Performance of a diagnostic system (Iliad) as a tool for quality assurance.

Quality Assurance improves health care through detection of quality problems and feedback to the care giver. Current review procedures employed by the Peer Review Organizations (PROs), however, appear to underdetect quality problems, particularly those arising from diagnostic errors. We studied the use of an expert diagnostic system, Iliad, to detect quality problems arising from diagnostic errors. 100 cases were selected from among those Medicare cases reviewed by the Utah PRO (UPRO) and which contained diagnoses recognized by Iliad. Iliad flagged 28 cases out of the 100 as containing diagnostic errors, and a gold standard physician review confirmed quality problems in 17 cases (60.7%). The UPRO review found 28 cases with quality problems, mostly treatment and documentation errors. The quality problems detected by Iliad appeared to be more serious than those detected by the UPRO review. Among the six cases with quality problems detected by both the UPRO and Iliad review, there was none for which the same quality problem was detected by the two procedures. The two review procedures were therefore complementary.

[1]  A. Pelberg.  Missed Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Room , 1989, Quality assurance and utilization review : official journal of the American College of Utilization Review Physicians.

[2]  P. Paris,et al.  A computer-assisted quality assurance system for an emergency medical service. , 1985, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[3]  J P Kassirer,et al.  Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Brook,et al.  Appropriateness of acute medical care for the elderly: an analysis of the literature. , 1989, Health policy.

[5]  Peter J. Haug,et al.  ILIAD as an Expert Consultant to Teach Differential Diagnosis , 1988 .

[6]  A. Vanagunas,et al.  Principles of quality assurance. , 1979, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[7]  C R Key,et al.  The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades. Toward an understanding of necessary fallibility. , 1989, JAMA.

[8]  The relation of medical problem solving and therapeutic errors to disease categories. , 1989, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[9]  I. Adams,et al.  Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. , 1986, British medical journal.

[10]  R H Brook,et al.  Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. , 1987, JAMA.

[11]  A Donabedian,et al.  Quality assessment and assurance: unity of purpose, diversity of means. , 1988, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[12]  J. Williamson,et al.  Assessing quality of ambulatory care. , 1990, QA review : quality assurance news and views.

[13]  I. Talbot,et al.  Clinical diagnosis: a post-mortem assessment of accuracy in the 1980s. , 1985, Postgraduate medical journal.