Different pulse shapes to obtain small fiber selective activation by anodal blocking-a simulation study

The aim of this study was to investigate whether it is possible to reduce a charge per pulse, which is needed for selective nerve stimulation. Simulation is performed using a two-part simulation model: a volume conductor model to calculate the electrical potential distribution inside a tripolar cuff electrode and a human fiber model to simulate the fiber response to simulation. Selective stimulation is obtained by anodal block. To obtain anodal block of large fibers, long square pulses (>350 /spl mu/s) with a relatively high currents (1-2.5 mA) are usually required. These pulses might not be safe for a long-term application because of a high charge per pulse. In this study, several pulse shapes are proposed that have less charge per pulse compared with the conventional square pulse and would therefore be safer in a chronic application. Compared with the conventional square pulse, it was possible to reduce the charge with all proposed pulse shapes, but the best results are obtained with a combination of a square depolarizing pulse and a blocking pulse. The charge per pulse was up to 32% less with that pulse shape than with a square pulse. Using a hyperpolarizing anodal prepulse preceding a square pulse, it was not possible to block nerve fibers in a whole nerve bundle and to obtain reduction of a charge per phase. Reduction of the charge could be achieved only with spatially selective blocking. The charge per phase was larger for the combination of a hyperpolarizing anodal prepulse and a two-step pulse than for the two-step pulse alone.

[1]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Optimization of inactivating current waveform for selective peripheral nerve stimulation , 1997 .

[2]  Hessel Wijkstra,et al.  Acute animal studies on the use of an anodal block to reduce urethral resistance in sacral root stimulation , 1994 .

[3]  J. Mortimer,et al.  Selective activation of small motor axons by quasitrapezoidal current pulses , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  D. McCreery,et al.  Damage in peripheral nerve from continuous electrical stimulation: Comparison of two stimulus waveforms , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  M. Zimmermann Dorsal Root Potentials after C-Fiber Stimulation , 1968, Science.

[6]  Piet Bergveld,et al.  The effect of subthreshold prepulses on the recruitment order in a nerve trunk analyzed in a simple and a realistic volume conductor model , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  J. M. Ritchie,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Selective stimulation of sacral nerve roots for bladder control: A study by computer modeling , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  D. Mcneal Analysis of a Model for Excitation of Myelinated Nerve , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  A. Huxley,et al.  The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  E. V. Goodall,et al.  Modeling study of activation and propagation delays during stimulation of peripheral nerve fibers with a tripolar cuff electrode , 1995 .

[12]  F. Rattay,et al.  Modeling axon membranes for functional electrical stimulation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  M D Craggs,et al.  A technique for anodally blocking large nerve fibres through chronically implanted electrodes. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  Hessel Wijkstra,et al.  Selective detrusor activation by sacral ventral nerve-root stimulation: results of intraoperative testing in humans during implantation of a Finetech-Brindley system , 1998, World Journal of Urology.

[15]  Hugh Bostock,et al.  Action potentials and membrane currents in the human node of Ranvier , 1995, Pflügers Archiv.

[16]  R. Warzok,et al.  Classification of human peripheral nerve fibre groups by conduction velocity and nerve fibre diameter is preserved following spinal cord lesion. , 1995, Journal of the autonomic nervous system.

[17]  A MODIFIED PULSESHAPE FOR SELECTIVE STIMULATION USING ANODAL BLOCK , 2001 .

[18]  J Nilsson,et al.  Differences between the time constant of sensory and motor peripheral nerve fibers: Further studies and considerations , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Stimulus waveforms for selective neural stimulation , 1995 .

[20]  J. Thomas Mortimer,et al.  A Technique for Collision Block of Peripheral Nerve: Frequency Dependence , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  F. Behse,et al.  Morphometric studies on the human sural nerve. , 1990, Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[23]  W. Grill,et al.  Inversion of the current-distance relationship by transient depolarization , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  A model of the electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibres based on human data , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[25]  G Schalow Number of fibres and fibre diameter distributions of nerves innervating the urinary bladder in humans. Acceptor nerve analysis. II.(IV). , 1992, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  A new pulse shape to obtain selective small fiber activation by anodal blocking , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.