Stationary distributions of persistent ecological systems

We analyze ecological systems that are influenced by random environmental fluctuations. We first provide general conditions which ensure that the species coexist and the system converges to a unique invariant probability measure (stationary distribution). Since it is usually impossible to characterize this invariant probability measure analytically, we develop a powerful method for numerically approximating invariant probability measures. This allows us to shed light upon how the various parameters of the ecosystem impact the stationary distribution. We analyze different types of environmental fluctuations. At first we study ecosystems modeled by stochastic differential equations. In the second setting we look at piecewise deterministic Markov processes. These are processes where one follows a system of differential equations for a random time, after which the environmental state changes, and one follows a different set of differential equations-this procedure then gets repeated indefinitely. Finally, we look at stochastic differential equations with switching, which take into account both the white noise fluctuations and the random environmental switches. As applications of our theoretical and numerical analysis, we look at competitive Lotka-Volterra, Beddington-DeAngelis predator-prey, and rock-paper-scissors dynamics. We highlight new biological insights by analyzing the stationary distributions of the ecosystems and by seeing how various types of environmental fluctuations influence the long term fate of populations.

[1]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[2]  M. Freidlin,et al.  ON SMALL RANDOM PERTURBATIONS OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS , 1970 .

[3]  W. Fleming Stochastically perturbed dynamical systems , 1974 .

[4]  Charles J. Holland,et al.  Ergodic expansions in small noise problems , 1974 .

[5]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A Model for Tropic Interaction , 1975 .

[6]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .

[7]  J. Beddington,et al.  Mutual Interference Between Parasites or Predators and its Effect on Searching Efficiency , 1975 .

[8]  M. Turelli Random environments and stochastic calculus. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  R. Holt Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  Charles J. Holland,et al.  STOCHASTICALLY PERTURBED LIMIT CYCLES , 1978 .

[11]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest , 1978 .

[12]  Y. Kifer The exit problem for small random perturbations of dynamical systems with a hyperbolic fixed point , 1981 .

[13]  Yukio Ogura,et al.  Recurrence properties of Lotka-Volterra models with random fluctuations , 1981 .

[14]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  A general cooperation theorem for hypercycles , 1981 .

[16]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The stabilizing effect of a random environment , 1982 .

[17]  M. V. Day,et al.  Exponential Leveling for Stochastically Perturbed Dynamical Systems , 1982 .

[18]  V. Hutson,et al.  A theorem on average Liapunov functions , 1984 .

[19]  Mark H. A. Davis Piecewise‐Deterministic Markov Processes: A General Class of Non‐Diffusion Stochastic Models , 1984 .

[20]  Harold J. Kushner,et al.  Nearly optimal singular controls for wideband noise driven systems , 1988 .

[21]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Invasibility and stochastic boundedness in monotonic competition models , 1989 .

[22]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Uniform persistence and repellors for maps , 1989 .

[23]  A. B. Roy,et al.  Limit cycles in a prey-predator system , 1993 .

[24]  P. Chesson Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments , 1994 .

[25]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .

[27]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies , 1996, Nature.

[28]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[29]  R. Holt,et al.  APPARENT COMPETITION OR APPARENT MUTUALISM? SHARED PREDATION WHEN POPULATIONS CYCLE , 1998 .

[30]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Geometric Analysis of Ecological Models with Slow and Fast Processes , 2000, Ecosystems.

[31]  Chris Cosner,et al.  On the Dynamics of Predator–Prey Models with the Beddington–DeAngelis Functional Response☆ , 2001 .

[32]  A. Veretennikov,et al.  On the poisson equation and diffusion approximation 3 , 2001, math/0506596.

[33]  C. Klausmeier,et al.  Competition of Phytoplankton under Fluctuating Light , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Tzy-Wei Hwang,et al.  Global analysis of the predator–prey system with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response , 2003 .

[35]  A. Veretennikov,et al.  © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2003 ON POISSON EQUATION AND DIFFUSION APPROXIMATION 2 1 , 2022 .

[36]  David Steinsaltz,et al.  Markov mortality models: implications of quasistationarity and varying initial distributions. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  A. Hastings,et al.  Ecosystem Engineers: Feedback and Population Dynamics , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[38]  G. Yin,et al.  On competitive Lotka-Volterra model in random environments , 2009 .

[39]  G. Yin,et al.  Hybrid Switching Diffusions: Properties and Applications , 2009 .

[40]  D. Steinsaltz,et al.  Quasilimiting behavior for one-dimensional diffusions with killing , 2010, 1004.5044.

[41]  M. Haque,et al.  A detailed study of the Beddington-DeAngelis predator-prey model. , 2011, Mathematical biosciences.

[42]  Sebastian J. Schreiber,et al.  Persistence in fluctuating environments , 2010, Journal of mathematical biology.

[43]  Haiyin Li,et al.  Dynamics of the density dependent predator–prey system with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response , 2011 .

[44]  M. Benaim,et al.  Qualitative properties of certain piecewise deterministic Markov processes , 2012, 1204.4143.

