Squaring online reverse auctions with the Caux Round Table Principles for Business

Examines if online reverse auctions are consistent with the Caux Round Table Principles for Business. Identifies numerous contradictions that contribute to the perpetuation of divisive business practices. Concludes that buyer behaviors must evolve from focusing on short‐term tactics designed to reduce purchase price and instead pursue collaborative cost reduction practices with key suppliers.

[1]  M. Emiliani.  A mathematical logic approach to the shareholder vs stakeholder debate , 2001 .

[2]  M. Nowak,et al.  The economics of fair play. , 2002, Scientific American.

[3]  M. Emiliani,et al.  Online reverse auction purchasing contracts , 2001 .

[4]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota , 1999 .

[5]  Alexandre Beaudet,et al.  The Toyota Group and the Aisin Fire , 1998 .

[6]  D. Crowther.  Creating Shareholder Value , 2003 .

[7]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Supply Chain Development for the Lean Enterprise: Interorganizational Cost Management , 1999 .

[8]  Bowon Kim,et al.  The perception gap among buyer and suppliers in the semiconductor industry , 1999 .

[9]  N. Holtzman.  Proceed with caution , 1989 .

[10]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Realizing savings from online reverse auctions , 2002 .

[11]  Chong Leng Tan,et al.  Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance , 2001 .

[12]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[13]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[14]  M. Emiliani.  Business‐to‐business online auctions: key issues for purchasing process improvement , 2000 .

[15]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  The inevitability of conflict between buyers and sellers , 2003 .