Power requirement of the geodynamo from ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos

In the Earth's fluid outer core, a dynamo process converts thermal and gravitational energy into magnetic energy. The power needed to sustain the geomagnetic field is set by the ohmic losses (dissipation due to electrical resistance). Recent estimates of ohmic losses cover a wide range, from 0.1 to 3.5 TW, or roughly 0.3–10% of the Earth's surface heat flow. The energy requirement of the dynamo puts constraints on the thermal budget and evolution of the core through Earth's history. Here we use a set of numerical dynamo models to derive scaling relations between the core's characteristic dissipation time and the core's magnetic and hydrodynamic Reynolds numbers—dimensionless numbers that measure the ratio of advective transport to magnetic and viscous diffusion, respectively. The ohmic dissipation of the Karlsruhe dynamo experiment supports a simple dependence on the magnetic Reynolds number alone, indicating that flow turbulence in the experiment and in the Earth's core has little influence on its characteristic dissipation time. We use these results to predict moderate ohmic dissipation in the range of 0.2–0.5 TW, which removes the need for strong radioactive heating in the core and allows the age of the solid inner core to exceed 2.5 billion years.

[1]  R. Stieglitz,et al.  The Karlsruhe Dynamo Experiment , 1999 .

[2]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  An Earth-like numerical dynamo model , 1997, Nature.

[3]  S. Labrosse Thermal and magnetic evolution of the Earth’s core , 2003 .

[4]  B. Wood,et al.  Potassium in the Earth’s core? , 2002 .

[5]  R. Stieglitz,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a homogeneous two-scale dynamo , 2000 .

[6]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary , 1992 .

[7]  B. Buffett Estimates of heat flow in the deep mantle based on the power requirements for the geodynamo , 2002 .

[8]  R. Secco,et al.  The electrical resistivity of solid and liquid Fe at pressures up to 7 GPa , 1989 .

[9]  M. Gillan,et al.  Can the Earth's dynamo run on heat alone? , 2003 .

[10]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field , 1994 .

[11]  Geoffrey D. Price,et al.  The influence of potassium on core and geodynamo evolution , 2003 .

[12]  M. McElhinny,et al.  Paleomagnetic evidence for the existence of the geomagnetic field 3.5 Ga ago , 1980 .

[13]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Geomagnetic secular variation , 1989, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[14]  Ulrich R. Christensen,et al.  Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic parameter study , 1999 .

[15]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  From stable dipolar towards reversing numerical dynamos , 2002 .

[16]  Robert A. Langel,et al.  A geomagnetic field spectrum , 1982 .

[17]  A. Tilgner Numerical simulation of the onset of dynamo action in an experimental two-scale dynamo , 2002 .

[18]  A. Soward,et al.  Earth's Core and Lower Mantle , 2003 .

[19]  G. Glatzmaier,et al.  A test of the frozen-flux approximation using a new geodynamo model , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  V. Murthy,et al.  Experimental evidence that potassium is a substantial radioactive heat source in planetary cores , 2003, Nature.

[21]  V. Pochtarev GEOMAGNETIC SECULAR VARIATIONS , 1962 .