[45]  Konstantinos Spiliopoulos,et al.  Large deviations for multiscale diffusion via weak convergence methods , 2010, 1011.5933.

[46]  Stefan Jansson,et al.  Genetic Variation in Functional Traits Influences Arthropod Community Composition in Aspen (Populus tremula L.) , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  S. Levin,et al.  Integrating Theoretical Climate and Fire Effects on Savanna and Forest Systems , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[48]  Konstantinos Spiliopoulos,et al.  Importance Sampling for Multiscale Diffusions , 2011, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[49]  D. Villemonais,et al.  Quasi-stationary distributions and population processes , 2011, 1112.4732.

[50]  Nicolas Champagnat,et al.  Exponential convergence to quasi-stationary distribution and Q\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Q$$\end{ , 2014, Probability Theory and Related Fields.

[51]  Manon Costa,et al.  A piecewise deterministic model for a prey-predator community , 2015, 1503.02492.

[52]  Sebastian J. Schreiber,et al.  Protected polymorphisms and evolutionary stability of patch-selection strategies in stochastic environments , 2014, bioRxiv.

[53]  Horst R. Thieme,et al.  Dynamical Systems And Population Persistence , 2016 .

[54]  Pierre-Andr'e Zitt,et al.  On the persistence regime for Lotka-Volterra in randomly fluctuating environments , 2016, 1601.08151.

[55]  Frithjof Lutscher,et al.  Seasonally Varying Predation Behavior and Climate Shifts Are Predicted to Affect Predator-Prey Cycles , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[56]  S. Schreiber,et al.  The demographic consequences of growing older and bigger in oyster populations. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[57]  F. Malrieu,et al.  Lotka-Volterra with randomly fluctuating environments: a full description , 2016, 1607.04395.

[58]  P. Chesson,et al.  The Effects of Dynamical Rates on Species Coexistence in a Variable Environment: The Paradox of the Plankton Revisited , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[59]  Claude Lobry,et al.  Lotka–Volterra with randomly fluctuating environments or “how switching between beneficial environments can make survival harder” , 2014, 1412.1107.

[60]  Nguyen Huu Du,et al.  Conditions for permanence and ergodicity of certain stochastic predator–prey models , 2015, Journal of Applied Probability.

[61]  Jianhai Bao,et al.  Permanence and Extinction of Regime-Switching Predator-Prey Models , 2015, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[62]  George Yin,et al.  Certain properties related to well posedness of switching diffusions , 2017, 1706.06670.

[63]  Amarjit Budhiraja,et al.  Large Deviations for Small Noise Diffusions in a Fast Markovian Environment , 2017, 1705.02948.

[64]  Alexandru Hening,et al.  Stochastic Lotka–Volterra food chains , 2017, Journal of mathematical biology.

[65]  Alexandru Hening,et al.  Coexistence and extinction for stochastic Kolmogorov systems , 2017, The Annals of Applied Probability.

[66]  Alexandru Hening,et al.  Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments: the density-dependent case , 2016, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[67]  P. Chesson Updates on mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[68]  Alexandru Hening,et al.  Persistence in Stochastic Lotka–Volterra Food Chains with Intraspecific Competition , 2017, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[69]  Carl Boettiger,et al.  From noise to knowledge: how randomness generates novel phenomena and reveals information. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[70]  M. Benaïm Stochastic Persistence. , 2018 .

[71]  Michel Benaim,et al.  A user-friendly condition for exponential ergodicity in randomly switched environments. , 2018, 1803.03456.

[72]  Yao Li A data-driven method for the steady state of randomly perturbed dynamics , 2018, Communications in Mathematical Sciences.

[73]  Giles Hooker,et al.  An expanded modern coexistence theory for empirical applications. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[74]  Alexandru Hening,et al.  Dynamical systems with fast switching and slow diffusion: Hyperbolic equilibria and stable limit cycles , 2019, 1902.01755.

[75]  Alexandru Hening,et al.  On a Predator-Prey System with Random Switching that Never Converges to its Equilibrium , 2017, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[76]  Martin Kolb,et al.  Quasistationary distributions for one-dimensional diffusions with singular boundary points , 2014, Stochastic Processes and their Applications.

[77]  M. Benaïm,et al.  Persistence and extinction for stochastic ecological models with internal and external variables , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[78]  Yao Li,et al.  An efficient data-driven solver for Fokker-Planck equations: algorithm and analysis , 2019, ArXiv.

[79]  Yao Li,et al.  Numerical computations of geometric ergodicity for stochastic dynamics , 2020, Nonlinearity.

[80]  Yingfei Yi,et al.  Quasi-stationary distributions of multi-dimensional diffusion processes , 2021, 2102.05785.

[81]  A classification of the dynamics of three-dimensional stochastic ecological systems. , 2020, 2004.00535.

[82]  Alexandru Hening,et al.  The competitive exclusion principle in stochastic environments , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[83]  Peter Chesson,et al.  A general theory of coexistence and extinction for stochastic ecological communities , 2020, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[84]  Yao Li,et al.  Using coupling methods to estimate sample quality for stochastic differential equations , 2019, ArXiv.