SciEthics Interactive: science and ethics learning in a virtual environment

Learning in immersive 3D environments allows students to collaborate, build, and interact with difficult course concepts. This case study examines the design and development of the TransGen Island within the SciEthics Interactive project, a National Science Foundation-funded, 3D virtual world emphasizing learning science content in the context of ethical dilemmas. The 2 year development process is examined through the lens of the rapid prototyping instructional design model, following the project from conceptualization to implementation of a 3D simulation. Through expert interviews, focus groups, and working groups, we were able to determine critical scientific and ethical issues to present to learners in the virtual world. We collected data on 53 students using the simulation at universities in the United States and South Africa and evaluated their experience using qualitative and quantitative methods. Results showed that student participants were engaged and motivated by the simulation. The students reported an increase in science knowledge and ethical understanding, but individual experiences varied.

[1]  James G. Speight,et al.  Ethics in Science and Engineering: Speight/Ethics , 2011 .

[2]  S. Thoma,et al.  Learning Ethics through Virtual Fieldtrips: Teaching Ethical Theories through Virtual Experiences , 2011 .

[3]  Victoria McArthur,et al.  Real ethics in a virtual world , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  William Douglas Woody.  Learning from the codes of the academic disciplines , 2008 .

[5]  Donald L. Mccabe,et al.  It Takes a Village: Academic Dishonesty & Educational Opportunity. , 2005 .

[6]  James G. Speight,et al.  Ethics in Science and Engineering , 2011 .

[7]  Jean-Claude Bradley,et al.  Chemistry in Second Life , 2009, Chemistry Central journal.

[8]  Katherine Wimpenny,et al.  Unpacking frames of reference to inform the design of virtual world learning in higher education , 2012 .

[9]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  M. Davison,et al.  Describing and testing a moderator of the moral judgment and action relationship. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Ann Nichols-Casebolt.  Research Integrity and Responsible Conduct of Research , 2012 .

[12]  Sandra L. Titus,et al.  Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closed ORI Cases , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[13]  Mariano Alcañiz Raya,et al.  Learning in serious virtual worlds: Evaluation of learning effectiveness and appeal to students in the E-Junior project , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[14]  K. Wilson,et al.  A Survey of Health-Related Activities on Second Life , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness , 2008, Ethics & behavior.

[16]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Erratum to: Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play , 2010 .

[17]  Gerald S. Edmonds,et al.  A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models , 1994 .

[18]  Steven D. Tripp,et al.  Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy , 1990 .

[19]  Xavier Bosch,et al.  Tie funding to research integrity , 2010, Nature.

[20]  Toni Stokes Jones,et al.  Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study , 2000 .

[21]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Rapid prototyping in automated instructional design , 1992 .

[22]  Sandra L. Titus,et al.  Repairing research integrity , 2008, Nature.

[23]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Designing Assessments and Assessing Designs in Virtual Educational Environments , 2009 .

[24]  Shalin Hai-Jew.  Virtual Immersive and 3D Learning Spaces: Emerging Technologies and Trends , 2010 .

[25]  Brian Rappert,et al.  Education and Ethics in the Life Sciences: Strengthening the Prohibition of Biological Weapons , 2010 .

[26]  James Desrosier,et al.  Rapid Prototyping Reconsidered , 2011 .

[27]  Tshepo Batane,et al.  Rapid Prototyping for Designing and Delivering Technology-Based Lessons. , 2010 .

[28]  Steven Warburton,et al.  Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  Nicholas H. Steneck,et al.  Global Research Integrity Training , 2013, Science.

[30]  George M. Piskurich.  Rapid Instructional Design: Learning ID Fast and Right (Essential Knowledge Resource (Paperback)) , 2000 .

[31]  Nicholas H. Steneck,et al.  Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment , 2011 .

[32]  James R. Rest.  Development in Judging Moral Issues , 1979 .

[33]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A New Approach to Assessing Ethical Conduct in Scientific Work , 2003, Accountability in research.

[34]  N. Alperstein.  CAN YOU DEVELOP VIRTUE IN A VIRTUAL WORLD? TEACHING ADVERTISING ETHICS IN SECOND LIFE , 2011 .

[35]  D. Tice,et al.  Self-concept change and self-presentation: the looking glass self is also a magnifying glass. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  R. Dehaan,et al.  The Impending Revolution in Undergraduate Science Education , 2005 .

[37]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Moral Maturation and Moral Conation: A Capacity Approach to Explaining Moral Thought and Action , 2011 .