A conceptual model to facilitate knowledge sharing in multi-agent systems

This paper presents and motivates an extended ontology knowledge model which represents semantic information about concepts explicitly. This knowledge model results from enriching the standard conceptual model with semantic information which precisely characterises the concept’s properties and expected ambiguities, including which properties are prototypical of a concept and which are exceptional, the behaviour of properties over time and the degree of applicability of properties to subconcepts. This enriched conceptual model permits a precise characterisation of what is represented by class membership mechanisms and helps knowledge engineers to determine, in a straightforward manner, the meta-properties holding for a concept. Meta-properties are recognised to be the main tool for a formal ontological analysis that allows building ontologies with a clean and untangled taxonomic structure. This enriched semantics can prove useful to describe what is known by agents in a multi-agent systems, as it facilitates the use of reasoning mechanisms on the knowledge that instantiate the ontology. These mechanisms can be used to solve ambiguities that can arise when heterogeneous agents have to interoperate in order to perform a task.

[1]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agent Software , 1995 .

[2]  H. S. Pinto Knowledge Sharing and Reuse , 2022 .

[3]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Intelligent agents: theory and practice The Knowledge Engineering Review , 1995 .

[4]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agents That Reason and Negotiate by Arguing , 1998, J. Log. Comput..

[5]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[6]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  SMART: Automated Support for Ontology Merging and Alignment , 1999 .

[7]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Identity, Unity, and Individuality: Towards a Formal Toolkit for Ontological Analysis , 2000, ECAI.

[8]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Towards a methodology for ontology based model engineering , 2000 .

[9]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine , 1983 .

[10]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Supporting Inheritance Mechanisms in Ontology Representation , 2000, EKAW.

[11]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic interoperability in global information systems , 1999, SGMD.

[12]  Friedrich Steimann,et al.  On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modelling , 2000, Data Knowl. Eng..

[13]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[14]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontological Engineering: A state of the Art , 1999 .

[15]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods , 1998, Data Knowl. Eng..

[16]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems , 1997 .

[17]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments , 2000, ICCS.

[18]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  An Ontology of Meta-Level Categories , 1994, KR.

[19]  Jose Manuel Corera,et al.  Building and Reusing Ontologies for Electrical Network Applications , 1996, ECAI.

[20]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  A Formal Ontology of Properties , 2000, EKAW.

[21]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Qualitative Probabilities for Default Reasoning, Belief Revision, and Causal Modeling , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies , 2000, KR.

[23]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[24]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations , 1992, Data Knowl. Eng..

[25]  Leora Morgenstern,et al.  Inheritance Comes of Age: Applying Nonmonotonic Techniques to Problems in Industry , 1997, IJCAI.

[26]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  OKBC: A Programmatic Foundation for Knowledge Base Interoperability , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.