Highest dominant frequency and rotor positions are robust markers of driver location during noninvasive mapping of atrial fibrillation: A computational study.

BACKGROUND Dominant frequency (DF) and rotor mapping have been proposed as noninvasive techniques to guide localization of drivers maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the robustness of both techniques in identifying atrial drivers noninvasively under the effect of electrical noise or model uncertainties. METHODS Inverse-computed DFs and phase maps were obtained from 30 different mathematical AF simulations. Epicardial highest dominant frequency (HDF) regions and rotor location were compared with the same inverse-computed measurements after addition of noise to the ECG, size variations of the atria, and linear or angular deviations in the atrial location inside the thorax. RESULTS Inverse-computed electrograms (EGMs) individually correlated poorly with the original EGMs in the absence of induced uncertainties (0.45 ± 0.12) and were worse with 10-dB noise (0.22 ± 0.11), 3-cm displacement (0.01 ± 0.02), or 36° rotation (0.02 ± 0.03). However, inverse-computed HDF regions showed robustness against induced uncertainties: from 82% ± 18% match for the best conditions, down to 73% ± 23% for 10-dB noise, 77% ± 21% for 5-cm displacement, and 60% ± 22% for 36° rotation. The distance from the inverse-computed rotor to the original rotor was also affected by uncertainties: 0.8 ± 1.61 cm for the best conditions, 2.4 ± 3.6 cm for 10-dB noise, 4.3 ± 3.2 cm for 4-cm displacement, and 4.0 ± 2.1 cm for 36° rotation. Restriction of rotor detections to the HDF area increased rotor detection accuracy from 4.5 ± 4.5 cm to 3.2 ± 3.1 cm (P <.05) with 0-dB noise. CONCLUSION The combination of frequency and phase-derived measurements increases the accuracy of noninvasive localization of atrial rotors driving AF in the presence of noise and uncertainties in atrial location or size.

[1]  Ashok J. Shah,et al.  Driver Domains in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, Circulation.

[2]  M. Allessie,et al.  CrossTalk opposing view: Rotors have not been demonstrated to be the drivers of atrial fibrillation , 2014, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Jichao Zhao,et al.  Atrial fibrillation driven by micro-anatomic intramural re-entry revealed by simultaneous sub-epicardial and sub-endocardial optical mapping in explanted human hearts. , 2015, European heart journal.

[4]  Ulrich Schotten,et al.  Electropathological Substrate of Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease: Longitudinal Dissociation , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[5]  Ling Xia,et al.  Effect of Cardiac Motion on Solution of the Electrocardiography Inverse Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  M. Mansour,et al.  Spatially Distributed Dominant Excitation Frequencies Reveal Hidden Organization in Atrial Fibrillation in the Langendorff‐Perfused Sheep Heart , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  J. Millet,et al.  Noninvasive Estimation of Epicardial Dominant High‐Frequency Regions During Atrial Fibrillation , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  J. Millet,et al.  Noninvasive Localization of Maximal Frequency Sites of Atrial Fibrillation by Body Surface Potential Mapping , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[9]  José Jalife,et al.  CrossTalk proposal: Rotors have been demonstrated to drive human atrial fibrillation , 2014, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Y. Rudy,et al.  Electrocardiographic Imaging: II. Effect of Torso Inhomogeneities on Noninvasive Reconstruction of Epicardial Potentials, Electrograms, and Isochrones , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  Andrew J. Pullan,et al.  Effects of experimental and modeling errors on electrocardiographic inverse formulations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  D. V. Van Wagoner,et al.  Adenosine-Induced Atrial Fibrillation: Localized Reentrant Drivers in Lateral Right Atria due to Heterogeneous Expression of Adenosine A1 Receptors and GIRK4 Subunits in the Human Heart. , 2016, Circulation.

[13]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Body surface localization of left and right atrial high-frequency rotors in atrial fibrillation patients: a clinical-computational study. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[14]  Sanjiv M Narayan,et al.  Direct or coincidental elimination of stable rotors or focal sources may explain successful atrial fibrillation ablation: on-treatment analysis of the CONFIRM trial (Conventional ablation for AF with or without focal impulse and rotor modulation). , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Noninvasive Characterization of Epicardial Activation in Humans With Diverse Atrial Fibrillation Patterns , 2010, Circulation.