Facilitating knowledge creation by knowledge assets

A comprehensive and feasible model that delineates the interrelationships between knowledge assets and knowledge creation processes is absent. This study aims to fill this void. Unlike previous research, this study investigates the interrelations among four categories of knowledge assets and four knowledge creation processes - socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (SECI). In our framework, we argued that different types of knowledge assets may have differing influences on knowledge creation. In order to test the feasibility of this framework, we conducted an empirical research. This study employed a survey instrument to collect data from a wide variety of organizations in manufacturing, trade, transportation and service industries, computer industries, finance, and academic institution. A total of 204 usable responses were analyzed. We identified four interrelationships from this study. (1) Compared to other knowledge assets, conceptual knowledge assets have a greater effect on externalization of knowledge creation process; (2) Compared to other knowledge assets, routine knowledge assets have a greater effect on socialization of knowledge creation process; (3) Compared to other knowledge assets, experiential knowledge assets do not have a greater effect on internalization of knowledge creation process; and (4) Compared to other knowledge assets, systemic knowledge assets do not have a greater effect on combination of knowledge creation process. The implications of the study are discussed, and further research directions are proposed.

[1]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  I. Nonaka,et al.  BUILDING A FOUNDATION FOR KNOWLEDGE CREATION , 1998 .

[3]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research , 2000 .

[4]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[5]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[6]  AlaviMaryam,et al.  Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems , 2001 .

[7]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[8]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[9]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings , 1998 .

[10]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[11]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Fons Wijnhoven,et al.  Development Scenarios for Organizational Memory Information Systems , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  I. Nonaka.  Redundant, Overlapping Organization: A Japanese Approach to Managing the Innovation Process , 1990 .

[14]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[16]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[17]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Computer-Aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments , 1998, MIS Q..

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[19]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[20]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information Technology , 1999, MIS Q..

[21]  P. Weill,et al.  Management by Maxim: How Business and IT Managers Can Create IT Infrastructures , 1997 .