Learning variables, in-class laptop multitasking and academic performance: A path analysis

This study examines the relationships among learning variables, multitasking, and academic performance. Based on a survey with 176 college students, zero-order correlations were first tested between multitasking behaviors and grade. After identifying the relevant multitasking behavior (i.e., multitasking with laptops in lecture halls), the multitasking pattern was entered into a path analysis in order to understand its impact on grade, in comparison to learning variables. It is found that in-class laptop multitasking has a negative impact on grade, with an effect size similar to the impacts of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, although in a reversed direction. Furthermore, the path analysis shows that self-regulation behaviors are negatively associated with in-class laptop multitasking, suggesting that we should look at in-class laptop multitasking as lack of self-regulation. Finally, the results indicate that self-efficacy and extrinsic motivation influence self-regulation behaviors, implying that educators and parents need to encourage students' self-regulation of laptop multitasking behaviors through building students' senses of self-efficacy and learning motivations (or employing strategies where laptops are used deliberately as part of class), instead of simply banning laptops in classrooms. In-class laptop multitasking has a negative impact on grade.The effect size of multitasking is similar to intrinsic and extrinsic motivations.Self-regulation behaviors are negatively associated with multitasking.The paper recommends building students' self-efficacy and learning motivations.

[1]  Bettina Seipp Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings , 1991 .

[2]  Zhang Weiyu Multitasking with New Media in Large classrooms: Findings from Online Survey and Focus Groups , 2009 .

[3]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Su-Yen Chen,et al.  College Female and Male Heavy Internet Users' Profiles of Practices and Their Academic Grades and Psychosocial Adjustment , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[6]  Sarah R. Baker,et al.  Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance , 2004 .

[7]  Carrie B. Fried,et al.  In-class laptop use and its e V ects on student learning , 2006 .

[8]  J. H. Steiger Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[10]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  What else do college students "do" while studying? An investigation of multitasking , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Weiyu Zhang,et al.  Explicating multitasking with computers: Gratifications and situations , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Faria Sana,et al.  Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Self-Regulation and Academic Learning , 2000 .

[14]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[15]  U. Foehr MEDIA MULTITASKING AMONG AMERICAN YOUTH: PREVALENCE, PREDICTORS AND PAIRINGS , 2006 .

[16]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[17]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with AMOS , 2010 .

[18]  M. Prensky Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[19]  Vivek Anand,et al.  A Study of Time Management: The Correlation between Video Game Usage and Academic Performance Markers , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Mladen Bubonjić,et al.  Odrastanje u digitalnom dobu - Wim Veen, Ben Vrakking: Homo zappiens: Growing up in a digital age, Network continuum education, London, 2006 , 2013 .

[21]  P. Pintrich The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning , 1999 .

[22]  B. Zimmerman A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[23]  Nicholas J Carson Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives, John Palfrey, Urs Gasser. Basic Books, New York (2008), 375 pp, $25.95 (hardcover) , 2010 .

[24]  B. Byrne,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. , 1996 .

[25]  Michel Burgum,et al.  Predicting Student Persistence and Performance in the First Year of a Tertiary Nursing Programme: A Pilot Study , 1993 .

[26]  Karin Archer,et al.  Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[27]  D. F. Roberts,et al.  The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. , 1987, Child development.

[28]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Facebook® and academic performance , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Samuel S. Peng,et al.  University Students' Internet Use and Its Relationships with Academic Performance, Interpersonal Relationships, Psychosocial Adjustment, and Self-Evaluation , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  Dawson R. Hancock,et al.  Effects of Test Anxiety and Evaluative Threat on Students' Achievement and Motivation , 2001 .

[31]  George R. Franke,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows , 1995 .

[32]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[33]  Anastasia Kononova,et al.  Multitasking Across Borders: A Cross-National Study of Media Multitasking Behaviors, Its Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2013 .

[34]  Theodore S. Smith,et al.  Effects of Cell-Phone and Text-Message Distractions on True and False Recognition , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[35]  Laura E. Levine,et al.  Electronic Media Use, Reading, and Academic Distractibility in College Youth , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  James J. Cummings,et al.  Multitasking on a Single Device: Arousal and the Frequency, Anticipation, and Prediction of Switching Between Media Content on a Computer , 2014 .

[37]  Weiyu Zhang,et al.  Situational Factors Competing for Attention , 2010, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[38]  Wade C. Jacobsen,et al.  The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[39]  R. Killen,et al.  Differences between Students' and Lecturers' Perceptions of Factors Influencing Students' Academic Success at University , 1994 .

[40]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Kelvin F H Lui,et al.  Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Veronika Karnowski,et al.  When lifestyle becomes behavior: A closer look at the situational context of mobile communication , 2014, Telematics Informatics.

[43]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[44]  Jonathan Rosen,et al.  Distractions, Distractions: Does Instant Messaging Affect College Students' Performance on a Concurrent Reading Comprehension Task? , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[45]  M. Zeidner,et al.  Test Anxiety: The State of the Art , 1998 .

[46]  Roland Marciniak Vient de paraître: "Born Digital Understanding The First Generation Of Digital Natives" (J. Palfrey and U. Gasser, 2010) , 2015 .

[47]  Geri Gay,et al.  The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments , 2003, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[48]  B. Byrne Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .