. Norman,et al.  Characterization of radiation regimes in nonrandom forest canopies: theory, measurements, and a simplified modeling approach. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[17]  J. Cihlar,et al.  Plant canopy gap-size analysis theory for improving optical measurements of leaf-area index. , 1995, Applied optics.

[18]  S. T. Gower,et al.  A comparison of optical and direct methods for estimating foliage surface area index in forests , 1994 .

[19]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the effect of canopy architecture on optical measurements of leaf area index using two gap size analysis methods , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  E. C. Pielou.  Runs of One Species with Respect to Another in Transects through Plant Populations , 1962 .

[21]  Comparaison de méthodes optiques pour estimer l’ouverture de la canopée et l’indice foliaire en forêt feuillue , 2001 .

[22]  A. Kuusk,et al.  Angular distribution of radiation beneath forest canopies using a CCD-radiometer , 2002 .

[23]  P. Stenberg,et al.  Performance of the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer in estimating leaf area index of some Scots pine stands. , 1994, Tree physiology.

[24]  William E. Winner,et al.  Leaf area index of an old-growth Douglas-fir forest estimated from direct structural measurements in the canopy , 2000 .

[25]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Characterizing canopy nonrandomness with a multiband vegetation imager (MVI) , 1997 .

[26]  Hugh J. Barclay,et al.  Assessing bias from boles in calculating leaf area index in immature Douglas-fir with the LI-COR canopy analyzer. , 2000 .

[27]  L. Olsson,et al.  Evaluation of forest-canopy photographs with diode-array scanner OSIRIS , 1982 .

[28]  Margaret C. Anderson.  The geometry of leaf distribution in some South-eastern Australian forests , 1981 .

[29]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  Indirect Measurement of Forest Canopy Structure from In Situ Optical Sensors , 2003 .

[30]  J. Pontailler,et al.  Validity of leaf areas and angles estimated in a beech forest from analysis of gap frequencies, using hemispherical photographs and a plant canopy analyzer , 1999 .

[31]  J. Welles,et al.  Canopy structure measurement by gap fraction analysis using commercial instrumentation , 1996 .

[32]  T. Nilson.  A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands , 1971 .

[33]  J. M. Norman,et al.  A Sunfleck Theory for Plant Canopies I. Lengths of Sunlit Segments along a Transect1 , 1971 .

[34]  H. Bartelink.  Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). , 1997 .

[35]  Francisco de Castro,et al.  The effect of leaf clustering in the interception of light in vegetal canopies: theoretical considerations , 1999 .

[36]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[37]  J. Norman,et al.  A Sunfleck Theory for Plant Canopies II. Penumbra Effect: Intensity Distributions along Sunfleck Segments1 , 1971 .

[38]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  Hierarchical characterization of canopy architecture for boreal forest , 1997 .

[39]  Sven Wagner,et al.  Relative radiance measurements and zenith angle dependent segmentation in hemispherical photography , 2001 .

[40]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  Inversion of gap frequency data in forest stands , 1999 .

[41]  J. Norman,et al.  Crop structure and the penetration of direct sunlight , 1985 .

[42]  J. Chen.  Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands , 1996 .

[43]  A.R.G. Lang,et al.  Application of some of Cauchy's theorems to estimation of surface areas of leaves, needles and branches of plants, and light transmittance , 1991 .

[44]  K. Soudani,et al.  On the variability of the LAI of homogeneous covers with respect to the surface size and application , 2003 .

[45]  E. Dufrene,et al.  Estimation of deciduous forest leaf area index using direct and indirect methods , 1995, Oecologia.