Patient preferences for elagolix and leuprolide for treating endometriosis-related pain in the United States

ABSTRACT Introduction We evaluated elagolix and leuprolide from the patient’s perspective for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain. Area covered Preference weights from a published discrete choice experiment were used to evaluate preferences for treatment profiles simulating elagolix (150 mg/day and 200 mg/twice-daily dosages) and leuprolide for the treatment of moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the range of risk for pregnancy-related problems, moderate to severe hot flashes, and bone fracture across scenarios. Expert opinion The 200 mg twice daily dosage of elagolix is more likely to be preferred over leuprolide by patients with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain in all scenarios explored in the evaluation and sensitivity analyses. The probability that an average respondent would select a treatment was sensitive to increases in risk of moderate to severe hot flashes for leuprolide and possible variations in the risk of pregnancy-related problems for both treatments but was not influenced by an increased risk of bone fracture. Conclusions Patients’ preferences for treatment of endometriosis-related pain should be evaluated using the benefits and risks of each pharmacological option. Respondents were more likely to prefer the treatment profile similar to 200 mg twice daily elagolix over that of leuprolide in all scenarios.

[1]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Rethinking endometriosis care: applying the chronic care model via a multidisciplinary program for the care of women with endometriosis , 2019, International journal of women's health.

[2]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Patient Preferences for Endometriosis Pain Treatments in the United States. , 2019, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[3]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of elagolix versus leuprolide acetate for treating moderate-to-severe endometriosis pain in the USA. , 2019, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[4]  N. Watts,et al.  Elagolix Alone or With Add-Back Therapy in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2018, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Yvette N. Lamb Elagolix: First Global Approval , 2018, Drugs.

[6]  S. Ferrero,et al.  Current and Emerging Therapeutics for the Management of Endometriosis , 2018, Drugs.

[7]  S. Eichner,et al.  Baseline Burden of Endometriosis-Associated Pain among Women in Two Phase 3 Elagolix Studies [10Q] , 2018 .

[8]  V. Chiantera,et al.  How to Understand the Complexity of Endometriosis-Related Pain , 2017 .

[9]  A. Soliman,et al.  Prevalence and Symptomatic Burden of Diagnosed Endometriosis in the United States: National Estimates from a Cross-Sectional Survey of 59,411 Women , 2016, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[10]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. , 2016, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[11]  N. Ács,et al.  Treatment of Endometriosis‐Associated Pain with Elagolix, an Oral GnRH Antagonist , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  K. Zondervan,et al.  Peripheral changes in endometriosis-associated pain. , 2014, Human reproduction update.

[13]  Andrew Lloyd,et al.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[14]  K. Eyster,et al.  Management of Endometriosis-associated Pain , 2010, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  K. Zondervan,et al.  Differences in characteristics among 1,000 women with endometriosis based on extent of disease. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  P. Crosignani,et al.  Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. , 2006, Human reproduction.

[17]  P. Crosignani,et al.  Advances in the management of endometriosis: an update for clinicians. , 2006, Human reproduction update.

[18]  S. Carson,et al.  Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Depot leuprolide acetate versus danazol in the treatment of women with symptomatic endometriosis: a multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial. II. Assessment of safety. The Lupron Endometriosis Study Group. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Depot leuprolide versus danazol in treatment of women with symptomatic endometriosis. I. Efficacy results. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  Telba Irony,et al.  Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.