Assessment of Barriers in Green Supply Chain Management Using ISM: A Case Study of the Automobile Industry in India

Production organizations often upgrade their supply chain processes to green supply chain system for various operational synergies, but they certainly fail to implement such advanced systems because of barriers that are accountable for internal and external environments. Considering this, the study analyzes the automobile industry in India, both to explore the barriers of green supply chain and to classify them. To do so, a legitimate method of mathematical modelling—interpretive structural modelling— is used. The study has identified thirteen barriers based on the extensive literature, and has added one, with reference to expert opinion. It has been found that six attributes are dependent barriers, five are driver barriers and three are linkage barriers. The study holds significant implications at the firm level, for production processes and the green supply chain system, especially in automobile manufacturing firms. The identified relationship between these barriers may help organizations overcome them in order to implement an effective and efficient green supply chain management (GSCM) system.

[1]  F. Chan,et al.  Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach , 2007 .

[2]  Joseph Sarkis Manufacturing’s role in corporate environmental sustainability ‐ Concerns for the new millennium , 2001 .

[3]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) of IT-enablers for Indian manufacturing SMEs , 2008, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[4]  Ali Diabat,et al.  Analysis of interaction between the barriers for the implementation of sustainable supply chain management , 2013 .

[5]  Tapan Sahoo,et al.  Developing a Conceptual Framework for Strategic Technology Management Using ISM and MICMAC Methodology , 2011 .

[6]  R. Lamming,et al.  THE ROLE OF SUPPLY MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES IN GREEN SUPPLY , 2001 .

[7]  Larry C. Giunipero,et al.  Purchasing and supply management sustainability: Drivers and barriers , 2012 .

[8]  R. Shankar,et al.  Modelling the barriers of green supply chain practices: an Indian perspective , 2010 .

[9]  Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model , 2012, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[10]  D. Russell,et al.  People and information technology in the supply chain: Social and organizational influences on adoption , 2004 .

[11]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process , 2014 .

[12]  Tao Zhao,et al.  Analysis of interactions among the barriers to energy saving in China , 2008 .

[13]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry , 2002 .

[14]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  AN INTER- SECTORAL COMPARISON OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IN CHINA: DRIVERS AND PRACTICES , 2006 .

[15]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective , 2011 .

[16]  Alba Bala,et al.  Experiences with greening suppliers. The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , 2008 .

[17]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration , 2007 .

[18]  M. Faisal Analysing the barriers to corporate social responsibility in supply chains: an interpretive structural modelling approach , 2010 .

[19]  M. Perona,et al.  A new framework for supply chain management , 2013 .

[20]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  INTEGRATED CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND ILLUSTRATIVE CASES , 2004 .

[21]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[22]  P. Hong,et al.  Supply chain partnerships and supply chain integration: the mediating role of information quality and sharing , 2008 .

[23]  Frank A. Felder,et al.  Analysis of barriers to development in landfill communities using interpretive structural modeling , 2011 .

[24]  Hokey Min,et al.  Supply chain modeling: past, present and future , 2002 .

[25]  R. Singh Analyzing the Factors for VMI Implementation: A Framework , 2013 .

[26]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Research opportunities in purchasing and supply management , 2012 .

[27]  Ronald S. Tibben-Lembke,et al.  Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices , 1999 .

[28]  Z. Zabinsky,et al.  Reverse logistics network design: a conceptual framework for decision making , 2008 .

[29]  H. Walker,et al.  Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors , 2008 .

[30]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  A hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS approach to assess improvement areas when implementing green supply chain initiatives , 2013 .

[31]  Henry Mintzberg The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[32]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[33]  Adrien Presley,et al.  The theory and practice of Reverse Logistics , 2007 .

[34]  Samir K. Srivastava,et al.  Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review , 2007 .

[35]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider , 2009 .

[36]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[37]  K. Govindan,et al.  Barriers to green supply chain management in Indian mining industries: a graph theoretic approach , 2013 .

[38]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  Development of key performance measures for the automobile green supply chain , 2011 .

[39]  G. Svensson A conceptual framework of vulnerability in firms’ inbound and outbound logistics flows , 2002 .

[40]  R. Shankar,et al.  ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIONS AMONG THE BARRIERS OF REVERSE LOGISTICS , 2005 .

[41]  Ru-Jen Lin Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices , 2013 .

[42]  Su‐Yol Lee Drivers for the participation of small and medium‐sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives , 2008 .

[43]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Modelling the barriers of Supply Chain Performance Measurement System implementation in the Indian automobile supply chain , 2009 .

[44]  Sanjay Sharma Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[45]  Vinay Sharma,et al.  e-Applications in Indian Agri-Food Supply Chain: Relationship among Enablers , 2013 .

[46]  Shun Cai,et al.  Exploring the antecedents of logistics social responsibility: A focus on Chinese firms , 2012 .

[47]  Festus Olorunniwo,et al.  An exploration of reverse logistics practices in three companies , 2008 .

[48]  Yong Geng,et al.  An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management , 2013 .

[49]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of green supply chain management practices in Brazil: empirical evidence , 2013 .

[50]  Stephen Evans,et al.  Buyer-supplier partnerships during product design and development in the global automotive sector: Who invests, in what and when? , 2010 .

[51]  M. Eugster,et al.  The recycling and disposal of electrical and electronic waste in China—legislative and market responses , 2005 .

[52]  P. Rao,et al.  Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance , 2005 .

[53]  Guo-Ciang Wu,et al.  The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry , 2012 .

[54]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Barrier analysis for product service system using interpretive structural model , 2010 .