Frequencies of 4 Distinct Patterns of Glaucomatous Disc Appearance and Their Clinical Associations in Japanese Population-based Studies

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Purpose: To study the frequencies and factors associated with 4 disc patterns in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) identified in population-based studies: focal glaucomatous (FG type), generalized enlargement of cup (GE type), myopic glaucomatous (MG type), and senile sclerotic glaucomatous (SS type) patterns. Subjects: In total, 270 disc photographs of acceptable quality were extracted from the records of 270 definitive POAG cases diagnosed according to the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology Criteria in 2 Japanese population-based glaucoma surveys. One randomly chosen eye from the bilateral POAG cases was included. Results: Using a method of κ coefficient of reproducibility of classification of 0.80 according to a preliminary study, 143 discs were classified as FG, GE, MG, or SS types with respective frequencies of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48-66), 33% (95% CI, 25-42), 7% (95% CI, 3-13), and 3% (95% CI, 0-7), and 127 discs as the miscellaneous type. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that the MG type was associated (P=0.052, 0.025, 0.019, and 0.018) with younger age, lower body mass index (BMI), and greater disc area and ovality, and the GE type was associated (P<0.001, 0.036, and 0.056) with greater disc area, corneal radius, and hyperopic refraction than the FG type. Conclusions: The FG type occurs most frequently in Japanese POAG followed by the GE type. The MG and SS types occurred much less often than previously reported in Japanese. Associations with age, BMI, disc area and ovality, refraction, and corneal radius differed among the FG, GE, and MG types.

[1]  A. Iwase,et al.  Morphology of the optic disc in the Tajimi Study population , 2017, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  A. Iwase,et al.  Optic disc, rim and peripapillary chorioretinal atrophy in normal Japanese eyes: the Kumejima Study , 2017, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[3]  A. Iwase,et al.  Primary open-angle glaucoma in a population associated with high prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma: the Kumejima Study. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[4]  M. Haustein,et al.  Morphological and functional differences between normal‐tension and high‐tension glaucoma , 2013, Acta ophthalmologica.

[5]  Paul H Artes,et al.  Peripapillary choroidal thickness in healthy controls and patients with focal, diffuse, and sclerotic glaucomatous optic disc damage. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  T. Nakazawa,et al.  Progression of Visual Field Defects in Eyes With Different Optic Disc Appearances in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma , 2012, Journal of glaucoma.

[7]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Rates of change in the visual field and optic disc in patients with distinct patterns of glaucomatous optic disc damage. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[8]  N. Jansonius,et al.  Myopia as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[9]  R. Ritch,et al.  Rates of visual field progression in distinct optic disc phenotypes , 2011, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Iwase,et al.  Intraocular pressure and related systemic and ocular biometric factors in a population-based study in Japan: the Kumejima study. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Relationship of the 24-hour pattern of intraocular pressure with optic disc appearance in primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[12]  A. Iwase,et al.  Ocular and systemic factors related to intraocular pressure in Japanese adults: the Tajimi study , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  A. Iwase,et al.  Refractive Errors and the Relating Factors in a Rural Southern Island of Japan. The Kumejima Study , 2008 .

[14]  A. Iwase,et al.  Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: the Tajimi study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[15]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  Factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  Finite element modeling of optic nerve head biomechanics. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  A. Iwase,et al.  The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[18]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Visual field and optic disc progression in patients with different types of optic disc damage: a longitudinal prospective study. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[19]  P. Foster,et al.  The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Agreement among clinicians in the recognition of patterns of optic disk damage in glaucoma. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  R. T. Hart,et al.  The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: initial finite element modeling. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  S M Drance,et al.  Optic disk appearances in primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[23]  D. Broadway,et al.  Glaucoma and vasospasm , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  Y. Yamazaki,et al.  Optic disc findings in normal tension glaucoma. , 1997, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Various glaucomatous optic nerve appearances. A color Doppler imaging study of retrobulbar circulation. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[26]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Various glaucomatous optic nerve appearances: clinical correlations. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[27]  G. Tomita,et al.  Interocular asymmetry of optic disc size and its relevance to visual field loss in normal-tension glaucoma , 1994, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[28]  G. Spaeth,et al.  A new classification of glaucoma including focal glaucoma. , 1994, Survey of ophthalmology.

[29]  A. Tuulonen,et al.  Optic disc size in exfoliative, primary open angle, and low-tension glaucoma. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  J. Jonas,et al.  Parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy in normal and glaucoma eyes. II. Correlations. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  照屋 絵厘子,et al.  Intraocular pressure and related systemic and ocular biometric factors in a population-based study in Japan : the Kumejima study , 2011 .

[32]  M. Araie,et al.  A comparative study of optic nerve head in low- and high-tension glaucomas , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[33]  Douglas R. Anderson Automated Static Perimetry , 1992 .

[34]  H. C. Geijssen,et al.  The spectrum of primary open angle glaucoma. I: Senile sclerotic glaucoma versus high tension glaucoma. , 1987, Ophthalmic surgery.