Effects of unilateral isometric strength training on joint angle specificity and cross-training

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of unilateral isometric leg extension strength training on the strength and integrated electromyogram (IEMG) of both the trained and untrained limbs at multiple joint angles. A training (TRN) group [nine women; mean (SD) age, 20(1) years] exercised for 6 weeks with isometric leg extensions at 80% of maximal isometric torque. A control (CTL) group [eight women; 21(1) years] did not exercise. The training was performed three times per week on a Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer at a joint angle where the lever arm was 0.79 rad below the horizontal plane. The subjects were tested pre- and posttraining for maximal unilateral isometric torque in both limbs at joint angles of zero, 0.26, 0.79,1.31, and 1.57 rad below the horizontal plane. Bipolar surface electrodes were used to record the IEMG of the vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) during the isometric tests. Three univariate (torque, IEMG-VL, and IEMG-VM) four-way (group x time x limb x angle) mixed factorial ANOVAs were used to analyze the data. The results indicated joint angle specificity for isometric torque in the TRN group only, with significant increases in torque at 0.79 (P = 0.0004) and 1.31 (P = 0.0039) rad. No significant increases in torque were found in the untrained limb of the TRN group or in either limb of the CTL group. Similarly, there were no significant changes in IEMG as a result of the training for the VL or VM. The joint-angle-specific strength increases without concomitant increases in IEMG were hypothesized to result from joint-angle-specific decreases in antagonistic co-contraction and/or preferential hypertropy of the quadriceps femoris at specific levels of the muscle group.

[1]  P. Zipp,et al.  Recommendations for the standardization of lead positions in surface electromyography , 1982, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[2]  L G Shaver,et al.  Cross transfer effects of conditioning and deconditioning on muscular strength. , 1975, Ergonomics.

[3]  H. Devries,et al.  Factors affecting the estimation of physical working capacity at the fatigue threshold. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[4]  I. B. Stern,et al.  The uptake of tritiated thymidine by the dorsal epidermis of the fetal and newborn rat , 1971, The Anatomical record.

[5]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Effect of strength training on EMG of human skeletal muscle. , 1976, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  E Cafarelli,et al.  Neuromuscular adaptations to training. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  E Cafarelli,et al.  Adaptations in coactivation after isometric resistance training. , 1992, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  P. Tesch,et al.  Effects of exhaustive, isometric training on lactate accumulation in different muscle fiber types. , 1984, International journal of sports medicine.

[9]  O. Rutherford,et al.  Human muscle strength training: the effects of three different regimens and the nature of the resultant changes. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Tetsuo Fukunaga,et al.  A study on training effect on strength per unit cross-sectional area of muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement , 2004, Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie.

[11]  D. Sale,et al.  Positive adaptations to weight-lifting training in the elderly. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[13]  C. Gielen,et al.  Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Sale,et al.  Specificity of joint angle in isometric training , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  J. Knapik,et al.  Angular Specificity and Test Mode Specificity of Isometric and lsokinetic Strength Training *. , 1983, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[16]  T J Housh,et al.  Hypertrophic response to unilateral concentric isokinetic resistance training. , 1992, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  R. Hutton,et al.  Was Sherrington right about co-contractions? , 1986, Brain Research.

[18]  O. Rutherford,et al.  The role of learning and coordination in strength training , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[19]  M. Lindh Increase of muscle strength from isometric quadriceps exercises at different knee angles. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  V. Vihko,et al.  Effect of isometric strength training on mechanical, electrical, and metabolic aspects of muscle function , 1978, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[21]  Roger M. Enoka,et al.  Muscle Strength and Its Development , 1988, Sports medicine.

[22]  H. Appell,et al.  Effect of electrical stimulation of high and low frequency on maximum isometric force and some morphological characteristics in men. , 1987, International journal of sports medicine.

[23]  L. Sjöström,et al.  The effect of unilateral isokinetic strength training on local adipose and muscle tissue morphology, thickness, and enzymes , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[24]  N. J. Patton,et al.  An electromyographic study of reciprocal activity of muscles , 1971, The Anatomical record.

[25]  T. Moritani,et al.  Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. , 1979, American journal of physical medicine.

[26]  D. A. Ranney,et al.  Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: A one leg model , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[27]  M. V. Narici,et al.  Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[28]  T. R. Garrett,et al.  Strength changes in the normal quadriceps femoris muscle as a result of electrical stimulation. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[29]  T J Housh,et al.  Electromyographic evaluation of joint angle specificity and cross-training after isometric training. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[30]  E Cafarelli,et al.  Relative changes in maximal force, EMG, and muscle cross-sectional area after isometric training. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[31]  B. Maton,et al.  Myoelectrical and mechanical changes linked to length specificity during isometric training. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.