Brief report: validation of a system for automated measurement of knee laxity.

OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy and repeatability of an automated quantitative fluoroscopic imaging system for measuring knee laxity. DESIGN Cadaveric validation study. BACKGROUND Current methods of measuring anterior-posterior laxity lack sufficient accuracy and repeatability. A commercially developed fluoroscopic software package, capable of measuring laxity, required validation. METHODS Five human cadaveric knees were used. A constant force of 130 N was applied anteriorly and posteriorly in turn to the tibia of each knee with the femur fixed in 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion. Quantitative fluoroscopic measurements of anterior-posterior laxity were determined using image analysis software. Fluoroscopic results were compared to the true anterior-posterior displacements of the tibia, which were simultaneously recorded using linear transducers directly attached to the cadaveric specimens. RESULTS The quantitative fluoroscopic method underestimated laxity by an average of 0.40 mm with a root mean square error of 0.49 mm. The 95% confidence intervals for anterior and posterior laxity error were calculated to be -0.99 to 0.25 mm and -0.89 to 0.03 mm, respectively, where a negative error represents an underestimation. CONCLUSIONS The quantitative fluoroscopic method offers a dramatic improvement in accuracy over current laxity measurement techniques and acceptable repeatability for assessing ligament damage. RELEVANCE The considerably more accurate, validated measurement system of this study could improve ligament assessment and diagnosis, and the recognition of injuries otherwise undetected with current methods.

[1]  Braden C Fleming,et al.  Measurement of anterior–posterior knee laxity: a comparison of three techniques , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  J. Stiehl,et al.  Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  E S Grood,et al.  Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population , 1990, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  S.A. Banks,et al.  Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  B. Beynnon,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) for measuring knee laxity in longitudinal studies. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  G Selvik,et al.  Three-dimensional instability of the anterior cruciate deficient knee. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  R. Johnson,et al.  Clinical versus instrumented knee testing on autopsy specimens. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  B Zarins,et al.  Measurement of anterior-posterior displacement of the knee. A comparison of the results with instrumented devices and with clinical examination. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  C. Highgenboten,et al.  Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  B. Beynnon,et al.  A new device to measure knee laxity during weightbearing and non‐weightbearing conditions , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  G. Losse,et al.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.