When decision support systems fail: Insights for strategic information systems from Formula 1

Decision support systems (DSS) are sophisticated tools that increasingly take advantage of big data and are used to design and implement individual - and organization - level strategic decisions . Yet, when organizations excessively rely on their potential the outcome may be decision - making failure, particularly when such tools are applied under high pressure and turbulent conditions. Partial understanding and unidimensional interpretation can prevent learning from failure. Building on a practice perspective, we study an iconic case of strategic failure in Formula 1 racing. Our approach, which integrates the decision maker as well as the organizational and material context , identifies three interrelated sources of strategic failure that are worth investigation for decision - makers using DSS and big data: (1) t he situated nature and affordances of decision - making ; (2) t he distributed nature of cognition in decision - making; and (3) the performativity of the DSS. We outline specific research questions and their implications for firm performance and competitive advantage. Finally, we advance an agenda that can help close timely gaps in strategic IS research.

[1]  F. Vallée-Tourangeau,et al.  Interactivity fosters Bayesian reasoning without instruction. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Graham Pervan,et al.  A critical analysis of decision support systems research revisited: the rise of design science , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off , 2004 .

[4]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition Ceo Publication G 93-16 (236) Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition Designing Information Technology to Support Distributed Cognition , 1994 .

[5]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[6]  J. Barney.  Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1986 .

[7]  Daniel P. Forbes.  Reconsidering the Strategic Implications of Decision Comprehensiveness , 2007 .

[8]  K. Weick.  Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[9]  Gokhan Ertug,et al.  What’s in it for them? Advantages of Higher Status Partners in Exchange Relationships , 2010 .

[10]  R. Whittington,et al.  Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously , 2012 .

[11]  Harry Scarbrough,et al.  Developing a Relational View of the Organizing Role of Objects: A study of the innovation process in computer games , 2015 .

[12]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  Reframing Success and Failure of Information Systems: A Performative Perspective , 2014, MIS Q..

[13]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[14]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice , 2015 .

[15]  Sue Newell,et al.  Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Sue Newell,et al.  Datification and its human, organizational and societal effects: The strategic opportunities and challenges of algorithmic decision-making , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[18]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[19]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[20]  I. Hutchby.  Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[21]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[22]  G. Villejoubert,et al.  Constructing Preferences in the Physical World: A Distributed-Cognition Perspective on Preferences and Risky Choices , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[23]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Paolo Aversa,et al.  Sometimes, Less Innovation is Better , 2017 .

[25]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Ioanna D. Constantiou,et al.  New games, new rules: big data and the changing context of strategy , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Stefan Haefliger,et al.  Opening up design science: The challenge of designing for reuse and joint development , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Dynamic Reconfiguration in Planetary Exploration: A Sociomaterial Ethnography , 2014, MIS Q..

[29]  J. Child,et al.  Influences on strategic decision effectiveness: Development and test of an integrative model , 2007 .

[30]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The quality of group tacit knowledge , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Anwar M. Ghuloum,et al.  ViewpointFace the inevitable, embrace parallelism , 2009, CACM.

[33]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[34]  Lakshmi Goel,et al.  The Social Component of Information Systems - How Sociability Contributes to Technology Acceptance , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Designing semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments , 1978 .

[36]  Stefan Haefliger,et al.  Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013 , 2015 .

[37]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[38]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[39]  J. March.  Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence , 2006 .

[40]  D. Lazer,et al.  The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis , 2014, Science.

[41]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics , 2007 .

[42]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  M. Jenkins.  Technological Discontinuities and Competitive Advantage: A Historical Perspective on Formula 1 Motor Racing 1950–2006 , 2010 .

[44]  D. MacKenzie.  An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets , 2006 .

[45]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  How to Conduct a Practice-based Study: Problems and Methods , 2013 .

[46]  Marleen Huysman,et al.  Debating big data: A literature review on realizing value from big data , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[48]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[49]  Paolo Aversa,et al.  Driving Performance via Exploration in Changing Environments: Evidence from Formula One Racing , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[50]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[51]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Big Data and Management , 2014 .

[52]  M. Giraudeau.  The Drafts of Strategy: Opening up Plans and their Uses , 2008 .

[53]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[54]  J. Fredrickson.  The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes: Extension, Observations, Future Directions , 1984 .

[55]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[56]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[57]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Information Systems Strategy and Strategy-as-Practice: A joint agenda , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Laure Cabantous,et al.  Rational Decision-Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality Éternel Retour , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[59]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Psychology of Preferences , 1982 .

[60]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Does Decision Process Matter? A Study Of Strategic Decision-making Effectiveness , 1996 .

[62]  Edwin Hutchins.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995 .

[63]  Visvalingam Suppiah,et al.  Organisational Culture's Influence on Tacit Knowledge Sharing Behaviour , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[64]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Big Data: Related Technologies, Challenges and Future Prospects , 2014 .

[65]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Information systems strategy as practice: Micro strategy and strategizing for IS , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Arnold Picot,et al.  Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda , 2015, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Jeanne G. Harris,et al.  Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning , 2007 .

[68]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[69]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[70]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[71]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness , 2008 .

[72]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Race against the machine : how the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy , 2011 .

[73]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[74]  Adam Jacobs,et al.  The pathologies of big data , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[75]  Bart Baesens,et al.  Call for Papers MISQ Special Issue on Transformational Issues of Big Data and Analytics in Networked Business , 2014 .

[76]  Francesca Gino,et al.  Why leaders don't learn from success. , 2011, Harvard business review.

[77]  M. S. Morgan.  The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think , 2012 .

[78]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[79]  M. Callon.  Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics , 1998 .

[80]  Laure Cabantous,et al.  Decision Theory as Practice: Crafting Rationality in Organizations , 2010 .

[81]  Sue Newell,et al.  The Sociomaterialty of Information Systems: Current Status, Future Directions , 2014, MIS Q..

[82]  K. Manktelow,et al.  Thinking and Reasoning: An Introduction to the Psychology of Reason, Judgment and Decision Making , 2012 .

[83]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[84]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[85]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[86]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Planning , 1993, MIS Q..

[87]  M. Callon.  What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative? , 2006, Do Economists Make Markets?.

[88]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..