Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

RAD53 and MEC1 are essential genes required for the transcriptional and cell cycle responses to DNA damage and DNA replication blocks. We have examined the essential function of these genes and found that their lethality but not their checkpoint defects can be suppressed by increased expression of genes encoding ribonucleotide reductase. Analysis of viable null alleles revealed that Mec1 plays a greater role in response to inhibition of DNA synthesis than Rad53. The loss of survival in mec1 and rad53 null or point mutants in response to transient inhibition of DNA synthesis is not a result of inappropriate anaphase entry but primarily to an inability to complete chromosome replication. We propose that this checkpoint pathway plays an important role in the maintenance of DNA synthetic capabilities when DNA replication is stressed.

[1]  J. Diffley,et al.  A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication , 1998, Nature.

[2]  N. Walworth,et al.  S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. , 1998, Genes & development.

[3]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. , 1998, Methods in molecular medicine.

[4]  C. Westphal,et al.  Atm-dependent interactions of a mammalian Chk1 homolog with meiotic chromosomes , 1997, Current Biology.

[5]  S. Elledge,et al.  Identification of RNR4, encoding a second essential small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[6]  S. Elledge,et al.  Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. , 1997, Science.

[7]  C. Peng,et al.  Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216. , 1997, Science.

[8]  N. Rhind,et al.  Cdc25 mitotic inducer targeted by chk1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. , 1997, Science.

[9]  M. Groudine,et al.  Reconstitution of a MEC1-independent checkpoint in yeast by expression of a novel human fork head cDNA , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[10]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  Cell Cycle Checkpoints: Preventing an Identity Crisis , 1996, Science.

[11]  P. Leder,et al.  Pleiotropic defects in ataxia-telangiectasia protein-deficient mice. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. , 1996, Genes & development.

[13]  Francis Collins,et al.  Atm-Deficient Mice: A Paradigm of Ataxia Telangiectasia , 1996, Cell.

[14]  D. Stern,et al.  Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. , 1996, Genes & development.

[15]  S. Elledge,et al.  Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-Like Kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in Yeast Cell Cycle Checkpoint Pathways , 1996, Science.

[16]  R. Bernards,et al.  rad-Dependent Response of the chk1-Encoded Protein Kinase at the DNA Damage Checkpoint , 1996, Science.

[17]  M. Meyn,et al.  Ataxia-telangiectasia and cellular responses to DNA damage. , 1995, Cancer research.

[18]  Antony M. Carr,et al.  The chk1 pathway is required to prevent mitosis following cell-cycle arrest at ‘start’ , 1995, Current Biology.

[19]  F. Collins,et al.  TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1 , 1995, Cell.

[20]  J. Gassenhuber,et al.  TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene , 1995, Cell.

[21]  Bruce Stillman,et al.  ORC and Cdc6p interact and determine the frequency of initiation of DNA replication in the genome , 1995, Cell.

[22]  H. Murakami,et al.  A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase , 1995, Nature.

[23]  S. Elledge,et al.  DNA polymerase ϵ links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint , 1995, Cell.

[24]  S. Elledge,et al.  The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. , 1994, Genes & development.

[25]  S. Elledge,et al.  A family of vectors that facilitate transposon and insertional mutagenesis of cloned genes in yeast , 1994, Yeast.

[26]  H. Ogawa,et al.  An essential gene, ESR1, is required for mitotic cell growth, DNA repair and meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  A. Carr,et al.  14-3-3 protein homologs required for the DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. , 1994, Science.

[28]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. , 1994, Genes & development.

[29]  A. Carr,et al.  Identification and characterization of new elements involved in checkpoint and feedback controls in fission yeast. , 1994, Molecular biology of the cell.

[30]  J. R. Johnston Molecular genetics of yeast :a practical approach , 1994 .

[31]  S. Elledge,et al.  DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast , 1993, Cell.

[32]  Scott Davey,et al.  Fission yeast chkl protein kinase links the rad checkpoint pathway to cdc2 , 1993, Nature.

[33]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. , 1993, Genetics.

[34]  A. Jackson,et al.  Cell cycle regulation of the yeast Cdc7 protein kinase by association with the Dbf4 protein , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[35]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia-telangiectasia , 1992, Cell.

[36]  A. Carr,et al.  Fission yeast genes involved in coupling mitosis to completion of DNA replication. , 1992, Genes & development.

[37]  S. Elledge,et al.  Isolation of crt mutants constitutive for transcription of the DNA damage inducible gene RNR3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1992, Genetics.

[38]  S. Elledge,et al.  Ribonucleotide reductase: regulation, regulation, regulation. , 1992, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[39]  D. Botstein,et al.  A group of interacting yeast DNA replication genes. , 1991, Genes & development.

[40]  R. W. Davis,et al.  Lambda YES: a multifunctional cDNA expression vector for the isolation of genes by complementation of yeast and Escherichia coli mutations. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  M. Costanzo,et al.  Analysis and manipulation of yeast mitochondrial genes. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[42]  R. W. Davis,et al.  Two genes differentially regulated in the cell cycle and by DNA-damaging agents encode alternative regulatory subunits of ribonucleotide reductase. , 1990, Genes & development.

[43]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[44]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. , 1988, Gene.

[45]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Fidelity of DNA synthesis. , 1982, Annual review of biochemistry.

[46]  A. Fersht Fidelity of replication of phage phi X174 DNA by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: spontaneous mutation by misincorporation. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  G. Fink,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics , 1979 .