Applying Physics-Based Scoring to Calculate Free Energies of Binding for Single Amino Acid Mutations in Protein-Protein Complexes

Predicting changes in protein binding affinity due to single amino acid mutations helps us better understand the driving forces underlying protein-protein interactions and design improved biotherapeutics. Here, we use the MM-GBSA approach with the OPLS2005 force field and the VSGB2.0 solvent model to calculate differences in binding free energy between wild type and mutant proteins. Crucially, we made no changes to the scoring model as part of this work on protein-protein binding affinity—the energy model has been developed for structure prediction and has previously been validated only for calculating the energetics of small molecule binding. Here, we compare predictions to experimental data for a set of 418 single residue mutations in 21 targets and find that the MM-GBSA model, on average, performs well at scoring these single protein residue mutations. Correlation between the predicted and experimental change in binding affinity is statistically significant and the model performs well at picking “hotspots,” or mutations that change binding affinity by more than 1 kcal/mol. The promising performance of this physics-based method with no tuned parameters for predicting binding energies suggests that it can be transferred to other protein engineering problems.

[1]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Wells,et al.  Comparison of a structural and a functional epitope. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  R. Kelley,et al.  Analysis of the factor VIIa binding site on human tissue factor: effects of tissue factor mutations on the kinetics and thermodynamics of binding. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[4]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[5]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[6]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[7]  T. Clackson,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of the 1:1 growth hormone:receptor complex reveals the molecular basis for receptor affinity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  C. Kleanthous,et al.  Specificity in protein-protein recognition: conserved Im9 residues are the major determinants of stability in the colicin E9 DNase-Im9 complex. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[9]  A. Kortt,et al.  Effects of substitutions in the binding surface of an antibody on antigen affinity. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[10]  J. Kirsch,et al.  Energetic analysis of an antigen/antibody interface: Alanine scanning mutagenesis and double mutant cycles on the hyhel‐10/lysozyme interaction , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  P. Kollman,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein−Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies , 1999 .

[12]  J. Robinson,et al.  On the importance of being aromatic at an antibody-protein antigen interface: mutagenesis of the extracellular interferon gamma receptor and recognition by the neutralizing antibody A6. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  H W Hellinga,et al.  Dissection of the protein G B1 domain binding site for human IgG Fc fragment , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  W. Delano,et al.  Convergent solutions to binding at a protein-protein interface. , 2000, Science.

[15]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  John A. Robinson,et al.  Analysis of Antibody A6 Binding to the Extracellular Interferon γ Receptor α-Chain by Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis and Random Mutagenesis with Phage Display† , 2000 .

[17]  Yan Zhang,et al.  The bacterial cell‐division protein ZipA and its interaction with an FtsZ fragment revealed by X‐ray crystallography , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[18]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Enzyme-like proteins by computational design , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Kurt S. Thorn,et al.  ASEdb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the free energy of binding in protein interactions , 2001, Bioinform..

[20]  B Tidor,et al.  Preferential heterodimer formation via undercompensated electrostatic interactions. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Computational method to reduce the search space for directed protein evolution , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Rational cytokine design for increased lifetime and enhanced potency using pH-activated “histidine switching” , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Roles of mutation and recombination in the evolution of protein thermodynamics , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  George A. Kaminski,et al.  Force Field Validation Using Protein Side Chain Prediction , 2002 .

[26]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[27]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[28]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Computational Thermostabilization of an Enzyme , 2005, Science.

[29]  F. Rastinejad,et al.  Crystal structure analysis of phosphatidylcholine-GM2-activator product complexes: evidence for hydrolase activity. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[30]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  Very fast empirical prediction and rationalization of protein pKa values , 2005, Proteins.

[31]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Affinity enhancement of an in vivo matured therapeutic antibody using structure‐based computational design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  Nigel F. Delaney,et al.  Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins , 2006, Science.

[33]  David Baker,et al.  Rational Design of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Variants for Antagonizing Integrin Lymphocyte Function-associated Antigen-1-dependent Adhesion* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Paul D Lyne,et al.  Accurate prediction of the relative potencies of members of a series of kinase inhibitors using molecular docking and MM-GBSA scoring. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[35]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Jagat Narula,et al.  Molecular imaging in cardiology , 2007 .

[37]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Multiscale Optimization of a Truncated Newton Minimization Algorithm and Application to Proteins and Protein-Ligand Complexes. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[38]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Progress in computational protein design. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[39]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  Structure-based protocol for identifying mutations that enhance protein-protein binding affinities. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Improved Methods for Side Chain and Loop Predictions via the Protein Local Optimization Program:  Variable Dielectric Model for Implicitly Improving the Treatment of Polarization Effects. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[41]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Computationally Mapping Sequence Space To Understand Evolutionary Protein Engineering , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[42]  D. Powers Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Factor to ROC, Informedness, Markedness & Correlation , 2008 .

[43]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  Very fast prediction and rationalization of pKa values for protein–ligand complexes , 2008, Proteins.

[44]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.

[45]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  Directed enzyme evolution: climbing fitness peaks one amino acid at a time. , 2009, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[46]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Design of protein-interaction specificity affords selective bZIP-binding peptides , 2009, Nature.

[47]  Woody Sherman,et al.  High‐energy water sites determine peptide binding affinity and specificity of PDZ domains , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  G. C. Ferreira,et al.  Serine 254 Enhances an Induced Fit Mechanism in Murine 5-Aminolevulinate Synthase* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  Yaoqi Zhou,et al.  Improving computational protein design by using structure‐derived sequence profile , 2010, Proteins.

[50]  W. Sherman,et al.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[51]  Lance M. Westerhoff,et al.  Computational alanine scanning with linear scaling semiempirical quantum mechanical methods , 2010, Proteins.

[52]  Structural Determinants of Affinity Enhancement between GoLoco Motifs and G-Protein α Subunit Mutants* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  David Baker,et al.  An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[54]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Computational design of second‐site suppressor mutations at protein–protein interfaces , 2010, Proteins.

[55]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Contribution of Explicit Solvent Effects to the Binding Affinity of Small‐Molecule Inhibitors in Blood Coagulation Factor Serine Proteases , 2011, ChemMedChem.

[56]  R. Friesner,et al.  The VSGB 2.0 model: A next generation energy model for high resolution protein structure modeling , 2011, Proteins.

[57]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Mechanism of the hydrophobic effect in the biomolecular recognition of arylsulfonamides by carbonic anhydrase , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Jaques Reifman,et al.  Quantitative Predictions of Binding Free Energy Changes in Drug-Resistant Influenza Neuraminidase , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[59]  Hervé Minoux,et al.  Engineering Protein Therapeutics: Predictive Performances of a Structure-Based Virtual Affinity Maturation Protocol , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[60]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.