Changes in incisor third-order inclination resulting from vertical variation in lingual bracket placement.

OBJECTIVE To test the null hypothesis that third-order measurements are not correlated to lingual incisor features seen on radiographs. MATERIAL AND METHODS The lateral headfilms of 38 untreated, norm-occlusion subjects without incisor abrasions or restorations were used for third-order measurements of upper and lower central incisors and assessment of the inclination of four sites suitable for lingual bracket placement with reference to the occlusal plane perpendicular. Lingual sections were determined by the tangents at the incisal fossa (S1), at the transition plateau between incisal fossa and the cingulum (S2), by a constructed line reaching from the incisal tip to the cingulum (S3), and by a tangent at the cingulum convexity (S4). Third-order angles were also assessed on corresponding dental casts using an incisor inclination gauge. Regression analysis was performed using the third-order measurements of both methods as the dependent variables and the inclination of the lingual enamel sections (S1, S2, S3, S4) as the independent variables. RESULTS The null hypothesis was rejected. For the most common bracket application sites located on the lingual shovel (S1 and S2), third-order inclination changes of 0.4-0.7 degrees are expected for each degree of change in the inclination of the lingual surface. The impact of bracket placement errors on third-order angulation is similar between sections S1 and S2 and the cingulum convexity (S4). Section S3 proved to be least affected by interindividual variation. CONCLUSION The third-order measurements are correlated to lingual incisor features. Accordingly, third-order changes resulting from variation in lingual bracket placement can be individually predicted from radiographic assessments.

[1]  Silvia Geron,et al.  Vertical forces in labial and lingual orthodontics applied on maxillary incisors--a theoretical approach. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  T. Brosh,et al.  Bracket placement in lingual vs labial systems and direct vs indirect bonding. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  J. Degrieck,et al.  Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque. , 2005, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  Hong Rk,et al.  A new customized lingual indirect bonding system. , 2000 .

[5]  S. Geron The lingual bracket jig. , 1999, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[6]  S Richmond,et al.  Assessing incisor inclination: a non-invasive technique. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[7]  R J Isaacson,et al.  Three biologic variables modifying faciolingual tooth angulation by straight-wire appliances. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  P L Sadowsky,et al.  Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisor. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  L. Andrews The six keys to normal occlusion. , 1972, American journal of orthodontics.

[10]  D. Kubein-Meesenburg,et al.  The third-order angle and the maxillary incisor's inclination to the NA line. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  Kyoto Takemoto,et al.  Invisible Orthodontics: Current Concepts and Solutions in Lingual Orthodontics , 2003 .

[12]  K Takemoto,et al.  The straight-wire concept in lingual orthodontics. , 2001, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[13]  J. Park,et al.  A new customized lingual indirect bonding system. , 2000, Journal of clinical orthodontics.