Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors.

PURPOSE We identified risk factors predicting severe bleeding due to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Computerized data on 2,909 patients who underwent a total of 3,878 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures between January 1995 and December 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on patients who experienced severe bleeding requiring angiographic renal embolization were compared with those on other patients using univariate and multivariate analyses. We tested the characteristics of patients, kidneys and stones together with details of the operative procedure and surgeon experience. RESULTS Severe bleeding complicated a total of 39 procedures (1%) in 25 males and 14 females with a mean age of 50.7 +/- 12.6 years. Associated morbidity included shock in 6 patients and perirenal hematoma in 4. Renal angiography revealed pseudoaneurysm in 20 patients, arteriovenous fistula in 9, the 2 lesions in 8 and arterial laceration in 2. Bleeding could be controlled with superselective embolization in 36 patients (92.3%). Followup was available on 33 patients (mean 21 +/- 15 months). Renal function was stable in all patients except 3 who had a post-embolization increase in serum creatinine, of whom all had a solitary kidney and none required renal replacement therapy. Significant risk factors for severe bleeding were upper caliceal puncture, solitary kidney, staghorn stone, multiple punctures and inexperienced surgeon. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be performed by an experienced endourologist in patients at risk for severe bleeding, such as those with a solitary kidney or staghorn stones.

[1]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[2]  S Lapointe,et al.  Percutaneous removal of renal and ureteral calculi: experience with 400 cases. , 1985, The Journal of urology.

[3]  L. Galek,et al.  Haemorrhagic complications of percutaneous lithotripsy: Original methods of treatment , 2000, International Urology and Nephrology.

[4]  G. Badlani,et al.  Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  G. Bellman,et al.  Management of hemorrhage after percutaneous renal surgery. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[6]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Evolution of the technique of combination therapy for staghorn calculi: a decreasing role for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[7]  R. Clayman,et al.  Tamponade nephrostomy catheter for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. , 1986, Urology.

[8]  J. W. Segura,et al.  Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. , 1985, The Journal of urology.

[9]  T. El-Diasty,et al.  Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for renal stones in over 1000 patients. , 1992, British journal of urology.

[10]  O. Rouvière,et al.  Severe Bleeding after Nephrolithotomy: Results of Hyperselective Embolization , 2000, European Urology.

[11]  Amit Suri,et al.  Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? , 2005, Urology.

[12]  J. Wolf,et al.  Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[13]  W. Szewczyk,et al.  Massive haemorrhage presenting as a complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) , 1996, International Urology and Nephrology.

[14]  J. W. Segura,et al.  The etiology and treatment of delayed bleeding following percutaneous lithotripsy. , 1985, The Journal of urology.

[15]  J. Church,et al.  Delayed rupture of renal pseudoaneurysm: complication of percutaneous nephrostomy. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  G. Bellman,et al.  Massive hemorrhage from renal vein injury during percutaneous renal surgery: endourological management. , 1997, The Journal of urology.