Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) seems likely to open a new era of the field of noninvasive electrical stimulation of the human brain by directly interfering with cortical rhythms. It is expected to synchronize (by one single resonance frequency) or desynchronize (e.g., by the application of several frequencies) cortical oscillations. If applied long enough it may cause neuroplastic effects. In the theta range it may improve cognition when applied in phase. Alpha rhythms could improve motor performance, whereas beta intrusion may deteriorate them. TACS with both alpha and beta frequencies has a high likelihood to induce retinal phosphenes. Gamma intrusion can possibly interfere with attention. Stimulation in the “ripple” range induces intensity dependent inhibition or excitation in the motor cortex (M1) most likely by entrainment of neuronal networks, whereas stimulation in the low kHz range induces excitation by neuronal membrane interference. TACS in the 200 kHz range may have a potential in oncology.

[1]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[2]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  S. Schiff,et al.  Sensitivity of Neurons to Weak Electric Fields , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Nelson,et al.  Selective reconfiguration of layer 4 visual cortical circuitry by visual deprivation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  A. P. Bannister,et al.  Inter- and intra-laminar connections of pyramidal cells in the neocortex , 2005, Neuroscience Research.

[7]  J. Born,et al.  Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory , 2006, Nature.

[8]  E. Dekel,et al.  Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Yuzhuo Su,et al.  Spike Timing Amplifies the Effect of Electric Fields on Neurons: Implications for Endogenous Field Effects , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Chun-I Yeh,et al.  Temporal precision in the neural code and the timescales of natural vision , 2007, Nature.

[11]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  B. Nolan.  Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory , 2008 .

[13]  D. Lewis,et al.  GABA neurons and the mechanisms of network oscillations: implications for understanding cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia. , 2008, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[14]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Electrical Stimulation of the Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[15]  R. Malenka,et al.  Synaptic Plasticity: Multiple Forms, Functions, and Mechanisms , 2008, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[16]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  L. Marshall,et al.  Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Peter Brown,et al.  Boosting Cortical Activity at Beta-Band Frequencies Slows Movement in Humans , 2009, Current Biology.

[19]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Individual Alpha Activity in Human EEG , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  L. Parra,et al.  Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Dennis J. L. G. Schutter,et al.  Retinal origin of phosphenes to transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Boosting brain excitability by transcranial high frequency stimulation in the ripple range , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Géza Gergely Ambrus,et al.  Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: Comparison of tDCS and tRNS , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  A. Fedorov,et al.  Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation in optic neuropathy. , 2010, NeuroRehabilitation.

[25]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  G. Kovács,et al.  The enhancement of cortical excitability over the DLPFC before and during training impairs categorization in the prototype distortion task , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Non-invasive alternating current stimulation improves vision in optic neuropathy. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[28]  I. Bar-Gad,et al.  Magnetic stimulation intensity modulates motor inhibition , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  Improving working memory: Exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Frequency Specific Modulation of Human Somatosensory Cortex , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[31]  Alon Korngreen,et al.  Mechanisms of Magnetic Stimulation of Central Nervous System Neurons , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Random Noise Stimulation Improves Neuroplasticity in Perceptual Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the low kHz range increases motor cortex excitability. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[34]  R. Shapley,et al.  Is Gamma-Band Activity in the Local Field Potential of V1 Cortex a “Clock” or Filtered Noise? , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Nitsche,et al.  The Importance of Timing in Segregated Theta Phase-Coupling for Cognitive Performance , 2012, Current Biology.

[36]  S. Treue,et al.  Transcranial alternating stimulation in a high gamma frequency range applied over V1 improves contrast perception but does not modulate spatial attention , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[37]  Theodoros Samaras,et al.  Theoretical investigation of transcranial alternating current stimulation using realistic head model , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[38]  Tipu Z. Aziz,et al.  Driving Oscillatory Activity in the Human Cortex Enhances Motor Performance , 2012, Current Biology.

[39]  Carsten H. Wolters,et al.  Good vibrations: Oscillatory phase shapes perception , 2012, NeuroImage.

[40]  A. Antal,et al.  Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[41]  P. Brown,et al.  Tremor Suppression by Rhythmic Transcranial Current Stimulation , 2013, Current Biology.

[42]  W Paulus,et al.  Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation. , 2013, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[43]  Debora Brignani,et al.  Is Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Effective in Modulating Brain Oscillations? , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Effects of 10Hz and 20Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[45]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Ohm’s law and tDCS over the centuries , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..