StenosisEvaluation of Patients with Carotid Artery Ultrasonography and B-Flow Imaging for Combined Use of Color Duplex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Color duplex ultrasonography (CDU) is a standard method of noninvasive evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS). B-flow imaging (BFI), on the other hand, is a newer method. We investigated the accuracy of the two noninvasive tests—CDU and BFI—each separately and as a combination of the two tests by comparing with digital subtraction angiography as a reference standard. METHODS: We performed CDU, BFI, and digital subtraction angiography on 95 consecutive patients with ICAS. Separate and combined test results of CDU and BFI were compared with digital subtraction angiography results. RESULTS: For identifying 70% to 99% ICAS, as CDU criterion, the ratio of internal carotid artery to common carotid artery peak systolic velocity had the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 96%). The sensitivity and specificity of BFI were 65% and 98%, respectively. With CDU and BFI, results were concordant in 144 (89%) cases for 70% to 99% ICAS. Sensitivity and specificity of combined CDU and BFI results for identification of ICAS were 95% and 99%, respectively. The misclassification rates of CDU and BFI were 4.7% and 8.1%, respectively. When combined test results were concordant, the misclassification rate decreased to 1.4%. CONCLUSION: CDU showed a slightly better accuracy than did BFI in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Combined use of CDU and BFI is more accurate than use of either test alone. The results of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, the European Carotid Surgery Trial, and the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study trials have shown the importance of detecting and grading symptomatic and asymptomatic internal carotid artery

[1]  Markus Horn,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  R. Ahmadi,et al.  B-flow evaluation of carotid arterial stenosis: initial experience. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  Erik Buskens,et al.  Preoperative Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Noninvasive Testing , 2002, Stroke.

[4]  Christopher K. Zarins,et al.  Duplex Ultrasound Criteria for Defining the Severity of Carotid Stenosis , 2002, Annals of vascular surgery.

[5]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  A. Umemura,et al.  B-Mode Flow Imaging of the Carotid Artery , 2001, Stroke.

[7]  H. Dinkel,et al.  Value of the CT angiography in the diagnosis of common carotid artery bifurcation disease: CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography and color flow Doppler. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[8]  S. Debus,et al.  Colour flow Doppler ultrasound of the carotid bifurcation: can it replace routine angiography before carotid endarterectomy? , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  M. Skalej,et al.  Ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced MRA in ICA-stenosis: is conventional angiography obsolete? , 2001, Journal of Neurology.

[10]  David C. Han,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy: the financial impact of practice changes. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  M. Back,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  J C Froment,et al.  Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  H. Weskott,et al.  [B-flow--a new method for detecting blood flow]. , 2000, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[14]  A. Davies,et al.  Selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  A. Salvian,et al.  New duplex ultrasound scan criteria for managing symptomatic 50% or greater carotid stenosis. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  P. Collier,et al.  Changing trends in the use of preoperative carotid arteriography: the community experience. , 1998, Cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  C D Schleck,et al.  MR angiographic and sonographic indications for endarterectomy. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  E. Feldmann,et al.  Performance of carotid ultrasound in evaluating candidates for carotid endarterectomy is optimized by an approach based on clinical outcome rather than accuracy. , 1996, Stroke.

[19]  M Williams,et al.  Angiographic and Duplex Grading of Internal Carotid Stenosis: Can We Overcome the Confusion? , 1996, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[20]  F. Lexa,et al.  Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. , 1996, Stroke.

[21]  D S Sumner,et al.  Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  K. Kuntz,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients--is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  F. Lexa,et al.  Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  R. Edelman,et al.  Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? , 1995, Stroke.

[25]  D E Strandness,et al.  Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  M. Neale,et al.  Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  D S Sumner,et al.  Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: new velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[29]  P. Turski,et al.  Combined use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of patients with symptomatic ipsilateral high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[30]  A. AbuRahma,et al.  Complications of arteriography in a recent series of 707 cases: Factors affecting outcome , 1993, Annals of vascular surgery.

[31]  J. Polak,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy: preoperative evaluation of candidates with combined Doppler sonography and MR angiography. Work in progress. , 1993, Radiology.

[32]  C. Warlow,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis , 1991, The Lancet.

[33]  A J Molyneux,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[34]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[35]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision-making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Authors' reply , 2001 .

[36]  F. Tranquart,et al.  [B-flow ultrasonographic imaging of circulating blood]. , 2000, Journal de radiologie.

[37]  J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. , 1998, Journal of insurance medicine.

[38]  S. Simper,et al.  Carotid duplex scan versus angiography in evaluation of carotid artery disease. , 1994, The American surgeon.

[39]  G. Moneta,et al.  Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[40]  J R Waugh,et al.  Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. , 1992, Radiology.