Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound of uterine leiomyomas: review of a 12-month outcome of 130 clinical patients.

PURPOSE To assess 12-month outcomes and safety of clinical magnetic resonance (MR)-guided focused ultrasound (US) treatments of uterine leiomyomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between March 2005 and December 2009, 150 women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas were clinically treated with MR-guided focused US at a single institution; 130 patients completed treatment and agreed to have their data used for research purposes. Patients were followed through retrospective review of medical records and phone interviews conducted at 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals after treatment to assess additional procedures and symptom relief. Outcome measures and treatment complications were analyzed for possible correlations with the appearance of the tumors on T2-weighted imaging. RESULTS The cumulative incidence of additional tumor-related treatments 12 months after MR-guided focused US was 7.4% by the Kaplan-Meier method. At 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, 86% (90 of 105), 93% (92 of 99), and 88% (78 of 89) of patients reported relief of symptoms, respectively. No statistically significant correlation between tumor appearance on T2-weighted imaging and 12-month outcome was found. Treatment-related complications were observed in 17 patients (13.1%): 16 patients had minor complications and one had a major complication (deep vein thrombosis). All complications were resolved within the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS MR-guided focused US is a noninvasive treatment option that can be used to effectively and safely treat uterine leiomyomas and delivers significant and lasting symptom relief for at least 12 months. The incidence of additional treatment during this time period is comparable with those in previous reports of uterine artery embolization.

[1]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[2]  Graves Ej,et al.  National Hospital Discharge Survey: annual summary, 1992. , 1994, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[3]  E. Graves National hospital discharge survey: annual summary, 1991. , 1993, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[4]  B. S. Verkauf,et al.  Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation. , 1992, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  Elizabeth A Stewart,et al.  Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  H. Peterson,et al.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988‐1990 , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  E L Kaplan NON-PARAMETRIC ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATION , 1958 .

[8]  Matthias David,et al.  Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  E. Levy,et al.  Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomata , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  B. Giraudeau,et al.  Predictive factors for fibroids recurrence after uterine artery embolisation , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[11]  Joel P Felmlee,et al.  Noninvasive treatment of uterine fibroids: early Mayo Clinic experience with magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[12]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Chronic gynecological conditions reported by US women: findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1984 to 1992. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[13]  Krzysztof R. Gorny,et al.  A Clinical Review of Focused Ultrasound Ablation With Magnetic Resonance Guidance: An Option for Treating Uterine Fibroids , 2008, Ultrasound quarterly.

[14]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Focused US system for MR imaging-guided tumor ablation. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--imaging predictors of success. , 2008, Radiology.

[16]  K. Funaki,et al.  Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance‐guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24‐month follow‐up , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  Mary Ann Lumsden,et al.  Embolization versus myomectomy versus hysterectomy: which is best, when? , 2002, Human reproduction.

[18]  M. Mauro,et al.  The FIBROID Registry: Symptom and Quality-of-Life Status 1 Year After Therapy , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  J P Felmlee,et al.  MR guided focused ultrasound: technical acceptance measures for a clinical system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Graves Ej,et al.  National Hospital Discharge Survey , 2004 .

[21]  M. Broder,et al.  The Appropriateness of Recommendations for Hysterectomy , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  David B Dunson,et al.  High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  Y. Kaji,et al.  Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroids: relationship between the therapeutic effects and signal intensity of preexisting T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  S. LeBlang,et al.  Leiomyoma shrinkage after MRI-guided focused ultrasound treatment: report of 80 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  L. Kozak,et al.  National hospital discharge survey: annual summary, 1996. , 1999, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[26]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. , 2003, Radiology.