Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the cognitive work analysis design toolkit (CWA-DT)

Abstract Crashes at intersections represent an important road safety problem. Interactions between different road user types, such as between vehicles and vulnerable road users, are a particular concern. It has been suggested driver-centric road design plays a role in crashes. A multi-road user evaluation of three novel intersection designs is described. The designs were generated using the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit, underpinned by sociotechnical systems theory. The desktop evaluation involved drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians rating the design concepts against alignment with design goals, sociotechnical systems theory and usability, and providing feedback on the positive and negative aspects. Two concepts received more positive ratings and feedback in comparison to a concept that provided more user autonomy. The evaluation results also highlight clear differences in needs across road user groups. The design and evaluation process demonstrates how sociotechnical systems values and principles can be applied in the design of public spaces. Practitioner Summary: This study involved a participatory evaluation of novel road intersection designs, based on sociotechnical systems theory. The results identified important differences in needs and preferences across road user groups and demonstrate the value of sociotechnical systems theory and user participation in road transport design and evaluation processes. Abbreviations: CWA-DT: cognitive work analysis design toolkit; WDA: work domain analysis; SUS: system usability scale

[1]  C W Clegg,et al.  Sociotechnical principles for system design. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Michael G Lenné,et al.  When paradigms collide at the road rail interface: evaluation of a sociotechnical systems theory design toolkit for cognitive work analysis , 2016, Ergonomics.

[3]  Nicholas Stevens,et al.  Sociotechnical urbanism: new systems ergonomics perspectives on land use planning and urban design , 2016 .

[4]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Using cognitive work analysis and the strategies analysis diagram to understand variability in road user behaviour at intersections , 2013, Ergonomics.

[5]  William J. Horrey,et al.  Automated driving: Safety blind spots , 2018 .

[6]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The Design with Intent Method: a design tool for influencing user behaviour. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Gordan H. Robinson.  Accidents and sociotechnical systems: principles for design , 1982 .

[8]  Pnina Gershon,et al.  Increasing motorcycles attention and search conspicuity by using Alternating-Blinking Lights System (ABLS). , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Cognitive compatibility of motorcyclists and car drivers. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Jesper Sandin.  An analysis of common patterns in aggregated causation charts from intersection crashes. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Wolfgang Fastenmeier,et al.  Reliability of drivers in urban intersections. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  David D Clarke,et al.  The role of motorcyclist and other driver behaviour in two types of serious accident in the UK. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: a call for bravery. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice , 2015, Ergonomics.

[16]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  A review of sociotechnical systems theory: a classic concept for new command and control paradigms , 2008 .

[17]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Exploring schema-driven differences in situation awareness between road users: an on-road study of driver, cyclist and motorcyclist situation awareness , 2014, Ergonomics.

[18]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Using the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) to explore conflicts between different road user groups when making right hand turns at urban intersections , 2014, Ergonomics.

[19]  Shu-Ling Chong,et al.  Epidemiology of Pedestrian-Motor Vehicle Fatalities and Injuries, 2006-2015. , 2018, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  Leena Norros.  Developing human factors/ergonomics as a design discipline. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  Albert Cherns,et al.  Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted , 1987 .

[22]  Stephen H Richards,et al.  Differences in passenger car and large truck involved crash frequencies at urban signalized intersections: an exploratory analysis. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  A sociotechnical design toolkit for bridging the gap between systems‐based analyses and system design , 2018, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries.