Minimizing communication risk in construction: a Delphi study of the key role of project managers

All significant construction projects involve the project owner and the contractor, as well as their project managers. Following upon recent research into the multiple principal-agent problem, which was applied to the minimization of communication risk in construction projects, the focus here is on communication issues between the four project parties. Recent research has shown that the relationship between the project owner and the contractor is paramount for risk minimization before the contract between them is signed. However, the relationship between project managers is dominant for risk minimization after the contract is signed. To further explore risk minimization at this stage of the project, the Delphi method was employed. A panel of highly-experienced project managers working for both project owners and contractors was asked several rounds of questions in an attempt to arrive to a consensus concerning the most important relationships between project parties in terms of risk minimization after the contract is signed. The relationship between the two project managers tops the ranking, thus focusing further research. As they are both agents, and as there is no contract between them, this offers a fresh challenge for the principal-agent theory.

[1]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects , 2001 .

[2]  Anita Cerić,et al.  The Principal-Agent Theory and the Role of Project Managers in Construction: Guidelines for Future Research , 2013 .

[3]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Contractor selection for small building works in Hong Kong , 2002 .

[4]  Martin Schieg,et al.  Strategies for Avoiding Asymmetric Information in Construction Project Management , 2008 .

[5]  Roy C. Schmidt,et al.  MANAGING DELPHI SURVEYS USING NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[6]  Graham Winch,et al.  Managing Construction Projects , 2009 .

[7]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  Chen-yu Chang,et al.  The hold-up problem in the management of construction projects: A case study of the Channel Tunnel , 2007 .

[9]  Gary David Holt,et al.  A review of contractor selection practice in the U.K. construction industry , 1995 .

[10]  Nikos Macheridis,et al.  The moral responsibility of project selectors , 2010 .

[11]  S B Sharkey,et al.  An approach to consensus building using the Delphi technique: developing a learning resource in mental health. , 2001, Nurse education today.

[12]  Hyun-Soo Lee,et al.  Construction knowledge evaluation using expert index , 2010 .

[13]  Sung-Lin Hsueh,et al.  Customer behavior and decision making in the refurbishment industry‐a data mining approach , 2010 .

[14]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  Anita Cerić,et al.  A framework for process-driven risk management in construction projects , 2003 .

[16]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Complexity, Flexibility, and the Make-or-Buy Decision , 2002 .

[17]  S S Stevens,et al.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. , 1946, Science.

[18]  R. Müller,et al.  Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent , 2004 .

[19]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[20]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[21]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Risk assessment of construction projects , 2010 .

[22]  Yehiel Rosenfeld,et al.  Cost-plus and incentive contracting: Some false benefits and inherent drawbacks , 1991 .

[23]  C Hsu,et al.  THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE: MAKING SENSE OF CONSENSUS PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT , 2007 .

[24]  Chen-yu Chang,et al.  The principle of inconsistent trinity in the selection of procurement systems , 2007 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[26]  Michael C. Jensen,et al.  A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms , 2001 .

[27]  R. Müller,et al.  The impact of principal–agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager , 2005 .

[28]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders , 1989 .

[29]  W. K. Brauers,et al.  Group decision making with multi-objective optimization , 2008 .

[30]  C A Lindeman,et al.  DELPHI SURVEY OF PRIORITIES IN CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH , 1975, Nursing research.

[31]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[32]  Muhammad Imran Yousuf,et al.  Using Experts` Opinions Through Delphi Technique , 2007 .

[33]  Bjørn Johs. Kolltveit,et al.  The importance of the early phase: the case of construction and building projects , 2004 .

[34]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Contractor selection for construction works by applying saw‐g and topsis grey techniques , 2010 .

[35]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Modeling Interfirm Dependency: Game Theoretic Simulation to Examine the Holdup Problem in Project Networks , 2011 .

[36]  Willem K. Brauers,et al.  Project Management for a Country with Multiple Objectives , 2012 .

[37]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[38]  T. R. Knapp.  Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy. , 1990, Nursing research.