New design and development of a manual wheelchair for India

Purpose. The most common methods of delivering assistive technology in developing countries are charitable donation and workshops. This describes a new approach to solving the problem, a collaboration undertaken by a US-based lab and a manufacturer in India to produce quality wheelchairs. One goal is to publicize the design free of charge to manufacturers and interested parties world-wide. The process, a demonstration of a new technology transfer method, and the product, an adult manual wheelchair, are described. Method. An iterative process occurred over four years to design and produce the wheelchair. This consisted of prototypes, small production runs, ANSI/RESNA testing, hardness and tensile testing and informal user testing. Results. The design is a manual folding cross-brace design with several points of adjustability. Final pre-production prototypes experienced fastener failures during durability testing. Higher grade bolts were specified. Trial-run production has begun. An ANSI/RESNA wheelchair test lab was constructed in India. Subsequent projects include power and pediatric tilt-in-space wheelchairs. Conclusions. The approach seems promising as a method to improve the quality of assistive technology available in India and begin to meet the vast need in India. Pitfalls encountered throughout the collaboration are described in this paper along with solutions to remedy these problems for future projects.

[1]  R N Robertson,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of depot versus rehabilitation manual wheelchairs. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  M. M. DiGiovine,et al.  User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  R L Kirby,et al.  Static rear stability of conventional and lightweight variable-axle-position wheelchairs. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Kirby Rl,et al.  Static rear stability of conventional and lightweight variable-axle-position wheelchairs. , 1985 .

[5]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Alternative Modes of Manual Wheelchair Ambulation: An Overview , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  M. Boninger,et al.  Comparison of fatigue life for 3 types of manual wheelchairs. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  R A Cooper,et al.  Fatigue-life of two manual wheelchair cross-brace designs. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Towards the development of an effective technology transfer model of wheelchairs to developing countries , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[9]  G Mukherjee,et al.  Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  P. Braveman,et al.  Measuring Health Equity Within Countries: The Challenge of Limited Information , 2002 .

[11]  R A Cooper,et al.  Evaluation of selected ultralight manual wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Comparison of fatigue life for three types of manual wheelchairs , 1999, Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference. 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and the 1999 Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (Cat. N.