A dyadic segmentation approach to business partnerships

In business science, the studied objects are often groups of partners rather than independent firms. Extending classical segmentation to these polyads raises conceptual problems, principally: defining what should be consid- ered as common or specific at the partners' and at the segment levels. The general approaches consist either in merging partners characteristics and performances into a single macro-object, thus loosing their specific contributions to each partner's performance, or in modelling partners' performance as if their models were inde- pendent. As a step to understanding, how partnership influences firms' perform- ance, the dyadic (i.e. two partners') case is studied. First, some theoretical issues concerning the degrees of individual and contributive interest in a dyadic popula- tion are discussed. Next, partnership's conceptualisation is based upon two models for each firm: a "self-model" that reflects how the firm's characteristics explain its own performance, and a "contributive-model" model that reflects how these characteristics influence the partner's performance. This allows definition of three relationship modes: merging, teaming and sharing. Subsequently, dyad segmenta- tion strategies are discussed according to their capacity to reflect the modes of part- nership and a dyadic clusterwise regression method, based on a genetic algorithm, is presented. Finally, the method is illustrated empirically using actual data of busi- ness partners in the software market.

[1]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  The Space Between: Towards a Typology of Interfirm Relations , 1998 .

[2]  H. Bozdogan Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[3]  Ravi S. Achrol,et al.  Changes in the Theory of Interorganizational Relations in Marketing: Toward a Network Paradigm: , 1997 .

[4]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[5]  James A. Narus,et al.  A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships , 1990 .

[6]  Jeffrey L. Bradach,et al.  Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms , 1989 .

[7]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships? , 1992 .

[8]  C. Medlin Relational norms and relationship classes : from independent actors to dyadic interdependence / by Christopher John Medlin. , 2001 .

[9]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  The Meaning and Strategic Use of Factor Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  Keysuk Kim On interfirm power, channel climate, and solidarity in industrial distributor-supplier dyads , 2000 .

[11]  D. Ford Understanding business markets : interaction, relationships and networks , 1997 .

[12]  JACQUES-MARIE AURIFEILLE,et al.  A bio-mimetic approach to marketing segmentation: Principles and comparative analysis , 2000 .

[13]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[14]  T. Bonoma Conflict, cooperation and trust in three power systems , 1976 .

[15]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[16]  Charles C. Nielson An empirical examination of the role of “closeness” in industrial buyer‐seller relationships , 1998 .

[17]  M. Wedel,et al.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , 1997 .

[18]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral Approach , 1996 .

[19]  Gregory T. Gundlach,et al.  The Structure of Commitment in Exchange , 1995 .

[20]  B. Borys,et al.  Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations , 1989 .

[21]  Kent Eriksson,et al.  Business Networks and Cooperation in International Business Relationships , 1996 .

[22]  Dan Boneh,et al.  On genetic algorithms , 1995, COLT '95.

[23]  Jacques-Marie Aurifeille,et al.  Methodological and empirical issues in market segmentation: a comparison of the formal and the bio-mimetic methods , 2000 .

[24]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models , 1995 .

[25]  David T. Wilson An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships , 1995 .

[26]  N. Luhmann Trust and Power , 1979 .

[27]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[28]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality , 1992 .

[29]  Louis W. Stern,et al.  Power Measurement in the Distribution Channel , 1972 .

[30]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1987 .